Is anyone besides Clare Craig looking at articles about vaccines? Analysis of those articles would be very handy. Maybe comirnaty and spikevax could be listed at c19hcq.
Your response page 7... The problem with the Dirigible Hindenburg was the Hydrogen inflation, not Helium. The airship would have been safer, but not as efficient.
The Goodyear Blimp and all current lighter than air vehicles use Helium. This is now a limited commodity; in 1936 most of the Helium was obtained from US sources (Texas gas wells) and was not strategically reliable for the Graf Zeppelin or Hindenburg.
Dr. Bridle, your affidavit is one of the most comprehensive top-to-bottom systematic rebuttals of the entire covid public health edifice.
I think that this could be one of the best resources for fighting the influence of the govt/establishment, and it is a tragedy that it has not disseminated into the public eye.
With your permission, I would like to publish most of it as a series of individual sections in separate posts (with some degree of translation interspersed to make it easier for laypeople to read and assimilate the information), in order to bring it to the attention of the people/orgs I work with, and to whatever extent possible into the public.
I reviewed the judge's legalistic reasons for the decision, and the dismissal of the expert opinion from Dr.Juni. It is apparent that the lawyers don't appreciate certain concepts- 1) experimental chemotherapy; 2) Nuremberg Code constraints; 3) Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms" protections.
One of your protections is that you are not bound by CPSO. I have not managed to recruit an ally in BC to issue a complaint, but will continue looking. Registrants have an obligation to "remain current" and provide "informed consent' with competent advice. It would be informative to require Dr. Juni and Dr. Tam to defend their practice in open session.
Very best wishes for a response on Friday, best estimate is that those named will adopt the Justin Trudeau weasel defence- "I felt sick" or "The dog ate my notes."
It is useful to identify the judge, JT Ajkbarali. This is public record, but allows a reasonable assessment of competence, particularly if the case goes to appeal on the basis that your response was not considered, or that the facts found were prejudiced by the judge's failure to understand the basis of your opinion.
For 2 years I have listened to your messages and appreciated and admired your stand for truth. I am a musician, not a science person, but you have helped me to better understand true science. I am indebted to you and pray for you and your colleagues who stand for truth in a dark time.
Read Dr. Jüni's report and you were right, it was complete crap. There is no refutation or even an attempt of a counter-argument on his part, just a contradiction that he disagrees and claims your views are against "international scientific consensus". That's just... nothing.
Reminds me of the engineering reports my boss does when disputing damage, they'll have a detailed analysis and we just disagree... that's our only response, we disagree based on "expertise". There is no expertise, it's not my field of engineering and not his. Vaccines are your field, not Dr. Jüni's.
"Importantly, not a single case that I have been part of to date has been decided based on the weight of the evidence. You should ask why." --this is incredibly disturbing.
I have since day one been speaking out against the vaccine. As far as lockdowns go, if it had been done properly the first time, we wouldn't be in the situation we are currently in. To do a proper lockdown it must be understood that the incubation period of this virus is up to 4 weeks to 3 months. I shared this information we the higher ups at the hospital at which I worked. This information was ignored.
This article came out 9 months after I shared the information.
Clearly Dr. Jüni list the debate simply because he failed to back up what were obviously personal opinions with any data beyond anecdote.
I have heard Dr. Jüni interviewed multiple times on that member organization of the ironically named Trusted News Initiative, knowN as the CBC. Not once have I heard
an interview with any well-credentialed scientist like Dr. Bridle or any one of a number of others who advise caution in the ongoing and clearly failing approach to dealing with Covid19.
Many of us are left feeling that Big Pharma is guiding Canadian health directives.
https://timothywiney.substack.com/p/the-constitutionality-of-the-draft
Excellent, well done Dr Bridle. 👍🏽👏❤️
Y'all took the words right out of my mouth and expressed them far better than I could!
Keep up your fabulous work Dr Bridle!
Is anyone besides Clare Craig looking at articles about vaccines? Analysis of those articles would be very handy. Maybe comirnaty and spikevax could be listed at c19hcq.
e.g., there are several mentioned at https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/no-all-cause-mortality-benefit-in-pfizers-clinical-trial-for-mrna-vaccine-why-6d89b1de0c8d
It's difficult to figure out the shell game.
