Anyone who simply looked at infection fatality rate data very early on knew healthy youngsters face virtually zero risk of mortality from COVID. The fact that those horrifically dangerous injections are being pushed on them, pointlessly even if they were effective, is beyond tragic. It should be dealt with as criminal negligence.
Let me restate what is known about the immunity of the respiratory tracts since at least the 1960s. Vaccines elicit the production of IgG and IgM antibodies in the bloodstream, which do not affect the immunity of the respiratory tract.
The respiratory tract relies on mucous membranes and ciliated epithelium to remove billions of foreign antigens, such as viruses, bacteria, pollen, and dust, that we inhale daily. The primary antibody in the respiratory tract is secretory IgA (sec-IgA), which is non-specific. Vaccinating against influenza, COVID, RSV, and rhinoviruses is just pushing worthless snake oil.
In hindsight, this is likely the reason why every time that I took my GP's advice to get the seasonal flu shot, I got the flu. The natural protection provided by respiratory mucosa is bypassed by injected vaccines.
Next time, please remember that only about 38% of severe respiratory infections can be diagnosed. Among these, the most common viruses are rhinoviruses. Flu viruses are found in very few respiratory infections.
I have learned a lot during the past 5 years. I have focused on prevention by eating well, taking vitamin D during the winter, exercise, etc. I avoided the shots. I experienced what could have been covid in early 2022, but the symptoms were basically a very scratchy throat that lasted for a day.
Yes, I heard this from Prof R. Clancy too. If injected ‘vaccines' don’t produce a response in the mucosal membranes then they cannot effectively prevent transmission of the virus. This means that herd immunity cannot be generated by these vaccines. In fact these injections were not even approved for the use of preventing transmission in many jurisdictions.
Many researchers, such as John Ioannidis of Stanford, confuse the role of humoral (antibody) immunity in the blood with that of immunity in the respiratory tract. There is no herd immunity toward respiratory infections.
It took that vaccine about 10 years ago. To my surprise, I later found a study published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews that examined the Prevnar 20 vaccine (by Pfizer!) and showed protection of 0.8%. It's junk, like other infamous medicines and vaccines from this company.
My mother in law was just recommended to take that. I told her to now stay away from any "vacination " they say to take. After 5 years of these kill shots people still are dumb as fuck!
It's much worse than that with the mRNA and the lipid nano particle delivery device injecting SV40 directly into your DNA suppressing your ability to recognize cancerous cells produced by these gene editing bio-weapon. This mRNA was never to be used on plants, animals or humans. Who knows what these evil bastards will produce in insects that bite animals and humans. I wouldn't put it past them after Bill Gates and his mosquitoes flying syringes.
You misunderstood Mr. Kevin McKernan's hoax. First, monkey virus SV40 does not infect humans and is not linked to cancer in humans. Second, the plasmid used to produce the vaccine mRNA doesn't contain the virus's complete sequence but only a small fragment.
Nonetheless, the mRNA-based vaccines are toxic and should never be used in humans.
There are studies back in the late 50s early 60s showing sv40 monkey liver not filtered from the polio “vacinne” batch was causing cancers. That was pre LNP. Supposedly with the lnp it allows this sv40 dna a direct path to the dna of those who are unlucky enough to take it. Now the modRNA is another story as it is wiping out the immune system as well as the bodies ability to fight cancers. SV40 is not a virus.
So the bio-weapon is fake science? And the mRNA is fake science? Is the Wuhan lab fake science and all the bio-weapon labs in Canada, Ukraine and US all fake science? Are the jabs all fake science? Or were those intentionally done to remove people from this earth? Were pcr tests fake and only utilized for DNA database or were they too spiked with another variety of poison. I see you have many many years of exactly this experience. You would be the best to help answer these questions because I've had enough of these mercenaries that are called doctors lying to me and my family.
The scariest thing you said, in my opinion is “remarkably, the discussion section contains a WARNING that the data are not to be used to question the conclusion that the shots are awesome.” “It is going to become a major issue if these statements are allowed in publications and then regurgitated uncontested in court.
Ok, the first part reveals to me the authoritarian nature of the discussion section. It’s reminiscent of what occurred during the first couple of years or so. Is this pharma showing their true colours out in the open with the government’s backing? What happens if the warning is not heeded? More career destroying attacks? This is insane, what the hell is going on? Back when we all thought we were going to be killed by the virus, I understand the government backing the shot but this is a whole new ballgame. Does the government toe the line for pharma?
When you say regurgitated uncontested in court. Who would be suing who? It does really look like the courts support the government. Honestly, it feels like we are living in a dictatorship run by very wealthy and influential people, because it’s all about the profit and the control to keep that profit pouring in.
