OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This was one of your best posts!!!! Knowing you are the side of getting the truth out makes me hopeful....you are doing such amazing work...we are all better and blessed because of your efforts and contributions!!! Forever grateful...."Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth." Buddha 🌞🌜🌝
I am both disgusted and horrified by what I have just read in the CTV article by Morgan Lowrie. Thank you Dr. Bridle for being a voice of sanity and common sense in this grotesque societal manipulation that is being orchestrated.
This garbage study and its obviously manipulative intent really pissed me off when I first read it in CMAJ, and even more so when they started pumping it on the airwaves and in MSM. This is exactly the kind of thing you'd expect in China or North Korea...
Unfortunately we are dealing with very stupid MOERONS who believe and do whatever they are told. Facts and logic are of no interest to these dangerous fools.
Hopefully they are all dead or maimed from VAIDS before they can do much damage.
Well I don’t wish the innocent ill health but do wish Justice on those pushing the lie - thank Dr Bridal for honesty, integrity and expertise - may you be blessed for truth ❤️🙏
Apr 27, 2022·edited Apr 27, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
Hi Dr. Bridle,
A local physician has a FB group where he often shares Fisman’s material including tweets regarding lockdowns and other news articles. This past weekend he reminded everyone in the group to get vaccinated. I replied, “Thank you for the reminder. Assuming that 99.9% of the people in this group are vaccinated, and that we will all come in contact with the virus, is there anything we can do to improve our immune health for when the inevitable happens?”
He replied, “There is nothing we can do that’s been scientifically proven to assist our immune health nor is it quantifiable.”
I have asked him frequently to debate his assertions regarding the safety of these products for children as he himself is also frequently in the media promoting them. He has declined, and said that, “medical science is not settled via debate”.
Agree with everything you stated. And I get the sense that they want to achieve exactly what you are stating: "This kind of messaging will only fuel hatred and segregation and the potential development of harmful policies." Validating hatred and segregation and the development of harmful policies has been the goal from the beginning. To achieve it they needed to lure the majority into taking the vaccines, first. Which they did. The majority will not read the article just the title. And that title will be used to validate their views about vax being "safe and effective" and unvaxxed being the "enemy". in the words of Chris MacIntosh:" Human beings — regardless of race, religion or culture — like to embrace any belief that is absolute. This is because absolute beliefs are simple, easy to comprehend, and false positives that offer us a false sense of security. If we come to believe that a particular idea, place, or group of people are either all good or all bad, then we humans fool ourselves into thinking that we have got a piece of a particular equation all figured out. Such a binary viewpoint is psychologically comforting, allowing us to feel assured and in control. The more control we feel the more assured we feel so there is a feedback loop here which can and does take hold. "
Agree on one level, but I've always thought that once they've reached critical mass with the clot shot, they call all clear to let your guard down, and then finish the job of spotein immune system destruction via close contact and vax shedding. When It shows up in the unvaxed as virulent cancers and prion type diseases, they'll never know what hit em or who to set the torches and pitchforks on. Diabolical. There's no way these psychos had a one-prong approach.
Vaccine shedding was admitted to in a latest Pfizer paper release. Merogenomics YouTube discussed Cannabinoids blocking the spike protein from entering the nucleus of the cells. Anti inflammatories, antivirals , (found in food, herbs, spice, essential oils and Nasal hygiene - salt wash, (I have always used eucalyptus spray for flu season and this). Organic. Essential minerals, vit D etc. sunlight. Maintain innate immunity.
Never Say Die (Cartoon of a frog, with it’s hands, strangling a stork’s neck as the stork attempts to swallow the frog head first).
That is a superb article, Dr. Bridle. It covers ALL the bases, by scientifically discrediting the work, pointing out the harmful effects of its dissemination, and calling to task the many parties involved. Thank you for taking the time to see that such a misguided (and obviously malicious) effort is thwarted -- using real data instead of conjured numbers.
Yes, and articulated in terms that a layperson, like myself, can understand and then have in my rhetorical arsenal when given the chance to explain the facts to others. Great article, Dr. Bridle.
I have chills. My mouth is open. You are a hero, Byram. The world owes you a debt it cannot possibly understand that it does. Even those of us who support you here have only a fractional understanding of the costs, courage, and draw on your personal resources this undertaking takes. You are loved and appreciated.
