Interview About Pfizer's Adulterated COVID-19 Shots

It has been two years, three months, and three days (824 total days) since the administration of my employer, the University of Guelph, banned me from accessing my office and laboratory.

- B. Bridle -

Yesterday, on October 25, 2023, I was interviewed by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson about the adulteration of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots. Specifically, this is the issue of Pfizer’s doses being contaminated with bacterial DNA that is not supposed to be there. Worse, the DNA contains bioactive gene sequences, including what is called the ‘SV40 enhancer’, which were never disclosed to health regulatory agencies. Health Canada, in an email to the Epoch Times, has confirmed the presence of the SV40 enhancer in the contaminating DNA. They also confirmed that Pfizer was required to disclose this information to them when submitting its data package for regulatory review. In short, Health Canada was duped by Pfizer and they have confirmed that the COVID-19 shots are an adulterated product.

A link to the interview can be found here.

Remarkably, I have yet to see evidence of state-funded media, like the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, running any stories on this profound revelation. I have no idea why they think it is unimportant to inform every person who received a Pfizer shot that it was an adulterated product. I would want to know. It is very important that everyone who took these shots knows. So, please spread this important news as far and wide as possible. I truly care for the health and well-being of all others. That is the sole reason why I am investing such time and effort into equipping people with information that will allow them to make informed decisions moving forward. It is why I became an expert in health sciences.

I even care deeply about the health and well-being of the ‘misinformation gurus’ that have chosen to try to make my life a misery. I also care deeply about the well-being of their children, other family members, their friends, and their colleagues.

So, before anyone openly accuses me of spreading ‘misinformation’, let’s be clear about one thing…

The literature underpinning 'misinformation science' and 'fact checking' states very clearly that the best way to quench genuine misinformation is to tackle it directly in a public discussion. The so-called 'backfire effect' (the excuse that a public discussion can potentiate misinformation by giving it a 'platform') is invalid. Check out the published peer-reviewed science here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0632-4.

Those who accuse others of spreading false information in the absence of public discussion do the worst harm. Specifically, as per the reference above, which has often been promoted by 'misinformation experts', “not turning up to the discussion at all seems to result in the worst effect [in terms of countering misinformation]” and, consequently, the accusations that have been levelled become illegitimate.

The truth-seeking public has no interest in hypocritical cowards.

---