Thank you Dr. Bridle for continuing to enlighten us and push back against the flawed science. I find the strongest argument for others (and for myself) is that the COVID vaccines do not reduce - indeed they INCREASE - the rate of COVID infection. There are now 8 peer-reviewed studies saying so, showing "negative efficacy" (what an Orwellian term!). We should repeat this in every discussion of pros and cons. Because even if the infection has an adverse outcome, every multi-boostered person will be exposing themselves to MORE infections and therefore more adverse outcomes. Six of the studies showing 'negative efficacy' are listed here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-sixth-study-confirms-negative
These are the other two relevant studies: IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10222767/
which makes it, as designed, a working “delivery vehicle” for bioweapon inserts in the genetic code of sars-cov2. Most especially in the “spike protein” of sars-cov2 - so long as that code is being used to program the mRNA and viral vector “vaccine” platform’s spike antigen production
"...every multi-boostered person will be exposing themselves to MORE infections and therefore more adverse outcomes."
100%
But I think THE strongest argument is that The Biggest Lie of the "COVID vaccine" propaganda is that the mRNA COVID shots are vaccines.
More people need to understand the truth that the "COVID vaccines" are modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" transfection products.
The mRNA transfection platform itself is irreparably flawed & inherently dangerous and the platform itself IS the primary problem.
The mechanism of action (using mRNA instructions to turn one’s own cells into foreign non-self “spike protein factories”) IS the primary mechanism of harm.
For those who are seeking an understanding as to why the injuries from these mRNA transfection injections are so widespread and can greatly vary from person to person:
The modified mRNA-LNP transfection injections genetically instruct one's own cells to become "factories" for the production of foreign non-self proteins...
This triggers an immune system attack response, starting with the Killer T-Lymphocyte cells which will target and destroy one's formerly healthy cells, ANYWHERE in the body, that are now expressing non-self proteins...starting a cascade of damage at the deepest biological/cellular level.
Due to the biodistribution properties of the (toxic & inflammatory) lipid nanoparticles, the encased (designed to be long-lasting) n1-methyl pseudouridine modified mRNA can go anywhere in the body, including crossing the blood-brain and placental barriers...The LNP "delivery vehicles" traveled to different parts of the body in different people.
Expressing any foreign protein is fatal to the cell doing the expressing. The reason is, our bodies are protected by being able to distinguish ourselves from things that shouldn't be there. Anything non-self will trigger immune destruction of the cells & tissues involved.
Some people will express lots of foreign proteins in vulnerable locations. Others express less in less vulnerable areas.
The location of expression defines the adverse event: if you get foreign protein expression in your heart cells, you could get myocarditis & experience cardiac arrest; if the expression is in your brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nervous system, you could get one or more of a variety of neurological conditions; if in your eye, possible blindness; if in your ovaries, possible infertility; if in the placenta, possible miscarriage, stillbirth, or birth defects; if in the endothelial cells that line your blood vessels, possible vascular &/or microvascular injuries like clots/microclots or the long white fibrous clots, leading to strokes, heart attacks, or pulmonary embolisms…
If the expression of foreign proteins is in your own immune cells, you could experience immune dysfunction, dysregulation, & suppression including repeated infections, immune tolerance of a pathogenic foreign protein due to antibody subclass switch to IgG4 & increased IgG4-related diseases, T cell exhaustion, interference with & suppression of innate immunity, persistent systemic inflammation, dysregulation of toll-like receptors and reduced cancer surveillance or the suppression of tumor-suppressing immune system activities & cell-signaling (increasing your risk of fast-growing and aggressive cancers)…
And more…
Pathology reports, including from autopsies, have revealed & confirmed the Killer T Lymphocyte infiltration & destruction of cells, oftentimes in vital organs.
There's no limit to the horrible consequences of injecting into your body something that triggers your own immune system to attack & kill your own formerly healthy cells & tissues.
The public “health” agencies, the COVID “authorities”, & the “mainstream” media fraudulently marketed these experimental mRNA gene “therapy” transfection products as “safe & effective vaccines”. Trusting people thought that they were being presented with the choice (or the mandate) as to whether or not to take a “safe & effective vaccine”…But that was/is a deceptively false “choice”…
The COVID-19 mRNA shots are NOT safe, they are NOT effective, and they are NOT vaccines.
These modified mRNA-LNP gene “therapy” transfection injections never would have passed proper safety studies required for gene therapy products. Safety studies (including biodistribution, immunogenicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, shedding, long-term effects, & more) that were bypassed because of the fraudulent mislabeling as “vaccines”. (And because of the EUA & “countermeasure” designations under the Project BioShield Act & PREP Act in the United States).
