You mentioned several times "to combat vaccine hesitancy". But do we really want to combat vaccine hesitancy? Isn't a pause and think and learn more approach the way to go? Especially after all we've learned over the last few years, and continue to learn?
Yes, I agree with you. My approach is to identify all the issues that need to be addressed if people are to be expected to make fully informed choices. There are so many issues (hence the multiple references to research that could help alleviate vaccine hesitancy) that the logical approach would be to focus on research that properly and transparently addresses these. As I always like to say, a good product will sell itself. I am a vaccinologist who has been accused of being anti-vax and promoting vaccine hesitancy. The opposite is true; I promote transparent research and discussions, which would facilitate trust in vaccines if they are genuinely safe and effective. Based on what I have observed and experienced over the past five years, I think people should be hesitant about vaccines. Once a lie has been told, the onus is with the liar to try to restore trust, and the person lied to is not obligated to trust again. This is the mess that has been made by our health regulators by hiding essential information, nefariously manipulating it, and/or lying about it. The onus is now on those pushing the vaccines to try to restore trust. I will keep laying out a roadmap of research that can facilitate the process. It is becoming a very long road back to restoring trust.
Byram, what if the whole concept of intramuscular injection of foreign substances across the immune boundary is a methodology of questionable value, originating from the use of intramuscular injection of opioids in the late 19th century that then was misapplied to "vaccines"? Do we really want to "restore trust" in a flawed approach?
Funny you should ask that...I think that is what Joe Rogan asked Suzanne Humphreys in a recent two hour interview...and her answer...?? Circuitously obtuse?
Last year I listened to a conversation between three doctors who I think are considered experts in that field, Clancy, Dalgleish and Campbell. They explained why you cannot get long term immunity from muscular injections, instead you need sub-cutaneous injections into the lymph system because cells required for immunity are manufactured in lymph nodes not muscles.
Isn't Dalgleish an oncologist and Campbell a nurse educator? Anyway, this subcutaneous tack might be an improvement, but at this stage I'd be asking about experts with skin in the game - it seems that all of the assumptions of vaccinology need to be re-examined, and especially when it comes to "viral" disorders. I am now wary of scientists with the hubris to believe that they can improve on a child's immune system with their needles.
Thanks for well-encapsulated and well-structured piece which was reader-friendly as often I struggle to understand what researchers are trying to say. That there’s always been a strong push to deny or gaslight about any vaccine injury tells us that there’s already pre-existing methods of dealing with vaccine hesitancy which mostly rely on coercion. The pharmaceutical industry invests in vaccine-hesitancy research in both academic and private research facilities worldwide in order to, I believe, increase buy-in and loyalty.
I know someone who clearly had a vaccine injury, TIA, post the first Pfizer dose (as well as another old pathological symptom in a different organ returning after 10+ years); but the doctors never considered it as related. A neurology research professor even explained to this person (back in late 2021 or early 2022) that he’d done research on the vaccine and it didn’t cause such issues. There was not enough information available at that time for him to definitively conclude that. But I do know from friends in research that vaccine-hesitancy is a commonly funded type of research assigned to various groups.
Thank you Dr. Bridle for your tireless efforts in sharing the research. You are appreciated more than you know.
Are there any potential solutions to help with this damage? If the heart inflammation is caused by the spike protein is it possible that nattokinase, bromelain, serrapeptase (proteolytic enzymes) shown to help break down spike protein fragments and fibrin.
Could melatonin, Omega-3 fatty acids and an anti-inflammatory diet be helpful for myocarditis?
The short response to your questions is yes, but only POTENTIALLY, in some cases, and with lots of nuances. Lots of variables need to be considered. For example, things like nattokinase, when inside the body, can non-specifically break down proteins. This means it can get rid of both good and bad proteins. The idea is that the good proteins will be restored upon resumption of dietary intake whereas the bad/toxic ones will not be replenished. In principle, things like nattokinase should work to get rid of things like the spike protein. But much of this is based on early pre-clinical in vitro (using petri dishes and cell culture pates) research where the targets can be bathed in the proposed therapeutic compound.