Apr 27, 2022·edited Apr 27, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
Model-based policy has been going on throughout. The lockdown in the UK was based on a model by Prof Lockdown himself Neil Ferguson, Imperial College. Some years before, he had "modelled" projections for foot and mouth disease in cattle in the UK resulting in a cull of millions of cattle. As it turned out, there were no more than a handful of cases, all of which were controlled.
That was the first Covid model and was widely debunked at a later date. But the US and Canada followed suit. Ontario lockdowns have been based on following modelling by the so-called Science Table - none of those models have proven to be even partways close to accurate. See Prof Bridle's article for a mention about those models.
Not to mention not a single person on the science table is a doctor or any medical knowledge what so ever - it is disgusting that none of the top actual specialists were placed on the science table - that alone is proof of their criminality in all of this 😢
Something else that I found interesting was that Dr Shabass (spelling??) the former chief medical officer of Ontario, disagreed strongly with the Ford government public health people, lockdowns etc, but was completely ignored.
I was starting to feel hopeful like yourself that “they” were figuring it out albeit slowly. Now I see the article has made its way to Forbes so clearly it is feeding an agenda. But we must hope that truth will out.
Maybe the vaccinated will be boosted into such a state of somnambulism that they won’t be able to rise from the couch in their selfappointed muzzle-prison, that you’ll be able to talk sense to the “risen”......
Apr 27, 2022·edited Apr 27, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
If these vaccines do not protect the vaccinated what is the point of getting vaccinated? Especially considering the number of vaccine injuries in the short term and that the long term safety of the vaccines is entirely unknown.
Exactly. The premise of the entire study is that the "vaccines" neither protect the "vaccinated" from transmission nor infection. From the results "The contact-adjusted contribution of unvaccinated people to infection risk was disproportionate, with unvaccinated people contributing to infections among those who were vaccinated at a rate higher than would have been expected based on contact numbers alone." Isn't this a tacit admission that the jabs are really and truly of little or no benefit?
I'm not vaxxed but I think I caught omicron (from a 3x vaxxed person - she was the only symptomatic person I was around at the right time). For me, it was a very, very mild cold: I've been taking vitamin D and zinc among other supplements. For colds & flu's, I've always used Cold FX, elderberry syrup and oil of oregano and did the same for this. For the record, I quarantined for 10 days, my vaxxed friend obviously did not. I also know lots of people who've had omicron both vaxxed and unvaxxed, all mild cases.
Two years of getting away with brazen lying has resulted in David Fisman being lazy and more arrogant than ever. Thus Fisman and his colleague have blown it. This latest con is too obvious. The College and others who may try to prop it up will sink into Fisman's fraud like quicksand. It just requires calling it out, as you've done, Dr. Bridle, and demanding accountability! Thank you!
Thank you for digging deeper into the model to expose what common sense is telling you doesn't look right. Very sad that this made it in, but I have already known that much of what is published in peer-reviewed journals ranges from meaningless to nothing new to pure garbage. It takes critical thinking, expertise, and sometimes extra investigation to find the true gold nuggets. So much pressure to publish x number of times is what fuels this problem with infojunk. When work gets published, it means words, numbers, and figures are printed on a page. After that, you're on your own because some people have hypotheses that they want prove no matter what number they decide to tweak.
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This was one of your best posts!!!! Knowing you are the side of getting the truth out makes me hopeful....you are doing such amazing work...we are all better and blessed because of your efforts and contributions!!! Forever grateful...."Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth." Buddha 🌞🌜🌝
I am both disgusted and horrified by what I have just read in the CTV article by Morgan Lowrie. Thank you Dr. Bridle for being a voice of sanity and common sense in this grotesque societal manipulation that is being orchestrated.
Does anyone have the CMAJ names and details on where to write these letters?
This garbage study and its obviously manipulative intent really pissed me off when I first read it in CMAJ, and even more so when they started pumping it on the airwaves and in MSM. This is exactly the kind of thing you'd expect in China or North Korea...
Unfortunately we are dealing with very stupid MOERONS who believe and do whatever they are told. Facts and logic are of no interest to these dangerous fools.
Hopefully they are all dead or maimed from VAIDS before they can do much damage.
Well I don’t wish the innocent ill health but do wish Justice on those pushing the lie - thank Dr Bridal for honesty, integrity and expertise - may you be blessed for truth ❤️🙏
I think they know what they are doing, it is too far gone to be anything but lies serving to promote an agenda, an evil agenda at that.
