Health Canada Hid Their Concerns About Impurities In COVID-19 Shots From Canadians

The Epoch Times, a media outlet that is not state-funded, released an article yesterday that was updated today. Everyone around the world should read it. You can find it here. The journalist, Noé Chartier, did an excellent job writing a well-balanced, objective, and factual account. I do not have much to add.

For those who might not be able to access the article, here is a summary:

It has been shown that the modified RNA COVID-10 shots are contaminated with bacterial DNA, which, in and of itself, is a serious concern. A more recent finding highlighted additional contaminants that nobody had predicted. The modified RNAs can get mis-read during the process of cells translating them into the intended spike protein from SARS-CoV-2. The result is that up to 8% of the proteins that an injected person’s cells make from the modRNAs are unintended, novel foreign proteins that are nothing like the target spike protein.

Laughably, the authors who first highlighted this finding chose the title, “mRNA vaccines may make unintended proteins, but there’s no evidence of harm: Alterations that help messenger RNA persist in living cells can trip up protein synthesis“.

The “no evidence of harm” component is a standard prerequisite these days to get any concern about modRNA shots published. As per the precautionary principle that was thrown out four years ago, the title should actually state, “mRNA vaccines may make unintended proteins, and there’s no evidence that these are safe“. The worn-out adage that ‘the shots have been given to millions around the world and have ‘proven’ to be ‘safe and effective’ can no longer be used as ‘evidence of safety’. Why? Because failure to look sufficiently hard for evidence of harms, and downplaying harms that could not be hidden is NOT evidence of safety. When you read the article by The Epoch Times, you will see that Health Canada still clings strongly to this misguided philosophical approach to safety.

The part about “Alterations that help messenger RNA persist in living cells can trip up protein synthesis“ indicates that this unintended and potentially dangerous side-effect is the result of the alterations to natural mRNAs that was recently awarded the Nobel Prize. After all, a Nobel Prize should obviously be awarded for a technology for which unintended side-effects are still being discovered via its premature public rollout around the globe [read with lots of sarcasm].

Health Canada developed concerns about these unintended proteins after learning the real science from my respected colleague, Dr. Jessica Rose, via her Substack article. This article should also be read by everyone since it beautifully describes why these unpredicted contaminating proteins are of legitimate concern.

In short, a scientist at Health Canada that was tasked with investigating this issue agreed that these unintended proteins represent a “high level of impurity”. Internal emails from Health Canada were obtained by The Epoch Times via a freedom of information request. The communications clearly demonstrate concern within Health Canada about how these recently discovered contaminants (that have been a problem from day one) could negate the authorization of the shots. The result was that Health Canada worked hard to find internal ‘fact checkers’ willing to downplay the internal concerns. So, the final summary of the investigation hid the most concerning aspects.

Keep in mind that the contaminating off-target proteins are only one in a long and still-growing list of concerns with the modRNA COVID-19 shots. We continue to learn much about the basic mechanisms of action of the technology via the global-scale experiment. So, I call, for the umpteenth time, for a world-wide moratorium on this technology so the research can catch up. Places like the state of Florida in the United States are looking more and more like wise world leaders after having already halted the use of these shots.

For all those people who still claim that the Dr. Jessica Rose’s and the rest of the experts that have stood against the tidal wave of the COVID-19 narrative are mere misinformation spreaders, hear this: you no longer need to believe the solid science we have been presenting. Instead, you can look at the burgeoning evidence that your health regulators have been lying to you or hiding important truths from you.

And to top it off, Health Canada keeps trying to take themselves off the hook by dumping full responsibility for assessment and reporting of safety on the big pharma companies. Yes, the same companies that have a keen interest in pushing their products that are profitable to the tune of billions of dollars.

What do the narrative pushers think about health regulatory agencies that not only lie, not only hide concerns, but then obfuscate their responsibility to ensure the safety of citizens by allowing companies that have historical criminal records to ‘ensure the safety’ of their own products?

I have said this before many times and will say it again… Health regulatory agencies around the world need to be gutted and replaced with people that have three characteristics that too many among the current lot lack:

1. Genuine and relevant subject matter expertise

2. Integrity

3. Courage

Then there needs to be a restored reliance of health regulatory agencies on the financial support of taxpayers rather than big pharma.

Only then will public safety be restored as the demonstrable primary mandate of health regulators. And only then can the explosion of distrust in these agencies be stemmed.

I for one would be more than happy to offer my expertise as a viral immunologist that specializes in vaccinology to assist any government (federal or provincial/state) that is genuinely interested in properly regulating big pharma. Specifically, I would be happy to objectively review their applications, make recommendations for required studies, highlight any concerns, and transparently disseminate the findings to the public. Of course, this would need to be done in the context of a job that is protected from negative coercive influences and threats should objective science ever fail to support political or economic narratives.

---