However, the question is whether things like nattokinase can get to relevant locations in the body and at an adequate concentration. For example, I struggle comprehending how oral intake of nattokinase would get in sufficient quantities to places like the the brain (through the gut, into circulation and past the blood-brain barrier) to have a therapeutic effect. One strategy to circumvent this problem may be to place the whole body into a temporary state of autophagy (self-consumption of proteins), which might be accomplished with a longer-term (e.g., 3-day) fast (note that some people's bodies might not enter a state of autophagy within 3 days; it depends on individual variables like baseline metabolic activity, etc).
Also if a toxic protein were to be the result of theoretical cases of the genetic code of a protein getting incorporated into the genome or a protein from very long-lasting contaminating DNA, it will be replenished in the body, which would require long-term or alternative interventions.
In short, all these interventions have the potential to help. What we need are serious commitments by granting agencies to acknowledge these problems and provide the substantial funding needed to conduct the research to properly understand the underlying mechanisms of harm and design solid evidence-based solutions. In the meantime, I appreciate all the health care professionals that are using existing knowledge to do the best they can do work out protocols.
Hmm, that's good to know about nattokinase, which I've been taking for some time for it's plaque reduction benefits, should any be accumulating. I did read of some in vivo studies. Fortunately didn't take the vaccine though!
The fasting is an interesting approach. I sat around a fire as a perdon from Ukrain told me the story of they had cancer and used yhe Ukrain protocol of severe fasting to deal with cancer. Basicslly starving to the limits . Apparently the body will select its catabolistic demise. I found it so fascinating. It would have been a likely effective strategy leading up to getting vaxxed, gor yhe coersed.
Thank you Dr. Bridle for sharing this research & explaining it so well. You are much appreciated by many for all you have done to help Canadians throughout the covid debacle! Thank you again.
I’ve lost track of how many people I know who are dead from cardiac events or have heart issues. I wonder how many years has their lives been shortened by? 😔
What would be the most common symptoms for such heart damage? My wife has had so many of these shots. I know she recently got an EKG and it was fine. But I do feel like she is "off" in so many ways since getting these shots. She just does not seem like the same person to me.
Note that I am a research scientist, not a clinician, so I would defer to cardiologists. However, textbook-level information from the Cleveland Clinic and American Heart Association suggest that common symptoms could include "chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, rapid or irregular heartbeats, and flu-like symptoms such as fever and body aches. Some individuals may experience no symptoms at all, while others may have severe symptoms that resemble those of a heart attack."
Yes, those are my thoughts exactly as well. I guess if you could say one good thing that came of the past few years it's that now people will question everything we are told "is good for us". At least some people will...
One thing that has always bothered me, Dr. Bridle, is that I rarely see you given credit for your early revelations about the Covid vaccine among the docs and scientists who are lauded, usually from the U.S. Your early revelation of the biodistribution study was critical, and I see others refer to it's findings without giving you any credit. It makes me feel like jumping up and down, waving my hands in the air, and saying, "Hey, look over here, in Canada!".
You're right that Dr. Bridle doesn't get the credit he deserves. But I believe there is more to this story. I will be forever grateful to him for saving my family, thanks to that interview he gave about the bio distribution data from Japan. I doubt my family is the only one he saved. This is the kind of recognition that is mostly invisible, but to me is worth more than any public recognition. It is priceless!
Probably because at the time he was 'fact checked' (ha ha) by lamestream media and of course lamestream media (being a mouthpiece for the government) still will not report the truth.
“….still not report the truth.” Worse than that, mainstream media, adding insult to injury applauded the fact that the most harmful incompetent Canadian medical officials received the Order of Canada for their actions during the darkest period of our country.
Beginning with the once a vaccine promoter but now a firm believer in ALL VACCINES ARE TOXIC POISONS, none are safe nor will they ever be, says Dr. Suzanne Humphries MD in her seminal 2014 book, "Delusions...
This has been reiterated many times by different authors - because it's True.
Thanks so much for your meticulous highlighting of the issue of "science" being poluted by propaganda that has become pervasive in recent years. I don't read a lot of scientific papers but have been astounded at some that I have read, where the abstract/conclusion carry a clear bias either at odds with the actual data presented or with no logical connection. The corruption caused by those with the money is pretty obvious and needs to be called out.
Another interested side note is your point about the "some/all" confusion. Recently I submitted some text (to be included in formal correspondence to a government department) to AI. In checking the result, I discovered that AI had dropped the words "Some of" from the text, resulting in a completely inaccurate statement. Putting on my "conspiracy theory" hat (actually I am wearing the T-shirt as I write), I wonder whether this could be a "marker" of AI usage?