The danger is NOT limited to just getting more COVID “boosters”. ANY mRNA (or DNA) gene “therapy” product that transfects your cells and instructs those cells to produce foreign non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) will trigger an immune system attack response against your own cells & tissues (the role of the Killer T-cells is to monitor ALL the cells of the body, ready to destroy/kill any that express foreign, non-self proteins). This makes EVERY mRNA-based (or DNA-based) transfection product harmful by design.
This entirely predictable immune response to one's own cells being instructed to create and express non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) triggers autoimmune responses, and then T-cell exhaustion and immune system dysfunction...regardless of whether or not the foreign protein is toxic itself.
Self vs. Non-self...Basic fundamental Immunology 101...
EVERY SINGLE DOCTOR or medical professional should have been able to recognize the immunological dangers of these mRNA transfection shots...I am still stunned and appalled that so many apparently did/do not...
"While the pharmaceutical industry rushes to expand mRNA use for its speed and profit, a fundamental immunological principle is being overlooked: Any cell that produces a foreign protein is marked for destruction by the immune system.
This isn't theoretical. Clear histopathological evidence from biopsies and autopsies confirms the vaccine's genetic material does not stay at the injection site. It enters systemic circulation and spreads uncontrollably throughout the body, including to vital organs like the brain and heart.
Once there, the body's own cells are forced to produce the foreign antigen, triggering an immune attack on its own tissues."
The undermining of this basic foundational principle of human immunity made the IMMUNOLOGICAL CATASTROPHE of the modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" transfection injections entirely predictable...(and I am not a doctor nor am I in the medical field).
And they can shed on others, making them dangerous and injurious for those who said "Hell NO!" as well...
These transfection injection bioweapons NEVER should have been injected into a single human being...
It is not enough for there to be no mandates...
Tragically, because more people do not understand that this is not about "choice", this is not about the ability to tell others what to do or not...
Because more people are not standing up and demanding that these "traditional" modified mRNA-LNP transfection injections be pulled from the market, the next "evolution" is moving forward (the self amplifying mRNA transfection technology platform)...
Vioxx, 1976 Swine flu shot, Thalidomide, DES, DDT, etc...etc...ALL removed from the market after having previously been approved for use in the USA, or Europe, or wherever...yet now some people are acting like removing a product from the market is unprecedented...
Dangerous, injurious, deadly products must be pulled from the market!!! You do NOT give uninformed or misinformed people the "choice" to use such products.
Especially when their uninformed "consent" leads to them taking a product that sheds and poses a legitimate danger to the health of those being shed on.
Shedding from these transfection injection bioweapons IS an extremely serious concern, with some people being affected more than others...
NO ONE should have ever had the “choice” of taking these gene “therapy” transfection injections because the modified mRNA-LNP genetic transfection technology platform is fundamentally flawed & dangerous by design.
I cannot say it enough: It is NOT enough for there to be no mandates.
I will say again: These transfection injection bioweapons NEVER should have been injected into a single human being.
And as Dr. Sansone has correctly asserted, bioweapons are ALREADY illegal!!
Thank you for sharing this information, Peter. I had not seen that paper. It is incredible that the authors found, as you noted, "that only 14% of those who were tested PCR-positively actually became infected with SARS-CoV-2". This implies that the VAST majority of positive tests failed to correlate with infection, let alone cases of COVID-19, which would be another subset of those who were infected. This suggests that the data used in the papers like the one that I just critiqued are confounded to an even greater degree than what I imagined. I also see that the reference you pointed us to provides yet more evidence to support the common sensical concept that immunity to historical coronaviruses spilled over into cross-protection against SARS-CoV-2. Indeed, telling the world that they were completely immunologically naive to SARS-CoV-2 was a lie. Many people had cross-protection that could prevent severe disease.
Inventor of PCR Explains That it is Not a Test for Infectious Disease
Kerry Mullis won a Noble Prize for the invention of PCR. PCR stands for polymerase chain reaction. It is a process that as its investor states, “make a lot of something from something”. He is on record in this video explaining that PCR is not designed to diagnose any disease. Dr. Anthony Fauci has said PCR is the “Gold Standard” for detection of COVID. He is also quoted as stating if you use too many “amplification cycles” that it will begin to create false positives. If this “Cycle Threshold”, as it is called, is greater than 35 cycles according to Fauci, the results are no longer reliable. I have heard greater than 28 cycles from other experts. The CDC guidance from the beginning of this “pandemic” has been to use 37 to 45 cycles. Tell me how reliable those results are? In my research, cycle thresholds in that range can produce greater than 90% false positives. So we shut down the world economy on a test that is completely unreliable. Pump up the number of infections with a test the produces put wards of 90% false positives. It should also be mentioned that the test cannot tell the difference between COVID and the flu. Amazing how the flu virtually disappeared in the 2020 – 2021 season.