Fisman et al. Is worse than disinformation…it is a species of hate speech. Call it what it is.
Covid criminal!
Hi Dr. Bridle,
A local physician has a FB group where he often shares Fisman’s material including tweets regarding lockdowns and other news articles. This past weekend he reminded everyone in the group to get vaccinated. I replied, “Thank you for the reminder. Assuming that 99.9% of the people in this group are vaccinated, and that we will all come in contact with the virus, is there anything we can do to improve our immune health for when the inevitable happens?”
He replied, “There is nothing we can do that’s been scientifically proven to assist our immune health nor is it quantifiable.”
I have asked him frequently to debate his assertions regarding the safety of these products for children as he himself is also frequently in the media promoting them. He has declined, and said that, “medical science is not settled via debate”.
Scary times!
Thanks for producing this so quickly.
Regards,
Greg
Well that is one doctor you never want to go too 👍
Agree.
Agree with everything you stated. And I get the sense that they want to achieve exactly what you are stating: "This kind of messaging will only fuel hatred and segregation and the potential development of harmful policies." Validating hatred and segregation and the development of harmful policies has been the goal from the beginning. To achieve it they needed to lure the majority into taking the vaccines, first. Which they did. The majority will not read the article just the title. And that title will be used to validate their views about vax being "safe and effective" and unvaxxed being the "enemy". in the words of Chris MacIntosh:" Human beings — regardless of race, religion or culture — like to embrace any belief that is absolute. This is because absolute beliefs are simple, easy to comprehend, and false positives that offer us a false sense of security. If we come to believe that a particular idea, place, or group of people are either all good or all bad, then we humans fool ourselves into thinking that we have got a piece of a particular equation all figured out. Such a binary viewpoint is psychologically comforting, allowing us to feel assured and in control. The more control we feel the more assured we feel so there is a feedback loop here which can and does take hold. "
Agree on one level, but I've always thought that once they've reached critical mass with the clot shot, they call all clear to let your guard down, and then finish the job of spotein immune system destruction via close contact and vax shedding. When It shows up in the unvaxed as virulent cancers and prion type diseases, they'll never know what hit em or who to set the torches and pitchforks on. Diabolical. There's no way these psychos had a one-prong approach.
Vaccine shedding was admitted to in a latest Pfizer paper release. Merogenomics YouTube discussed Cannabinoids blocking the spike protein from entering the nucleus of the cells. Anti inflammatories, antivirals , (found in food, herbs, spice, essential oils and Nasal hygiene - salt wash, (I have always used eucalyptus spray for flu season and this). Organic. Essential minerals, vit D etc. sunlight. Maintain innate immunity.
Never Say Die (Cartoon of a frog, with it’s hands, strangling a stork’s neck as the stork attempts to swallow the frog head first).
Did you mean A stork perhaps? 😅😅
Agree
That is a superb article, Dr. Bridle. It covers ALL the bases, by scientifically discrediting the work, pointing out the harmful effects of its dissemination, and calling to task the many parties involved. Thank you for taking the time to see that such a misguided (and obviously malicious) effort is thwarted -- using real data instead of conjured numbers.
I'm very grateful for your effort.
Yes, and articulated in terms that a layperson, like myself, can understand and then have in my rhetorical arsenal when given the chance to explain the facts to others. Great article, Dr. Bridle.
I have chills. My mouth is open. You are a hero, Byram. The world owes you a debt it cannot possibly understand that it does. Even those of us who support you here have only a fractional understanding of the costs, courage, and draw on your personal resources this undertaking takes. You are loved and appreciated.
Hands down the best article written about the ‘vaccination’ issue. Thank you Dr. Bridle. Bookmarking and tweeting
I am absolutely astonished at what's going on in Canada. We're basing policy on MODELS. What in the...?
Model-based policy has been going on throughout. The lockdown in the UK was based on a model by Prof Lockdown himself Neil Ferguson, Imperial College. Some years before, he had "modelled" projections for foot and mouth disease in cattle in the UK resulting in a cull of millions of cattle. As it turned out, there were no more than a handful of cases, all of which were controlled.
That was the first Covid model and was widely debunked at a later date. But the US and Canada followed suit. Ontario lockdowns have been based on following modelling by the so-called Science Table - none of those models have proven to be even partways close to accurate. See Prof Bridle's article for a mention about those models.