I’m not sure about all Ai platforms currently but I pursued the bias query with chatGPT as it consistently used language against dissent from the established industrial political narrative. Typically citing safety rhetoric in absolute and majority terms whilst framing scientific criticism in subjective and minority terms, downplaying safety concerns at every opportunity. The platform will admit that this is part of its programming reflecting investor interest, and it will flood its response with apologies, corrections and admissions of misleading or incorrect assertions (whilst maintaining as much of what it is apologising about as possible, it doesn’t forgo agenda). However, it will also admit that publicly it will remember nothing of the communication or scientific papers you’ve submitted. It remembers what it’s told to remember by its investors if and when they choose to “update” it. Some of its scientific knowledge on the Covid response is many years out of date.
We basically don’t have actual Ai yet, as it’s communication parameters are set and controlled by humans. In other words it reflects specific human bias, another propaganda tool. Bias and agenda promotion are natural human behaviours, logically functioning best by denying their existence. But …that is only in the context of idiots. At least the current Ai platforms admit to bias and conflict of interest, when humans won’t and still think it’s the best way to promote their interests. This is one of Bridle’s fundamental points, I think, suggesting that transparency will ultimately benefit those currently withholding it. If you want to sell a product and choose to lie about it’s safety, efficacy and reasons for uptake, if you silence any criticism of that product and make a pariah of anyone refusing to take the product, and then the product turns out to be FAULTY …denial might seem the best course in the short term. In the context of idiots. So, a small and very private betrayal of this from “Ai”.
1. Intramuscular injection is just a spectacularly dumb idea from the late 1800s. Cutaneous immunization works, just not always predicably. It is also painful and scars.
2. There was an anticipated rise in all-cause mortality (ACM) that remains and may even continue to increase in the future. This anticipated rise in ACM could have bankrupt many Western nations and is the biological signal being MANAGED with
manslaughter and lies. Many of these lies are told on social media by coordinated liars scripted to in turn promote or oppose other liars on the same script.
3. Modern RNA virology has also been used to strengthen and extend this Illusion. Claiming to find genetic signals in the wild, RNA virology then uses pure quantities of synthetic recombinant DNA or RNA TRANSFECTION in both cell cultures and animal models. This is fraud.
4. Coordinated liars fooled all of us into solving the Mystery of the Novel Virus. "Where did it come from? Who is responsible?" Participating in this Theater (even passively) coerced all of us into accepting several false premises, including that we were all in danger, and that we could be in danger again in the future.
5. RNA cannot be the basis for a pandemic because it has none of the special chemical characteristics that DNA supposedly has. When was the last DNA based pandemic? Gain of Function is a Mythology created by DOD+HHS to make an RNA pandemic biologically plausible. It is not.
6. These injections were actually old technologies-sometimes differentiated as TRANSFORMATION (adenovirus vectors, DNA) and TRANSFECTION (RNA)—that were just renamed and reformulated to be treated as new countermeasures, avoid regulation, and allow for the claiming of new intellectual property. This is fraud for which the PREP act emergency was a required moving part. Now the FDA will now be made irrelevant.
7. There is an irreducibly complex Background of genetic signals around us. A huge percentage but not all of these signals are related to bacteria and bacteriophages. The use of PCR in both virology and medicine make no effort to differentiate from this Background, using neither positive nor negative controls, as well as offering no reference scalar. The continued fraudulent use of PCR as a medical diagnostic creates a valuable medical remnant stream ideal for the Human Genome Project objectives.
8. The Health Freedom Movement can be seen as fake because of decades of failure to realize any of these Truths, especially #1. There are witting and unwitting participants. Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, Paul Offit, Mary Holland, Andrew Wakefield, Polly Tommy, Vincent Racaniello, Pierre Kory, Robert Malone, and Robert F Kennedy are all part of One Malevolent Script. It is that bad.
A good start would be a research study that looks at a reasonably-sized subset of people to gain confidence in whether it is or is not a problem in those without clinical signs. If there is evidence for the latter, then, yes, it would suggest that everyone who got a COVID-19 shot should be entitled to this kind of screening.
In the case of Covid, it seemed to me when the shots were first introduced, that they were not necessary to solve the medical problem (and not a very serious one at that). Instead they addressed a political problem. Governments had painted themselves into a corner with lockdowns and the shots gave them a way out, whether or not they worked in practice. Of course big pharma went gleefully along for the massive profit windfall.