Not only were "proper diagnoses" (of C19) never made, but the figures for "deaths due to Covid" were also essentially meaningless, due to differences in opinions between doctors, health agencies and even countries, but also due to the frankly farcical attribution of any death within a certain time of a positive test (whether the person was symptomatic or not) being "labelled" a Covid death.
Anyone testing positive when brought into the emergency room for a fatal gunshot wound who died and their death attributed to COVID. Heck, if the person had been decapitated and a nasal swab positive for COVID (if the head was found), the death would still be attributed to COVID.
Thank you for explaining this so well! I appreciate your expertise and honesty so much!! I just saw this study posted on CTV news a few days ago. I read the study and noticed that they received grants from pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer. That also should make people question it. I did not know the difference between the disease and the virus….and so ridiculous that they counted vaccinated as “right after getting first shot”. When they compared death and hospitalizations of Covid vaxxed to unvaxxed, they considered you unvaxxed up to 2 weeks after 2nd shot. I’m going to email your very informative article to the author of that CTV news report.
IMA Senior Fellow Dr. Byram Bridle offers a clear and uncompromising analysis of yet another high-profile COVID-19 study—this time from The CORRUPT Lancet.
To be fair to the confused even I referred to SARS-CoV-2 infection as Covid-19 (as did everyone else) up until May 2020 when I first made the distinction between viral infection and the serious illness it could provoke. But the more I look, the more it seems that, in those who get Covid-19 for whatever reason (age, genetics etc) the clinical effects resemble all of the hyperimmune syndromes provoked by other infectious triggers, ranging from bacterial sepsis to Marburg and Ebola. What would be worth researching is exactly why some triggers seem more efficient than others. One presumes that some antigens cause a more violent immune response than others; in reverse, the later SARS-CoV-2 mutations have a less immunogenic spike protein, which is why the risk of Covid-19 has diminished (but the risk of the "vaccines", which still provoke endogenous production of the original, remains high).
The bottom line, though, is that it doesn't matter if you acquire SARS-CoV-2 unless it progresses to Covid-19, a process which is unpredictable but can be tracked by tests and then successfully treated with steroids etc. Vaccination cannot reduce this risk of progression, not least as it causes production of the very antigen that causes Covid-19 - and in unpredictable quantities and for an unpredictable time.
I always learned that infection is when one shows symptoms and colonization is when the pathogen is present but not causing any symptoms or illness. It seems that the author here is distinguishing between infection and colonization when he compares disease to infection. Indeed, doing random PCR tests, even with proper cycle, might show positivity to presence of SARS-Co-2 without showing any symptoms or signs of “disease.” It is a valid point to differentiate between symptomatic “infection” (aka “disease”) and colonization, I.e., presence of SARS-Co-2. Not everyone who has been exposed to and contracted the SAR-Co-2 developed symptoms.
Anyone who simply looked at infection fatality rate data very early on knew healthy youngsters face virtually zero risk of mortality from COVID. The fact that those horrifically dangerous injections are being pushed on them, pointlessly even if they were effective, is beyond tragic. It should be dealt with as criminal negligence.
I agree with one exception. They should be prosecuted for attempted murder.
Consider a complimentary pathway toward COVID accountability:
covidaccountabilitynow.org
Consider recommending anyone you know who was injured by modRNA or was denied informed consent to utilize this free service.
You have it spelt wrong, it's CONVID.
Let me restate what is known about the immunity of the respiratory tracts since at least the 1960s. Vaccines elicit the production of IgG and IgM antibodies in the bloodstream, which do not affect the immunity of the respiratory tract.
The respiratory tract relies on mucous membranes and ciliated epithelium to remove billions of foreign antigens, such as viruses, bacteria, pollen, and dust, that we inhale daily. The primary antibody in the respiratory tract is secretory IgA (sec-IgA), which is non-specific. Vaccinating against influenza, COVID, RSV, and rhinoviruses is just pushing worthless snake oil.
In hindsight, this is likely the reason why every time that I took my GP's advice to get the seasonal flu shot, I got the flu. The natural protection provided by respiratory mucosa is bypassed by injected vaccines.
Next time, please remember that only about 38% of severe respiratory infections can be diagnosed. Among these, the most common viruses are rhinoviruses. Flu viruses are found in very few respiratory infections.
I have learned a lot during the past 5 years. I have focused on prevention by eating well, taking vitamin D during the winter, exercise, etc. I avoided the shots. I experienced what could have been covid in early 2022, but the symptoms were basically a very scratchy throat that lasted for a day.
I have not had a cold/flu/etc in over 3 years.
Just Googled your name and found some good articles that you have published.
Thank you for your insights.
