Jun 23, 2022·edited Jun 23, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
Thank you, I will be saving this for future reference as I'm hearing of more couples facing infertility. I'm curious if the damage to the sperm is just mobility and count? Are we going to see more developmental delays or disabilities in babies of the mRNA vaccinated? Maybe not as obvious as Thalidomide, but more SIDS, cardiac, neurological, endocrine, etc. disorders. Which is why vaccine studies are supposed to be long term. This experimental mRNA on the world is heartbreaking.
I admit that I am not at all a data-analysis guru. However, the allegation that sperm counts and motility return to baseline by T3 seems a little suspect, based on the data in the table 2 on page 14.
Sperm concentration is still -15.9% (range -30% to 1.7%) and motility is -4.1 (range -8.2 to 0.1). Total motility count is -19.4% (range -35% to 0.6%).
To my admittedly simple mind, these numbers are not exactly reassuring. There is a whole lot of negativity there. What if you are one of the guys with a 30% reduction in sperm concentration? That’s hardly “back to normal.”
The authors state that the T3 reductions are “statistically insignificant.” Yeah, well they tested only 36 guys, right. Maybe if they check 360, they would find some statistically significant information. After all, it’s just the future of folks’ abilities to father children that we are talking about. Seems kind of important to follow up on.
What about the issue of using median vs average and the possibility that some % of men never recover sperm count and motility even if they never boost?
Jun 23, 2022·edited Jun 23, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
You'd almost be tempted to think they were trying to trick us into creating fewer human lives. But surely not! I mean, there was that thing in India where Bill Gates has been denied entry because of something peddled over there that sterilized thousands of girls. And the tetenus shots in Africa that made women unable to carry a pregnancy because it took out HCG. But those were mistakes, right? Didn't the Gates Foundation and the Pharmaceutical companies say they were very sorry and promise never to do it again?
People can demand integrity and informed consent, but that does not guarantee that they will get it. Common sense shows the process was rushed and long term effects were not known. Anything after that, is just a gamble.
Therefore, my biggest takeaway is when you state, "You must take responsibility for your own health and that of your family." Being too busy, or not being able to think about it right now because it's too stressful, might be okay for one day, but to use that reasoning over and over again, is not being responsible.
You are the only one who is going to live within your own body for the rest of your life, and people cannot assume that someone is looking at their best interest, or will take care of you or compensate you if something goes wrong; both history and current events show, this isn't happening.
Over the years, I've seen a lot of people go into doctors feeling confident, but they they get razzle dazzled by fancy words, and shamed for not doing what they are told. And they crumble. Unless you are talking to HR at your employer, you don't need to give any reasons whatsoever for why you don't want the shot, or why you aren't getting it for your kid. Just say "No thank you." Say it calmly, and firmly. If they ask you more questions, just repeat yourself. "Oh, no thank you, but I'm happy to take home any supporting literature to that I can discuss with my family."
Keep in mind, they are probably going to put some ICM code in your file to mark you as non-compliant, which is why you should seek a doctor that is supportive of informed consent and medical autonomy.
Thank you Dr. Bridle. I had a thought, what about the young boys who are going through puberty or younger? How could this affect their reproductive growth? This can't be good news.
Jun 23, 2022·edited Jun 23, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
Excellent, clear and well-written explanation of this study. I too am curious about the quality of the sperm. Will the "vaccines" cause damage to the sperm and future progeny? What about the ovaries and the quality of the eggs? I too don't understand why people aren't questioning the past 2 years. Where is your line in the sand? As a former RN, my line was locking down healthy people. We were taught to quarantine people who had symptoms and were sick. I knew something was wrong then. You are right that you see very clearly what is happening once you form that boundary. A very important point of your article is that each person must take responsibility for their health and the health of their children. In Canada we rely heavily on doctors and medications to fix us instead of taking care of ourselves and each other.
If a bolus of LNPs storm the Blood-testis or the blood-epididymal barrier, immune cells will destroy them and permeability of the endothelium will let Tcells in. Likely that sperm cell express hTERT and get attacked.
One of my many concerns when they rolled out the shots… all of these new studies should have and would have been completed if the powers that be actually cared. Sadly they do not. Thank you for your interpretation of the study, great perspective.
So the children receiving this shot from 12 - 18 years old, starting puberty, how might this affect their development?? Or at the age of 5? Heck, what about the infants that have recieved this shot? Time will tell but I can't understand how any parent ignors the risks of the unknown.
Another call to a pharmacy -- same story about them damaging my kid... and not informing us of the risks (beyond a sore shoulder) EXCEPT that I am now finishing with I know you are not giving proper info to people who come in -- so what I am going to do is walk in there and have others I know walk in and ask what the side effects are... and RECORD the conversation.
So you better start informing people cuz if you don't we will have this on a recording and when kids or adults get damaged - we will come after you for not giving them proper information and we'll be seeking damages.
What I recommend is people actually go to pharmacies - ask for the side effects - record what they say -- then inform them that they MUST give proper information to EVERYONE otherwise we now have evidence that you did not disclose the risks -- and when the next kid/adult gets damaged... we come after you for damages.
You want an easy way to stop the carnage - I just gave it to you --- now take action.