I was hesitant about the mRNA shots originally. Now, due to the un-acknowledged failure of those shots, my trust in the whole edifice of public health is gone. When Teresa Tam gets the Order of Canada I know the debasement of science is not only uncorrected but celebrated.
So much of our life these days is far too complex to figure out myself. I must rely on the expertise of others. I must figure out who is both trustworthy and competent. One simple measure I use to assess advice is that the person giving advice specifically states the limits of their understanding, acknowledges pros and cons and generally uses cautious language. So far, Dr Bridle you pass the test. Keep it up.
This whole covid/mRNA poison charade has been like a long term experiment only using humans instead of mice and when they used mice, most of them died.
"Knowing how to properly read and interpret a scientific publication is important for those who want to develop and/or retain critical thinking skills." - Dr.Byram W. Bridle
. .
This paper, for its diagnostic instruction value and it's remedial suggestions, should form the basis of, and be included in a chapter of all medical textbooks pertaining to diagnosis.
My whole immediate family and I never entered a "vaccine hesitancy" stage. When the C-19 panic-demic started, and before the C-19 injections were released, we very quickly went from vaccine takers to vaccine rejecters (all of them). Now that the veil around all "vaccines" is gradually coming down, we look at our sudden "conversion", as a health and life preserving strategy, which, of course, includes boosting our natural God created immune system. Much of the immune system boosting learned from Dr. Bridle and the others instructing on the Immunology and Infectious Disease course, thanks. As far as being given a diss title from the unhinged anti-intellectual Lib-Dems, please do not label me an 'anti-vaxxer', along with my pronouns of, me, myself, and I, I prefer the title Vaccine Rejecter.
You mentioned several times "to combat vaccine hesitancy". But do we really want to combat vaccine hesitancy? Isn't a pause and think and learn more approach the way to go? Especially after all we've learned over the last few years, and continue to learn?
Hi Debbity,
Yes, I agree with you. My approach is to identify all the issues that need to be addressed if people are to be expected to make fully informed choices. There are so many issues (hence the multiple references to research that could help alleviate vaccine hesitancy) that the logical approach would be to focus on research that properly and transparently addresses these. As I always like to say, a good product will sell itself. I am a vaccinologist who has been accused of being anti-vax and promoting vaccine hesitancy. The opposite is true; I promote transparent research and discussions, which would facilitate trust in vaccines if they are genuinely safe and effective. Based on what I have observed and experienced over the past five years, I think people should be hesitant about vaccines. Once a lie has been told, the onus is with the liar to try to restore trust, and the person lied to is not obligated to trust again. This is the mess that has been made by our health regulators by hiding essential information, nefariously manipulating it, and/or lying about it. The onus is now on those pushing the vaccines to try to restore trust. I will keep laying out a roadmap of research that can facilitate the process. It is becoming a very long road back to restoring trust.
Byram, what if the whole concept of intramuscular injection of foreign substances across the immune boundary is a methodology of questionable value, originating from the use of intramuscular injection of opioids in the late 19th century that then was misapplied to "vaccines"? Do we really want to "restore trust" in a flawed approach?
Are there any traditional vaccines that we can say, with 100% certainty, that they are safe and effective?
Funny you should ask that...I think that is what Joe Rogan asked Suzanne Humphreys in a recent two hour interview...and her answer...?? Circuitously obtuse?
Last year I listened to a conversation between three doctors who I think are considered experts in that field, Clancy, Dalgleish and Campbell. They explained why you cannot get long term immunity from muscular injections, instead you need sub-cutaneous injections into the lymph system because cells required for immunity are manufactured in lymph nodes not muscles.
Isn't Dalgleish an oncologist and Campbell a nurse educator? Anyway, this subcutaneous tack might be an improvement, but at this stage I'd be asking about experts with skin in the game - it seems that all of the assumptions of vaccinology need to be re-examined, and especially when it comes to "viral" disorders. I am now wary of scientists with the hubris to believe that they can improve on a child's immune system with their needles.
Thanks for well-encapsulated and well-structured piece which was reader-friendly as often I struggle to understand what researchers are trying to say. That there’s always been a strong push to deny or gaslight about any vaccine injury tells us that there’s already pre-existing methods of dealing with vaccine hesitancy which mostly rely on coercion. The pharmaceutical industry invests in vaccine-hesitancy research in both academic and private research facilities worldwide in order to, I believe, increase buy-in and loyalty.