Yes, I heard this from Prof R. Clancy too. If injected ‘vaccines' don’t produce a response in the mucosal membranes then they cannot effectively prevent transmission of the virus. This means that herd immunity cannot be generated by these vaccines. In fact these injections were not even approved for the use of preventing transmission in many jurisdictions.
Many researchers, such as John Ioannidis of Stanford, confuse the role of humoral (antibody) immunity in the blood with that of immunity in the respiratory tract. There is no herd immunity toward respiratory infections.
Norman, what about Pneumonia vaccines? Does the same apply to them?
It took that vaccine about 10 years ago. To my surprise, I later found a study published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews that examined the Prevnar 20 vaccine (by Pfizer!) and showed protection of 0.8%. It's junk, like other infamous medicines and vaccines from this company.
My mother in law was just recommended to take that. I told her to now stay away from any "vacination " they say to take. After 5 years of these kill shots people still are dumb as fuck!
I agree
Thank you. I got the prevnar20 and showed no antibody response. Is the PPSV23 also not worthwhile? What about the shingles vaccine?
It's much worse than that with the mRNA and the lipid nano particle delivery device injecting SV40 directly into your DNA suppressing your ability to recognize cancerous cells produced by these gene editing bio-weapon. This mRNA was never to be used on plants, animals or humans. Who knows what these evil bastards will produce in insects that bite animals and humans. I wouldn't put it past them after Bill Gates and his mosquitoes flying syringes.
You misunderstood Mr. Kevin McKernan's hoax. First, monkey virus SV40 does not infect humans and is not linked to cancer in humans. Second, the plasmid used to produce the vaccine mRNA doesn't contain the virus's complete sequence but only a small fragment.
Nonetheless, the mRNA-based vaccines are toxic and should never be used in humans.
There are studies back in the late 50s early 60s showing sv40 monkey liver not filtered from the polio “vacinne” batch was causing cancers. That was pre LNP. Supposedly with the lnp it allows this sv40 dna a direct path to the dna of those who are unlucky enough to take it. Now the modRNA is another story as it is wiping out the immune system as well as the bodies ability to fight cancers. SV40 is not a virus.
That's all fake science. Do you have a background in biology? I do not think so. Do you know that over 90% of papers in biology and medicine are fake?
Where is the best source of studies that you utilize? Pubmed?
More fake science
https://substack.com/@drwojakmd/note/c-181365316?
So the bio-weapon is fake science? And the mRNA is fake science? Is the Wuhan lab fake science and all the bio-weapon labs in Canada, Ukraine and US all fake science? Are the jabs all fake science? Or were those intentionally done to remove people from this earth? Were pcr tests fake and only utilized for DNA database or were they too spiked with another variety of poison. I see you have many many years of exactly this experience. You would be the best to help answer these questions because I've had enough of these mercenaries that are called doctors lying to me and my family.
There never were man-made bioweapons. How would you test a bioweapon?
I know enough after 5 years that this mRNA is poison and read enough but always open to learn more.
The scariest thing you said, in my opinion is “remarkably, the discussion section contains a WARNING that the data are not to be used to question the conclusion that the shots are awesome.” “It is going to become a major issue if these statements are allowed in publications and then regurgitated uncontested in court.
Ok, the first part reveals to me the authoritarian nature of the discussion section. It’s reminiscent of what occurred during the first couple of years or so. Is this pharma showing their true colours out in the open with the government’s backing? What happens if the warning is not heeded? More career destroying attacks? This is insane, what the hell is going on? Back when we all thought we were going to be killed by the virus, I understand the government backing the shot but this is a whole new ballgame. Does the government toe the line for pharma?
When you say regurgitated uncontested in court. Who would be suing who? It does really look like the courts support the government. Honestly, it feels like we are living in a dictatorship run by very wealthy and influential people, because it’s all about the profit and the control to keep that profit pouring in.
I'm going to get straight to the point, the government and health establishment are controlled by globalists technocrats and want you dead.
Thank you Dr. Bridle for continuing to enlighten us and push back against the flawed science. I find the strongest argument for others (and for myself) is that the COVID vaccines do not reduce - indeed they INCREASE - the rate of COVID infection. There are now 8 peer-reviewed studies saying so, showing "negative efficacy" (what an Orwellian term!). We should repeat this in every discussion of pros and cons. Because even if the infection has an adverse outcome, every multi-boostered person will be exposing themselves to MORE infections and therefore more adverse outcomes. Six of the studies showing 'negative efficacy' are listed here: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-sixth-study-confirms-negative
These are the other two relevant studies: IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10222767/
Post-vaccination IgG4 and IgG2 class switch associates with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections. https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(25)00067-2/fulltext
which makes it, as designed, a working “delivery vehicle” for bioweapon inserts in the genetic code of sars-cov2. Most especially in the “spike protein” of sars-cov2 - so long as that code is being used to program the mRNA and viral vector “vaccine” platform’s spike antigen production
"...every multi-boostered person will be exposing themselves to MORE infections and therefore more adverse outcomes."
