COVID-19 Shots: Canada's Agreement with Pfizer
It has been two years, three months, and twenty-four days (845 total days) since the administration of my employer, the University of Guelph, banned me from accessing my office and laboratory.
- B. Bridle -
The Canadian Independent (here are their links for YouTube, Substack, and Rumble) did a great job of obtaining a copy of Pfizer Canada’s Manufacturing and Supply Agreement that the Canadian government approved. Specifically, this is the agreement for Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot. It was just made public. Here is a PDF version…
I have not had a chance to read it over in detail because I am preparing to go to Bucharest, Romania, to testify in the Romanian parliament about ”Censorship Under the Guise of Public Health” as part of the International Crisis Summit 4. However, I do not want to delay its release to you. I welcome everyone to review it for themselves.
One section of text that was brought to my attention by BrightLight News was this…
"Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known." - page 18 -
Of course, this does not surprise me nor will it surprise most readers. However, to see that the government signed off on this on October 26, 2020 caused me to reminisce about the public messaging with respect to this product. Right from the beginning, Health Canada claimed that they knew the product to be "safe and effective".
Notably, this disclaimer from Pfizer proved to be important because the effectiveness of the shots came nowhere close to meeting Health Canada’s definition of an ideal vaccine. Further, many adverse effects, including very serious ones (like myocarditis), were indeed discovered via the grand experiment that was conducted with the Canadian public. Plus, there are still-emerging safety signals (such as changes to the menstrual cycle and pathological vaginal bleeding in girls and women of all ages).
I'd love to see a representative for Health Canada try to defend their confident and never-ending regurgitation of the “safe and effective” mantra alongside the text quoted above, and to do so in the context of their apparent promotion of 'fully informed consent'.
Perhaps “the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known” and “there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known“ didn’t provide a great optic on consent forms, nor as a preface for mandates.
For example, Ontario, Canada’s consent form is here…
It provides no information about the shots. Instead, it puts the onus on the recipient to educate themselves, should they choose to, as indicated in this text…
“I acknowledge that I have had the opportunity to ask questions regarding the vaccine I am receiving and have had them answered to my satisfaction.“
Many people didn’t know what questions to ask.
Most people providing answers lacked expertise in the complex fields of science underlying these shots.
Most people regurgitated answers based on their superficial understanding of what the textbook description of an ‘ideal vaccine’ is.
Many people providing answers disseminated misinformation.
It seems to me that the government of Canada threw the principle of informed consent out the window of the plane that the healthy ‘unvaccinated’ (many of whom had superior naturally acquired immunity) were not allowed on.
Are Canadians, regardless of their opinions of the COVID-19 shots, okay with ‘informed consent’ being disposed of?
Are those who took the shots okay with seeing with their own eyes that the government of Canada agreed to adopt the risks of unknown long-term effectiveness and unknown long-term safety on their behalf without telling them?
…and then to only use a highly flawed passive monitoring system that dramatically underestimates harms, especially those that are long-term?
Don’t worry Pfizer, we accept that the shots might prove to be crap in the long-term. We also know there is the possibility that bad things might happen to people. We’ll just seal this document behind closed doors so the public can’t see it (and hopefully won’t ask to see it) and then tell everyone that we have every confidence that the shots are ‘safe and effective’. We look forward to conducting our own nation-wide experiment in the context of our public rollout to test the long-term effectiveness and safety that used to be done in highly controlled clinical trials over a period of a decade or more. And if bad things do happen to anybody you can try to use this piece of paper in court to get off the hook and blame us so the taxpayers can pay for any problems that taxpayers experience. After all, Health Canada diligently serves the Canadian public who don’t provide us with our operating budget. Oh, and thank you, Pfizer, for your payments of half-a-million dollars per application that we review. How could we possibly look out for the best interests of Canadians if we didn’t have you paying us to do so?!?
- The government of Canada -
during the pandemic, i had to take a PCR test for a small job. i asked the woman (morbidly obese and wearing false eyelashes so long they could have served as social distancers) who was administering the test, what cycle threshold it was being run at. she obviously didn't know what a cycle was or what a threshold meant. she went off to ask her supervisor who also didn't know. i agreed to the test without knowing the one thing i wanted to know.
i didn't take the vaccine (and have the job loss to prove it) but i can only imagine what questions the recently hired and hastily trained shot givers couldn't answer about it. there was no "informed" consent. anyone who thinks they made an educated decision is a fool
What struck me immediately after the Government of Canada made a hurried agreement to purchase 140 million doses of an untried and untested 'vaccine' for only 37 million Citizens, was the obvious potential for fraud! However, none of the opposition parties in government seemed to have any problem or concerns with this transaction?
The same scenario played out in other countries around the World.
I do not think that the terms of this agreement are legally binding on Canadian Citizens for several reasons, chiefly that the government acted without legal authority and without any consultation of the citizens. The same would hold true for the current WHO treaty which places the WHO in a position of Dictatorial Authority over the people of Canada? You cannot transform a constitutional Democracy into a Dictatorship by some fiat order at the whim of a bureaucracy!
Past time for a new structure in Canada, and I don't mean Dictatorship!
In case you wonder at my temerity; Sedition is a legal oxymoron in a Democracy!
When the Entire Government behaves like a "Uniparty", there is no point in supporting any of them.