I know someone who clearly had a vaccine injury, TIA, post the first Pfizer dose (as well as another old pathological symptom in a different organ returning after 10+ years); but the doctors never considered it as related. A neurology research professor even explained to this person (back in late 2021 or early 2022) that he’d done research on the vaccine and it didn’t cause such issues. There was not enough information available at that time for him to definitively conclude that. But I do know from friends in research that vaccine-hesitancy is a commonly funded type of research assigned to various groups.
Thank you Dr. Bridle for your tireless efforts in sharing the research. You are appreciated more than you know.
Are there any potential solutions to help with this damage? If the heart inflammation is caused by the spike protein is it possible that nattokinase, bromelain, serrapeptase (proteolytic enzymes) shown to help break down spike protein fragments and fibrin.
Could melatonin, Omega-3 fatty acids and an anti-inflammatory diet be helpful for myocarditis?
Hi Dena,
The short response to your questions is yes, but only POTENTIALLY, in some cases, and with lots of nuances. Lots of variables need to be considered. For example, things like nattokinase, when inside the body, can non-specifically break down proteins. This means it can get rid of both good and bad proteins. The idea is that the good proteins will be restored upon resumption of dietary intake whereas the bad/toxic ones will not be replenished. In principle, things like nattokinase should work to get rid of things like the spike protein. But much of this is based on early pre-clinical in vitro (using petri dishes and cell culture pates) research where the targets can be bathed in the proposed therapeutic compound.
However, the question is whether things like nattokinase can get to relevant locations in the body and at an adequate concentration. For example, I struggle comprehending how oral intake of nattokinase would get in sufficient quantities to places like the the brain (through the gut, into circulation and past the blood-brain barrier) to have a therapeutic effect. One strategy to circumvent this problem may be to place the whole body into a temporary state of autophagy (self-consumption of proteins), which might be accomplished with a longer-term (e.g., 3-day) fast (note that some people's bodies might not enter a state of autophagy within 3 days; it depends on individual variables like baseline metabolic activity, etc).
Also if a toxic protein were to be the result of theoretical cases of the genetic code of a protein getting incorporated into the genome or a protein from very long-lasting contaminating DNA, it will be replenished in the body, which would require long-term or alternative interventions.
In short, all these interventions have the potential to help. What we need are serious commitments by granting agencies to acknowledge these problems and provide the substantial funding needed to conduct the research to properly understand the underlying mechanisms of harm and design solid evidence-based solutions. In the meantime, I appreciate all the health care professionals that are using existing knowledge to do the best they can do work out protocols.
Hmm, that's good to know about nattokinase, which I've been taking for some time for it's plaque reduction benefits, should any be accumulating. I did read of some in vivo studies. Fortunately didn't take the vaccine though!
The fasting is an interesting approach. I sat around a fire as a perdon from Ukrain told me the story of they had cancer and used yhe Ukrain protocol of severe fasting to deal with cancer. Basicslly starving to the limits . Apparently the body will select its catabolistic demise. I found it so fascinating. It would have been a likely effective strategy leading up to getting vaxxed, gor yhe coersed.
Thank you ❤️
Thank you Dr. Bridle for sharing this research & explaining it so well. You are much appreciated by many for all you have done to help Canadians throughout the covid debacle! Thank you again.
I’ve lost track of how many people I know who are dead from cardiac events or have heart issues. I wonder how many years has their lives been shortened by? 😔
What would be the most common symptoms for such heart damage? My wife has had so many of these shots. I know she recently got an EKG and it was fine. But I do feel like she is "off" in so many ways since getting these shots. She just does not seem like the same person to me.
Hi Chris,
Note that I am a research scientist, not a clinician, so I would defer to cardiologists. However, textbook-level information from the Cleveland Clinic and American Heart Association suggest that common symptoms could include "chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, rapid or irregular heartbeats, and flu-like symptoms such as fever and body aches. Some individuals may experience no symptoms at all, while others may have severe symptoms that resemble those of a heart attack."
I would read Dr. Jessica Rose's latest Substack for possible clues re: "She is "off"..."
Yes, those are my thoughts exactly as well. I guess if you could say one good thing that came of the past few years it's that now people will question everything we are told "is good for us". At least some people will...