100%
But I think THE strongest argument is that The Biggest Lie of the "COVID vaccine" propaganda is that the mRNA COVID shots are vaccines.
More people need to understand the truth that the "COVID vaccines" are modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" transfection products.
The mRNA transfection platform itself is irreparably flawed & inherently dangerous and the platform itself IS the primary problem.
The mechanism of action (using mRNA instructions to turn one’s own cells into foreign non-self “spike protein factories”) IS the primary mechanism of harm.
For those who are seeking an understanding as to why the injuries from these mRNA transfection injections are so widespread and can greatly vary from person to person:
The modified mRNA-LNP transfection injections genetically instruct one's own cells to become "factories" for the production of foreign non-self proteins...
This triggers an immune system attack response, starting with the Killer T-Lymphocyte cells which will target and destroy one's formerly healthy cells, ANYWHERE in the body, that are now expressing non-self proteins...starting a cascade of damage at the deepest biological/cellular level.
Due to the biodistribution properties of the (toxic & inflammatory) lipid nanoparticles, the encased (designed to be long-lasting) n1-methyl pseudouridine modified mRNA can go anywhere in the body, including crossing the blood-brain and placental barriers...The LNP "delivery vehicles" traveled to different parts of the body in different people.
Expressing any foreign protein is fatal to the cell doing the expressing. The reason is, our bodies are protected by being able to distinguish ourselves from things that shouldn't be there. Anything non-self will trigger immune destruction of the cells & tissues involved.
Some people will express lots of foreign proteins in vulnerable locations. Others express less in less vulnerable areas.
The location of expression defines the adverse event: if you get foreign protein expression in your heart cells, you could get myocarditis & experience cardiac arrest; if the expression is in your brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nervous system, you could get one or more of a variety of neurological conditions; if in your eye, possible blindness; if in your ovaries, possible infertility; if in the placenta, possible miscarriage, stillbirth, or birth defects; if in the endothelial cells that line your blood vessels, possible vascular &/or microvascular injuries like clots/microclots or the long white fibrous clots, leading to strokes, heart attacks, or pulmonary embolisms…
If the expression of foreign proteins is in your own immune cells, you could experience immune dysfunction, dysregulation, & suppression including repeated infections, immune tolerance of a pathogenic foreign protein due to antibody subclass switch to IgG4 & increased IgG4-related diseases, T cell exhaustion, interference with & suppression of innate immunity, persistent systemic inflammation, dysregulation of toll-like receptors and reduced cancer surveillance or the suppression of tumor-suppressing immune system activities & cell-signaling (increasing your risk of fast-growing and aggressive cancers)…
And more…
Pathology reports, including from autopsies, have revealed & confirmed the Killer T Lymphocyte infiltration & destruction of cells, oftentimes in vital organs.
There's no limit to the horrible consequences of injecting into your body something that triggers your own immune system to attack & kill your own formerly healthy cells & tissues.
The public “health” agencies, the COVID “authorities”, & the “mainstream” media fraudulently marketed these experimental mRNA gene “therapy” transfection products as “safe & effective vaccines”. Trusting people thought that they were being presented with the choice (or the mandate) as to whether or not to take a “safe & effective vaccine”…But that was/is a deceptively false “choice”…
The COVID-19 mRNA shots are NOT safe, they are NOT effective, and they are NOT vaccines.
These modified mRNA-LNP gene “therapy” transfection injections never would have passed proper safety studies required for gene therapy products. Safety studies (including biodistribution, immunogenicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, shedding, long-term effects, & more) that were bypassed because of the fraudulent mislabeling as “vaccines”. (And because of the EUA & “countermeasure” designations under the Project BioShield Act & PREP Act in the United States).
The danger is NOT limited to just getting more COVID “boosters”. ANY mRNA (or DNA) gene “therapy” product that transfects your cells and instructs those cells to produce foreign non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) will trigger an immune system attack response against your own cells & tissues (the role of the Killer T-cells is to monitor ALL the cells of the body, ready to destroy/kill any that express foreign, non-self proteins). This makes EVERY mRNA-based (or DNA-based) transfection product harmful by design.
This entirely predictable immune response to one's own cells being instructed to create and express non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) triggers autoimmune responses, and then T-cell exhaustion and immune system dysfunction...regardless of whether or not the foreign protein is toxic itself.
Self vs. Non-self...Basic fundamental Immunology 101...
