Good! I always felt that you never got proper credit for pointing this out early on in this whole thing. Others with a bigger public following would mention it and sometimes even let it be implied that they had discovered it. Nice to see you get some recognition!
So do you have the original J biodistribution document? You might want to ask the J why they deleted it from their website. Maybe they just updated their site. You know how it is. Maybe they have a dog that ate it.
Yes, I have an original copy of the Japanese version of the biodistribution study. That is what allowed me to connect the dots and identify several instances of scientific fraud once the FDA was ordered by a court to release their version. I guess the FDA assumed that nobody would put the two documents side by side for comparison. The timing of the removal of the document from the Japanese government's website so shortly after the FDA released theirs certainly appears suspicious.
The reason I asked was because I have the early version (1.pdf), too–––and now the later version (2.pdf). I thought they deleted that one document referenced in the Epoch Times article, but they actually renamed it and there are 11 documents in total in the set, according to the url below. Some blacked out areas in 1.pdf versions that were still under consideration were removed in 2.pdf versions. It seems to be standard practice. If this is the case they were not "removed" after all.
If you need help understanding any J just drop me a PM (J-E translator 30 yrs). To my knowledge the BD was only shown to J in E. No money for translation?
The E version of the comments on X from the above follow:
-----------------
As of September 15, 2022, the page was linked to “672212000_30300AMX00231_G100_1.pdf,” but at some point, it appears to have been replaced with “672212000_30300AMX00231_G100_2.pdf.”
-----------------
Pfizer data with five times more exclusions. The Japanese version has appeared, but even when checked on Wayback, only the November 30 archive is available. However, since the URL usually changes midway, I assumed the same applied here and changed the last number in the address to “1” to search. Bingo — the oldest archive is from March 15, 2021.
-----------------
According to Pfizer’s “Overall Clinical Evaluation” available at the PMDA, the final number of COVID-19 cases was 9 in the vaccination group and 169 in the placebo group, out of approximately 18,000 participants per group.
However, those who tested NAAT-positive (including PCR-positive) or had an unknown status up to 7 days after the second dose were labeled as “major protocol deviations”⁉️ and excluded from the evaluation. The numbers excluded were 302 in the vaccination group and 52 in the placebo group.
Are you kidding me?
-----------------
Steve Anderson knew what they were expecting and in his October 22, 2020 presentation chose to flick past the possible adverse event outcomes. Start at 2:33:39.
I just found out about the fundraiser for Dr. Bridle and his family. I wanted to post here in case anyone checks the comments. It appears there is one running on GoFundMe, and one on GiveSendGo. Consider donating and choose whichever platform you prefer.
Good! I always felt that you never got proper credit for pointing this out early on in this whole thing. Others with a bigger public following would mention it and sometimes even let it be implied that they had discovered it. Nice to see you get some recognition!
So do you have the original J biodistribution document? You might want to ask the J why they deleted it from their website. Maybe they just updated their site. You know how it is. Maybe they have a dog that ate it.
Hi Richard,
Yes, I have an original copy of the Japanese version of the biodistribution study. That is what allowed me to connect the dots and identify several instances of scientific fraud once the FDA was ordered by a court to release their version. I guess the FDA assumed that nobody would put the two documents side by side for comparison. The timing of the removal of the document from the Japanese government's website so shortly after the FDA released theirs certainly appears suspicious.
Thanks for your work.
Timeline below with April 2021 links to Japanese study
https://totalityofevidence.com/dr-byram-bridle/
Thank you so much for your work!
The reason I asked was because I have the early version (1.pdf), too–––and now the later version (2.pdf). I thought they deleted that one document referenced in the Epoch Times article, but they actually renamed it and there are 11 documents in total in the set, according to the url below. Some blacked out areas in 1.pdf versions that were still under consideration were removed in 2.pdf versions. It seems to be standard practice. If this is the case they were not "removed" after all.
-----------------
https://note-com.translate.goog/005up/n/nc8ccae881710?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp&_x_tr_hist=true
If you need help understanding any J just drop me a PM (J-E translator 30 yrs). To my knowledge the BD was only shown to J in E. No money for translation?
The E version of the comments on X from the above follow:
-----------------
As of September 15, 2022, the page was linked to “672212000_30300AMX00231_G100_1.pdf,” but at some point, it appears to have been replaced with “672212000_30300AMX00231_G100_2.pdf.”
-----------------
Pfizer data with five times more exclusions. The Japanese version has appeared, but even when checked on Wayback, only the November 30 archive is available. However, since the URL usually changes midway, I assumed the same applied here and changed the last number in the address to “1” to search. Bingo — the oldest archive is from March 15, 2021.
-----------------
According to Pfizer’s “Overall Clinical Evaluation” available at the PMDA, the final number of COVID-19 cases was 9 in the vaccination group and 169 in the placebo group, out of approximately 18,000 participants per group.
However, those who tested NAAT-positive (including PCR-positive) or had an unknown status up to 7 days after the second dose were labeled as “major protocol deviations”⁉️ and excluded from the evaluation. The numbers excluded were 302 in the vaccination group and 52 in the placebo group.
Are you kidding me?
-----------------
Steve Anderson knew what they were expecting and in his October 22, 2020 presentation chose to flick past the possible adverse event outcomes. Start at 2:33:39.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XTiL9rUpkg
Nice of him to share this info with the world.
BNT162b2 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports
APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST (Nov 2021)
Gene jab is still being pushed in J and people are masked in their cars even out in the mountains.
Zerohedge details:
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/pfizer-left-covid-19-vaccine-data-out-submissions-fda-documents-show
Which copy did Health Canada receive? Do you know?
I just found out about the fundraiser for Dr. Bridle and his family. I wanted to post here in case anyone checks the comments. It appears there is one running on GoFundMe, and one on GiveSendGo. Consider donating and choose whichever platform you prefer.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/byram-bridle-and-family
https://www.givesendgo.com/byrambridle