I previously wrote about a court case in which an injunction was being sought for relief from a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for healthcare workers in Ontario (see the article here). The injunction was not granted. This case is now being appealed. You can find what is called the ‘factum of the appellant’ below. I am no legal expert, so I have had to learn legal-related lingo as I go. Based on the English dictionary by Oxford Languages…
An appellant is a person (or group of people) who applies to a higher court for a reversal of the decision of a lower court.
A factum is the written argument that is provided to the judges of appeal courts before they listen to the lawyers argue the case.
Here is the factum, which includes the reasons for the appeal on pages 4-5…
On a related note, Dr. Peter Jüni is an epidemiologist who has been paid to serve as the head of the Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table that has been recommending lockdown and mandate policies for the past two years. He was the expert witness for the opposing party in this case. Two interesting news stories about him aired recently. They were done by Tamara Ugolini from Rebel News, which, unlike mainstream media, is a place where traditional journalism is still practiced.
The first news story is here.
The second one can be found at this link.