EVERY SINGLE DOCTOR or medical professional should have been able to recognize the immunological dangers of these mRNA transfection shots...I am still stunned and appalled that so many apparently did/do not...
https://entwine.substack.com/p/the-platform-is-deadly
https://robertchandler.substack.com/p/vaccinated-dead-kruger-lang-morz
https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1981375686251069797
"While the pharmaceutical industry rushes to expand mRNA use for its speed and profit, a fundamental immunological principle is being overlooked: Any cell that produces a foreign protein is marked for destruction by the immune system.
This isn't theoretical. Clear histopathological evidence from biopsies and autopsies confirms the vaccine's genetic material does not stay at the injection site. It enters systemic circulation and spreads uncontrollably throughout the body, including to vital organs like the brain and heart.
Once there, the body's own cells are forced to produce the foreign antigen, triggering an immune attack on its own tissues."
The undermining of this basic foundational principle of human immunity made the IMMUNOLOGICAL CATASTROPHE of the modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" transfection injections entirely predictable...(and I am not a doctor nor am I in the medical field).
And they can shed on others, making them dangerous and injurious for those who said "Hell NO!" as well...
These transfection injection bioweapons NEVER should have been injected into a single human being...
It is not enough for there to be no mandates...
Tragically, because more people do not understand that this is not about "choice", this is not about the ability to tell others what to do or not...
Because more people are not standing up and demanding that these "traditional" modified mRNA-LNP transfection injections be pulled from the market, the next "evolution" is moving forward (the self amplifying mRNA transfection technology platform)...
https://www.drtrozzi.news/p/world-council-for-health-the-dangers
Vioxx, 1976 Swine flu shot, Thalidomide, DES, DDT, etc...etc...ALL removed from the market after having previously been approved for use in the USA, or Europe, or wherever...yet now some people are acting like removing a product from the market is unprecedented...
Dangerous, injurious, deadly products must be pulled from the market!!! You do NOT give uninformed or misinformed people the "choice" to use such products.
Especially when their uninformed "consent" leads to them taking a product that sheds and poses a legitimate danger to the health of those being shed on.
Shedding from these transfection injection bioweapons IS an extremely serious concern, with some people being affected more than others...
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of
https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/shedding-of-covid-mrna-vaccine-components
(This is part 1 of a 9 part series - other parts linked at the end of the part 1 article)...
AND...if all of this is not already horrific enough, there are legitimate concerns that the blood supply is contaminated:
https://x.com/Safe_Blood3/status/1942237297035899370
https://vesavanhatupa.substack.com/p/a-call-to-action-lets-end-the-silence
https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/the-devil-was-hard-at-work-trying
https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/results-of-the-2024-worldwide-embalmer
NO ONE should have ever had the “choice” of taking these gene “therapy” transfection injections because the modified mRNA-LNP genetic transfection technology platform is fundamentally flawed & dangerous by design.
I cannot say it enough: It is NOT enough for there to be no mandates.
I will say again: These transfection injection bioweapons NEVER should have been injected into a single human being.
And as Dr. Sansone has correctly asserted, bioweapons are ALREADY illegal!!
https://www.josephsansone.com/p/breaking-news-ain-tribunal-order
Atrocities have been committed...these were/are crimes against humanity.
Thank you for speaking the truth Dr.
We have been lied to for a long time.
All vaccines are bad for us. There is a cure for Cancer. Many prescription drugs are bad for us.
God Bless You
It should be noted that one recent study did investiagte the relation between positive PCR and seroconversion, finding that only 1 in 7 positive PCR's was associated with seroconversion: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/full
Thank you for sharing this information, Peter. I had not seen that paper. It is incredible that the authors found, as you noted, "that only 14% of those who were tested PCR-positively actually became infected with SARS-CoV-2". This implies that the VAST majority of positive tests failed to correlate with infection, let alone cases of COVID-19, which would be another subset of those who were infected. This suggests that the data used in the papers like the one that I just critiqued are confounded to an even greater degree than what I imagined. I also see that the reference you pointed us to provides yet more evidence to support the common sensical concept that immunity to historical coronaviruses spilled over into cross-protection against SARS-CoV-2. Indeed, telling the world that they were completely immunologically naive to SARS-CoV-2 was a lie. Many people had cross-protection that could prevent severe disease.
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/pfizers-mrna-flu-jab-flops?img=https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F41aca5be-04bc-45ba-8e2d-0deaeae17551_1024x575.webp&open=false
https://substack.com/@stopthoseshots/note/c-180092180?