One thing that has always bothered me, Dr. Bridle, is that I rarely see you given credit for your early revelations about the Covid vaccine among the docs and scientists who are lauded, usually from the U.S. Your early revelation of the biodistribution study was critical, and I see others refer to it's findings without giving you any credit. It makes me feel like jumping up and down, waving my hands in the air, and saying, "Hey, look over here, in Canada!".
You're right that Dr. Bridle doesn't get the credit he deserves. But I believe there is more to this story. I will be forever grateful to him for saving my family, thanks to that interview he gave about the bio distribution data from Japan. I doubt my family is the only one he saved. This is the kind of recognition that is mostly invisible, but to me is worth more than any public recognition. It is priceless!
Probably because at the time he was 'fact checked' (ha ha) by lamestream media and of course lamestream media (being a mouthpiece for the government) still will not report the truth.
“….still not report the truth.” Worse than that, mainstream media, adding insult to injury applauded the fact that the most harmful incompetent Canadian medical officials received the Order of Canada for their actions during the darkest period of our country.
Beginning with the once a vaccine promoter but now a firm believer in ALL VACCINES ARE TOXIC POISONS, none are safe nor will they ever be, says Dr. Suzanne Humphries MD in her seminal 2014 book, "Delusions...
This has been reiterated many times by different authors - because it's True.
Period.
Thanks so much for your meticulous highlighting of the issue of "science" being poluted by propaganda that has become pervasive in recent years. I don't read a lot of scientific papers but have been astounded at some that I have read, where the abstract/conclusion carry a clear bias either at odds with the actual data presented or with no logical connection. The corruption caused by those with the money is pretty obvious and needs to be called out.
Another interested side note is your point about the "some/all" confusion. Recently I submitted some text (to be included in formal correspondence to a government department) to AI. In checking the result, I discovered that AI had dropped the words "Some of" from the text, resulting in a completely inaccurate statement. Putting on my "conspiracy theory" hat (actually I am wearing the T-shirt as I write), I wonder whether this could be a "marker" of AI usage?
I’m not sure about all Ai platforms currently but I pursued the bias query with chatGPT as it consistently used language against dissent from the established industrial political narrative. Typically citing safety rhetoric in absolute and majority terms whilst framing scientific criticism in subjective and minority terms, downplaying safety concerns at every opportunity. The platform will admit that this is part of its programming reflecting investor interest, and it will flood its response with apologies, corrections and admissions of misleading or incorrect assertions (whilst maintaining as much of what it is apologising about as possible, it doesn’t forgo agenda). However, it will also admit that publicly it will remember nothing of the communication or scientific papers you’ve submitted. It remembers what it’s told to remember by its investors if and when they choose to “update” it. Some of its scientific knowledge on the Covid response is many years out of date.
We basically don’t have actual Ai yet, as it’s communication parameters are set and controlled by humans. In other words it reflects specific human bias, another propaganda tool. Bias and agenda promotion are natural human behaviours, logically functioning best by denying their existence. But …that is only in the context of idiots. At least the current Ai platforms admit to bias and conflict of interest, when humans won’t and still think it’s the best way to promote their interests. This is one of Bridle’s fundamental points, I think, suggesting that transparency will ultimately benefit those currently withholding it. If you want to sell a product and choose to lie about it’s safety, efficacy and reasons for uptake, if you silence any criticism of that product and make a pariah of anyone refusing to take the product, and then the product turns out to be FAULTY …denial might seem the best course in the short term. In the context of idiots. So, a small and very private betrayal of this from “Ai”.
Thank u Dr. Bridle and Dr. Jess for cross post .
No worries .....the TGA will be all over this ....they follow the science ...🤷🏻♂️🦧🤦
The Summing Up Thanks To Dr. J.J.Couey From Gigaohmbiological.com
1. Intramuscular injection is just a spectacularly dumb idea from the late 1800s. Cutaneous immunization works, just not always predicably. It is also painful and scars.
2. There was an anticipated rise in all-cause mortality (ACM) that remains and may even continue to increase in the future. This anticipated rise in ACM could have bankrupt many Western nations and is the biological signal being MANAGED with
manslaughter and lies. Many of these lies are told on social media by coordinated liars scripted to in turn promote or oppose other liars on the same script.