Not to mention not a single person on the science table is a doctor or any medical knowledge what so ever - it is disgusting that none of the top actual specialists were placed on the science table - that alone is proof of their criminality in all of this 😢
Something else that I found interesting was that Dr Shabass (spelling??) the former chief medical officer of Ontario, disagreed strongly with the Ford government public health people, lockdowns etc, but was completely ignored.
This study (if you can even call it that) dropped my mood considerably.
From yesterdays thoughts "they're figuring it out slowly"
To todays "they're trying to tear society apart I had better get myself ready for the witch hunt"
Thanks for calling it out.
I was starting to feel hopeful like yourself that “they” were figuring it out albeit slowly. Now I see the article has made its way to Forbes so clearly it is feeding an agenda. But we must hope that truth will out.
Maybe the vaccinated will be boosted into such a state of somnambulism that they won’t be able to rise from the couch in their selfappointed muzzle-prison, that you’ll be able to talk sense to the “risen”......
If these vaccines do not protect the vaccinated what is the point of getting vaccinated? Especially considering the number of vaccine injuries in the short term and that the long term safety of the vaccines is entirely unknown.
Oh but they "prevent severe illness and death". Didn't you hear that? "If I hadn't been vaccinated and had the booster I'd be dead by now".
I'm still trying to figure out how anyone would know that. How would it be measured?
It's like saying " I had sex and wore a condom, and now she's pregnant. But it would have been twins otherwise."
Good one.
I know the vaccine is working. To boost the mega profits of the vaccine industry.
Exactly. The premise of the entire study is that the "vaccines" neither protect the "vaccinated" from transmission nor infection. From the results "The contact-adjusted contribution of unvaccinated people to infection risk was disproportionate, with unvaccinated people contributing to infections among those who were vaccinated at a rate higher than would have been expected based on contact numbers alone." Isn't this a tacit admission that the jabs are really and truly of little or no benefit?
First off, what was the source of the infection that infected the vaccinated? How do we know it was an unvaccinated person?
Did the person have any symptoms?
Secondly this seems to prove that the vaccine actually weakens the immune system of the vaccinated if they catch it so easily.
Anecdotal evidence - I know 4 people all vaxxed and all got Covid. I know twenty or so unvaxxed. None of them have had it.
I'm not vaxxed but I think I caught omicron (from a 3x vaxxed person - she was the only symptomatic person I was around at the right time). For me, it was a very, very mild cold: I've been taking vitamin D and zinc among other supplements. For colds & flu's, I've always used Cold FX, elderberry syrup and oil of oregano and did the same for this. For the record, I quarantined for 10 days, my vaxxed friend obviously did not. I also know lots of people who've had omicron both vaxxed and unvaxxed, all mild cases.
Let’s start and end this “discussion” with the some basic facts:
1. the Covid tests are unreliable.
2. the data is therefore bullshit.
3. No one with a financial or political stake in the issue of vaccine efficacy is trustworthy.
Two years of getting away with brazen lying has resulted in David Fisman being lazy and more arrogant than ever. Thus Fisman and his colleague have blown it. This latest con is too obvious. The College and others who may try to prop it up will sink into Fisman's fraud like quicksand. It just requires calling it out, as you've done, Dr. Bridle, and demanding accountability! Thank you!
Thank you once again Dr Bridle for an excellent and necessary article. I hope it finds its way to a majority of Canadians.
It’s so obviously flawed and manipulative. The timing clearly serves a purpose. I’m not sure exactly what they have in mind.
- increasing deaths of vaccinated Canadians?
https://sheldonyakiwchuk.substack.com/p/81-of-covid-deaths-from-the-last?r=uickb&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=direct
- or the upcoming rally in Ottawa
- new measures
Again, thank you for your work!
New measures - I'd take a bet Trudeau will be looking for a third shot to travel; and maybe worse.
Exceptional analysis. How is it possible that this sort of implausible “science” gets published?!
Because as we know most of the “ leaders” are lazy , inculcated or corrupt
Thank you for digging deeper into the model to expose what common sense is telling you doesn't look right. Very sad that this made it in, but I have already known that much of what is published in peer-reviewed journals ranges from meaningless to nothing new to pure garbage. It takes critical thinking, expertise, and sometimes extra investigation to find the true gold nuggets. So much pressure to publish x number of times is what fuels this problem with infojunk. When work gets published, it means words, numbers, and figures are printed on a page. After that, you're on your own because some people have hypotheses that they want prove no matter what number they decide to tweak.