Inventor of PCR Explains That it is Not a Test for Infectious Disease
Kerry Mullis won a Noble Prize for the invention of PCR. PCR stands for polymerase chain reaction. It is a process that as its investor states, “make a lot of something from something”. He is on record in this video explaining that PCR is not designed to diagnose any disease. Dr. Anthony Fauci has said PCR is the “Gold Standard” for detection of COVID. He is also quoted as stating if you use too many “amplification cycles” that it will begin to create false positives. If this “Cycle Threshold”, as it is called, is greater than 35 cycles according to Fauci, the results are no longer reliable. I have heard greater than 28 cycles from other experts. The CDC guidance from the beginning of this “pandemic” has been to use 37 to 45 cycles. Tell me how reliable those results are? In my research, cycle thresholds in that range can produce greater than 90% false positives. So we shut down the world economy on a test that is completely unreliable. Pump up the number of infections with a test the produces put wards of 90% false positives. It should also be mentioned that the test cannot tell the difference between COVID and the flu. Amazing how the flu virtually disappeared in the 2020 – 2021 season.
https://oceanianow.com/2021/10/11/kerry-mullis-phd-inventor-of-pcr-explains-that-it-is-not-test-for-disease/
According to CDC:
Vaccinated with first dose does not mean fully vaccinated.
Wait at least 14 days for second dose. While in that time period you'll be considered unvaccinated.
Receive 2nd dose. You'll still be considered unvaccinated for at least another 14 days.
Time from first dose to date that CDC considers recipient fully vaccinated? At least a month.
If an adverse event occurs within that timeline, recipient will be counted as "unvaccinated".
https://panagispolykretis.substack.com/p/this-paper-will-shock-the-world-unveiling
"Unveiling hidden biases that inflated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety
How misclassification of early post-vaccination deaths distorts mortality rates and public health assessments"
Not only were "proper diagnoses" (of C19) never made, but the figures for "deaths due to Covid" were also essentially meaningless, due to differences in opinions between doctors, health agencies and even countries, but also due to the frankly farcical attribution of any death within a certain time of a positive test (whether the person was symptomatic or not) being "labelled" a Covid death.
If it wasn't so serious it'd be laughable.
Anyone testing positive when brought into the emergency room for a fatal gunshot wound who died and their death attributed to COVID. Heck, if the person had been decapitated and a nasal swab positive for COVID (if the head was found), the death would still be attributed to COVID.
Thank you for explaining this so well! I appreciate your expertise and honesty so much!! I just saw this study posted on CTV news a few days ago. I read the study and noticed that they received grants from pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer. That also should make people question it. I did not know the difference between the disease and the virus….and so ridiculous that they counted vaccinated as “right after getting first shot”. When they compared death and hospitalizations of Covid vaxxed to unvaxxed, they considered you unvaxxed up to 2 weeks after 2nd shot. I’m going to email your very informative article to the author of that CTV news report.
PharMA prostitutes.. Just like Stanley Ploktin
IMA Senior Fellow Dr. Byram Bridle offers a clear and uncompromising analysis of yet another high-profile COVID-19 study—this time from The CORRUPT Lancet.
Thank you!!
Wow. They got it badly wrong—probably on purpose.
To be fair to the confused even I referred to SARS-CoV-2 infection as Covid-19 (as did everyone else) up until May 2020 when I first made the distinction between viral infection and the serious illness it could provoke. But the more I look, the more it seems that, in those who get Covid-19 for whatever reason (age, genetics etc) the clinical effects resemble all of the hyperimmune syndromes provoked by other infectious triggers, ranging from bacterial sepsis to Marburg and Ebola. What would be worth researching is exactly why some triggers seem more efficient than others. One presumes that some antigens cause a more violent immune response than others; in reverse, the later SARS-CoV-2 mutations have a less immunogenic spike protein, which is why the risk of Covid-19 has diminished (but the risk of the "vaccines", which still provoke endogenous production of the original, remains high).
The bottom line, though, is that it doesn't matter if you acquire SARS-CoV-2 unless it progresses to Covid-19, a process which is unpredictable but can be tracked by tests and then successfully treated with steroids etc. Vaccination cannot reduce this risk of progression, not least as it causes production of the very antigen that causes Covid-19 - and in unpredictable quantities and for an unpredictable time.
Thanks Dr. Bridle, you are an inspiration to me. The sad part is the public will fall for the exact same playbook again, or sometimes similar.
I always learned that infection is when one shows symptoms and colonization is when the pathogen is present but not causing any symptoms or illness. It seems that the author here is distinguishing between infection and colonization when he compares disease to infection. Indeed, doing random PCR tests, even with proper cycle, might show positivity to presence of SARS-Co-2 without showing any symptoms or signs of “disease.” It is a valid point to differentiate between symptomatic “infection” (aka “disease”) and colonization, I.e., presence of SARS-Co-2. Not everyone who has been exposed to and contracted the SAR-Co-2 developed symptoms.
Thank you for that clarifying term, 'colonization'.
Stop damaging children.