3. Modern RNA virology has also been used to strengthen and extend this Illusion. Claiming to find genetic signals in the wild, RNA virology then uses pure quantities of synthetic recombinant DNA or RNA TRANSFECTION in both cell cultures and animal models. This is fraud.
4. Coordinated liars fooled all of us into solving the Mystery of the Novel Virus. "Where did it come from? Who is responsible?" Participating in this Theater (even passively) coerced all of us into accepting several false premises, including that we were all in danger, and that we could be in danger again in the future.
5. RNA cannot be the basis for a pandemic because it has none of the special chemical characteristics that DNA supposedly has. When was the last DNA based pandemic? Gain of Function is a Mythology created by DOD+HHS to make an RNA pandemic biologically plausible. It is not.
6. These injections were actually old technologies-sometimes differentiated as TRANSFORMATION (adenovirus vectors, DNA) and TRANSFECTION (RNA)—that were just renamed and reformulated to be treated as new countermeasures, avoid regulation, and allow for the claiming of new intellectual property. This is fraud for which the PREP act emergency was a required moving part. Now the FDA will now be made irrelevant.
7. There is an irreducibly complex Background of genetic signals around us. A huge percentage but not all of these signals are related to bacteria and bacteriophages. The use of PCR in both virology and medicine make no effort to differentiate from this Background, using neither positive nor negative controls, as well as offering no reference scalar. The continued fraudulent use of PCR as a medical diagnostic creates a valuable medical remnant stream ideal for the Human Genome Project objectives.
8. The Health Freedom Movement can be seen as fake because of decades of failure to realize any of these Truths, especially #1. There are witting and unwitting participants. Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, Paul Offit, Mary Holland, Andrew Wakefield, Polly Tommy, Vincent Racaniello, Pierre Kory, Robert Malone, and Robert F Kennedy are all part of One Malevolent Script. It is that bad.
What are practical implications of these findings? Should every recipient of a Covid shot have an NMR heart study?
Hi Lone Star,
A good start would be a research study that looks at a reasonably-sized subset of people to gain confidence in whether it is or is not a problem in those without clinical signs. If there is evidence for the latter, then, yes, it would suggest that everyone who got a COVID-19 shot should be entitled to this kind of screening.
We need that study.
Trouble is that injected Gadolinium chemicals used in the NMR imaging have side effects, including Death.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/heart-fibrosis-caused-by-endotoxin
and
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5851274/
I have heard those problems are greater in the injected.
In the case of Covid, it seemed to me when the shots were first introduced, that they were not necessary to solve the medical problem (and not a very serious one at that). Instead they addressed a political problem. Governments had painted themselves into a corner with lockdowns and the shots gave them a way out, whether or not they worked in practice. Of course big pharma went gleefully along for the massive profit windfall.
I was hesitant about the mRNA shots originally. Now, due to the un-acknowledged failure of those shots, my trust in the whole edifice of public health is gone. When Teresa Tam gets the Order of Canada I know the debasement of science is not only uncorrected but celebrated.
So much of our life these days is far too complex to figure out myself. I must rely on the expertise of others. I must figure out who is both trustworthy and competent. One simple measure I use to assess advice is that the person giving advice specifically states the limits of their understanding, acknowledges pros and cons and generally uses cautious language. So far, Dr Bridle you pass the test. Keep it up.
This whole covid/mRNA poison charade has been like a long term experiment only using humans instead of mice and when they used mice, most of them died.
"Knowing how to properly read and interpret a scientific publication is important for those who want to develop and/or retain critical thinking skills." - Dr.Byram W. Bridle
. .
This paper, for its diagnostic instruction value and it's remedial suggestions, should form the basis of, and be included in a chapter of all medical textbooks pertaining to diagnosis.
My whole immediate family and I never entered a "vaccine hesitancy" stage. When the C-19 panic-demic started, and before the C-19 injections were released, we very quickly went from vaccine takers to vaccine rejecters (all of them). Now that the veil around all "vaccines" is gradually coming down, we look at our sudden "conversion", as a health and life preserving strategy, which, of course, includes boosting our natural God created immune system. Much of the immune system boosting learned from Dr. Bridle and the others instructing on the Immunology and Infectious Disease course, thanks. As far as being given a diss title from the unhinged anti-intellectual Lib-Dems, please do not label me an 'anti-vaxxer', along with my pronouns of, me, myself, and I, I prefer the title Vaccine Rejecter.