Your response page 7... The problem with the Dirigible Hindenburg was the Hydrogen inflation, not Helium. The airship would have been safer, but not as efficient.
The Goodyear Blimp and all current lighter than air vehicles use Helium. This is now a limited commodity; in 1936 most of the Helium was obtained from US sources (Texas gas wells) and was not strategically reliable for the Graf Zeppelin or Hindenburg.
Dr. Bridle, your affidavit is one of the most comprehensive top-to-bottom systematic rebuttals of the entire covid public health edifice.
I think that this could be one of the best resources for fighting the influence of the govt/establishment, and it is a tragedy that it has not disseminated into the public eye.
With your permission, I would like to publish most of it as a series of individual sections in separate posts (with some degree of translation interspersed to make it easier for laypeople to read and assimilate the information), in order to bring it to the attention of the people/orgs I work with, and to whatever extent possible into the public.
Thanks so much!!
Sorry for this very late reply. If you haven't already, feel free to use whatever you like from the report.
Thanks so much :)
https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/dr-byram-bridle-on-the-misuse-of?s=w
I learned a new acronym last month-TLDR.
I reviewed the judge's legalistic reasons for the decision, and the dismissal of the expert opinion from Dr.Juni. It is apparent that the lawyers don't appreciate certain concepts- 1) experimental chemotherapy; 2) Nuremberg Code constraints; 3) Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms" protections.
One of your protections is that you are not bound by CPSO. I have not managed to recruit an ally in BC to issue a complaint, but will continue looking. Registrants have an obligation to "remain current" and provide "informed consent' with competent advice. It would be informative to require Dr. Juni and Dr. Tam to defend their practice in open session.
Very best wishes for a response on Friday, best estimate is that those named will adopt the Justin Trudeau weasel defence- "I felt sick" or "The dog ate my notes."
It is useful to identify the judge, JT Ajkbarali. This is public record, but allows a reasonable assessment of competence, particularly if the case goes to appeal on the basis that your response was not considered, or that the facts found were prejudiced by the judge's failure to understand the basis of your opinion.
I like how Dr. Juni just parroted the usual talking points with no science necessary. Same with his rebutt.
For 2 years I have listened to your messages and appreciated and admired your stand for truth. I am a musician, not a science person, but you have helped me to better understand true science. I am indebted to you and pray for you and your colleagues who stand for truth in a dark time.
Read Dr. Jüni's report and you were right, it was complete crap. There is no refutation or even an attempt of a counter-argument on his part, just a contradiction that he disagrees and claims your views are against "international scientific consensus". That's just... nothing.
Reminds me of the engineering reports my boss does when disputing damage, they'll have a detailed analysis and we just disagree... that's our only response, we disagree based on "expertise". There is no expertise, it's not my field of engineering and not his. Vaccines are your field, not Dr. Jüni's.
"Importantly, not a single case that I have been part of to date has been decided based on the weight of the evidence. You should ask why." --this is incredibly disturbing.
I have since day one been speaking out against the vaccine. As far as lockdowns go, if it had been done properly the first time, we wouldn't be in the situation we are currently in. To do a proper lockdown it must be understood that the incubation period of this virus is up to 4 weeks to 3 months. I shared this information we the higher ups at the hospital at which I worked. This information was ignored.
This article came out 9 months after I shared the information.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/11/23/dont-assume-a-14-day-quarantine-is-enough/?sh=dcc4c44721e9
Clearly Dr. Jüni list the debate simply because he failed to back up what were obviously personal opinions with any data beyond anecdote.
I have heard Dr. Jüni interviewed multiple times on that member organization of the ironically named Trusted News Initiative, knowN as the CBC. Not once have I heard
an interview with any well-credentialed scientist like Dr. Bridle or any one of a number of others who advise caution in the ongoing and clearly failing approach to dealing with Covid19.
Many of us are left feeling that Big Pharma is guiding Canadian health directives.
I don't know what to say. Apparently all the science we need today is a well worded sales pitch by the sounds of it.