Thank you, I will be saving this for future reference as I'm hearing of more couples facing infertility. I'm curious if the damage to the sperm is just mobility and count? Are we going to see more developmental delays or disabilities in babies of the mRNA vaccinated? Maybe not as obvious as Thalidomide, but more SIDS, cardiac, neurological, endocrine, etc. disorders. Which is why vaccine studies are supposed to be long term. This experimental mRNA on the world is heartbreaking.
I admit that I am not at all a data-analysis guru. However, the allegation that sperm counts and motility return to baseline by T3 seems a little suspect, based on the data in the table 2 on page 14.
Sperm concentration is still -15.9% (range -30% to 1.7%) and motility is -4.1 (range -8.2 to 0.1). Total motility count is -19.4% (range -35% to 0.6%).
To my admittedly simple mind, these numbers are not exactly reassuring. There is a whole lot of negativity there. What if you are one of the guys with a 30% reduction in sperm concentration? That’s hardly “back to normal.”
The authors state that the T3 reductions are “statistically insignificant.” Yeah, well they tested only 36 guys, right. Maybe if they check 360, they would find some statistically significant information. After all, it’s just the future of folks’ abilities to father children that we are talking about. Seems kind of important to follow up on.
What about the issue of using median vs average and the possibility that some % of men never recover sperm count and motility even if they never boost?
You'd almost be tempted to think they were trying to trick us into creating fewer human lives. But surely not! I mean, there was that thing in India where Bill Gates has been denied entry because of something peddled over there that sterilized thousands of girls. And the tetenus shots in Africa that made women unable to carry a pregnancy because it took out HCG. But those were mistakes, right? Didn't the Gates Foundation and the Pharmaceutical companies say they were very sorry and promise never to do it again?
People can demand integrity and informed consent, but that does not guarantee that they will get it. Common sense shows the process was rushed and long term effects were not known. Anything after that, is just a gamble.
Therefore, my biggest takeaway is when you state, "You must take responsibility for your own health and that of your family." Being too busy, or not being able to think about it right now because it's too stressful, might be okay for one day, but to use that reasoning over and over again, is not being responsible.
You are the only one who is going to live within your own body for the rest of your life, and people cannot assume that someone is looking at their best interest, or will take care of you or compensate you if something goes wrong; both history and current events show, this isn't happening.
Now THIS is the kind of dispassionate, fact-based disclosure of what is happening that should resonate with those who are open to discussion.
For those who aren’t, many of us will wait patiently until you too start to question the “safe and effective” narrative.
Bravo Dr. Bridle!!
Another great, well-written article. Thanks Dr. B!
Over the years, I've seen a lot of people go into doctors feeling confident, but they they get razzle dazzled by fancy words, and shamed for not doing what they are told. And they crumble. Unless you are talking to HR at your employer, you don't need to give any reasons whatsoever for why you don't want the shot, or why you aren't getting it for your kid. Just say "No thank you." Say it calmly, and firmly. If they ask you more questions, just repeat yourself. "Oh, no thank you, but I'm happy to take home any supporting literature to that I can discuss with my family."
Keep in mind, they are probably going to put some ICM code in your file to mark you as non-compliant, which is why you should seek a doctor that is supportive of informed consent and medical autonomy.
Thank you Dr. Bridle. I had a thought, what about the young boys who are going through puberty or younger? How could this affect their reproductive growth? This can't be good news.
Excellent, clear and well-written explanation of this study. I too am curious about the quality of the sperm. Will the "vaccines" cause damage to the sperm and future progeny? What about the ovaries and the quality of the eggs? I too don't understand why people aren't questioning the past 2 years. Where is your line in the sand? As a former RN, my line was locking down healthy people. We were taught to quarantine people who had symptoms and were sick. I knew something was wrong then. You are right that you see very clearly what is happening once you form that boundary. A very important point of your article is that each person must take responsibility for their health and the health of their children. In Canada we rely heavily on doctors and medications to fix us instead of taking care of ourselves and each other.
Hi Byram,
I mentioned that risk a few weeks ago here:
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/can-vaccines-be-dangerous-to-pregnant
If a bolus of LNPs storm the Blood-testis or the blood-epididymal barrier, immune cells will destroy them and permeability of the endothelium will let Tcells in. Likely that sperm cell express hTERT and get attacked.
My 2 cents. Best. Marc
One of my many concerns when they rolled out the shots… all of these new studies should have and would have been completed if the powers that be actually cared. Sadly they do not. Thank you for your interpretation of the study, great perspective.
So the children receiving this shot from 12 - 18 years old, starting puberty, how might this affect their development?? Or at the age of 5? Heck, what about the infants that have recieved this shot? Time will tell but I can't understand how any parent ignors the risks of the unknown.
thanks for all you do
Thank you for keeping us updated in this ongoing issue and for new information as it becomes available.
Another call to a pharmacy -- same story about them damaging my kid... and not informing us of the risks (beyond a sore shoulder) EXCEPT that I am now finishing with I know you are not giving proper info to people who come in -- so what I am going to do is walk in there and have others I know walk in and ask what the side effects are... and RECORD the conversation.
So you better start informing people cuz if you don't we will have this on a recording and when kids or adults get damaged - we will come after you for not giving them proper information and we'll be seeking damages.
What I recommend is people actually go to pharmacies - ask for the side effects - record what they say -- then inform them that they MUST give proper information to EVERYONE otherwise we now have evidence that you did not disclose the risks -- and when the next kid/adult gets damaged... we come after you for damages.
You want an easy way to stop the carnage - I just gave it to you --- now take action.