So glad you opened up a Substack. You have a unique, independent, and indispensable voice and I’m delighted to support your work via paid subscription.
Every day brings a new and profoundly distressing revelation from these Pfizer docs. All I can say is I am thankful we have heroic scientists, physicians, and data analysts of integrity like you, Dr. Jessica Rose, Dr. Naomi Wolf, and too many others to name harnessing the full strength of your analytical powers and knowledge to assess the data we have obtained thus far.
If autoimmune hepatitis is a potential outcome for the injected, does that mean the spate of hepatitis cases appearing in non-jabbed children could be a byproduct of shedding?
Not shedding, I think. There are several indices that the great majority of the children affected are of very young age. Among other things, the fact that so few (almost none?) appear to have been vaccinated. So, this suggests that they are mostly under 5 and there is in any case no approved vaccine for their age group. If it turns out that the unvaccinated ones are all babies or toddlers, then the likeliest hypothesis is not shedding, but that they were breastfed and were exposed via mother's milk.
In Canada these inoculations are approved and encouraged for all those 6 months and older. I don't know what the current uptake of the inoculation for the young ones are.
Those who still believe the narrative need to be forgiven. These people cannot fathom the profundity of corruption and institutional capture that could lead to the cascading failure of ethical and moral governance and oversight. For those of us who have been attune and aware of this corrosive corruption, incrementally augmented day after day and degree by degree, we have accepted the reality of the miasmatic regime. It is awful to witness. But we must look at it. And the miasmatic state wants you demoralized. It needs you to become demoralized. Don’t let it. Our joy, happiness, and knowledge of their unethical subterfuge are an answer and an antidote. Smile. It will only get worse, and the more we smile, the more they are unmasked.
"Why were non-proprietary data redacted? This caused alarming data to be hidden from the public." - I think you provided the logical answer to your question. If the public was aware of the actual risks associated with these products most would not have taken them. Most in the pharma industry were well aware of what they were up to: https://twitter.com/aginnt/status/1499567294770565121/
Thank you for your continuing efforts to educate the public. Sadly, what we are up against is in a large part due to willful ignorance on the part of the general public. This is a great analysis of the dynamics in play in Canada today:
There have been so many contradictions and backtracking on the issues that anyone still believing the lies Trudeau, Singh, and the other 200 idiot MP's are saying must have their heads, ahem, buried deep in the sand.
May 31, 2022·edited May 31, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
Thank you Dr Bridle for the comparison. By now there’s plenty of proof, crimes have been committed! I hope the day is coming soon, that the world will know your name.
"‘If the American People ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the street and lynch us’ - H.W. Bush June 1992 to Sarah McClendon (White House Press Corps)"
We've finally found out who they are and what they've done!!!
How the HELL did they expect to get away with this? We’re not going to let them get away with it.
Global Predators, we’re coming for you, we have the stamina to hound you down, and we damn well will!!!
Never O.K. To redact scientific observations that can provide baselines for further scientific observations, adjustments, improvements. Organ involvement, autoimmune responses are hurting people.
The lack of headshots in the pictures is disturbing because didn't the manufacturer know that the LNP's cross the blood-brain barrier? So this seems to be another potential example of data cover up.
Interesting that you brought that up. This was my instant thought as well.
My son in law has suffered headaches since his jabs and refuses to believe they are from the shots. Well, he has had brain MRI which shows concerning views. He has also been Dx with some sort of optic nerve damage.
I think I recall seeing head shots when the biodistribution data from Pfizer was first out. A neuroscientist showed the pics. And though it was easy to see in the ovaries and adrenals, there were mildly lit up places in the brain that the skull bones obscured somewhat. I can’t remember the scientist’s name who posted those original pics from the FOIA request by Japanese researchers. Needless to say, the evidence from the huge numbers of neurological injuries we are seeing with these biologic injectables in human subjects, speaks volumes…
Is there a level of redaction which is effectively constructive contempt of court? If allowed to get away with it any organisation will push the boundaries until all they will be releasing are blank sheets of paper. This would be a mockery of scrutiny and legal process.
May 31, 2022·edited May 31, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
What does a naughty child do when you catch him with his hands in the cookie jar?
First he drops everything and puts his hands behind his back to hide them. Then he makes any excuse to justify why he had the jar in his possession the first place. "I was just looking daddy"
This is instinctive and immature behavior which could be recognized by anyone whether they're a parent or not.
These bastards however are highly paid pharmaceutical executives with almost as highly paid PR teams and lawyers. You have to laugh at what money buys these days. Apparently its just a more expensive version of the same goofy blank stare a 4 year old would give.
Mice are not humans. The study can show a pattern but we could distribute the material quite differently too due to our biological differences.
Luciferase is not spike protein, how do we know spike protein is not produced in far higher quantities and for longer durations?
Put two and two together. This is not good. It does not look good. Doesn't sound good. It looks and sounds like corruption. If it waddles like a duck and it quacks...
May 31, 2022·edited May 31, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
I would further add that data from animal research/testing can never be reliably extrapolated to humans and it is used not for sound scientific purposes but for legal protection down the road, if needed.
So glad you opened up a Substack. You have a unique, independent, and indispensable voice and I’m delighted to support your work via paid subscription.
Every day brings a new and profoundly distressing revelation from these Pfizer docs. All I can say is I am thankful we have heroic scientists, physicians, and data analysts of integrity like you, Dr. Jessica Rose, Dr. Naomi Wolf, and too many others to name harnessing the full strength of your analytical powers and knowledge to assess the data we have obtained thus far.
If autoimmune hepatitis is a potential outcome for the injected, does that mean the spate of hepatitis cases appearing in non-jabbed children could be a byproduct of shedding?
Not shedding, I think. There are several indices that the great majority of the children affected are of very young age. Among other things, the fact that so few (almost none?) appear to have been vaccinated. So, this suggests that they are mostly under 5 and there is in any case no approved vaccine for their age group. If it turns out that the unvaccinated ones are all babies or toddlers, then the likeliest hypothesis is not shedding, but that they were breastfed and were exposed via mother's milk.
In Canada these inoculations are approved and encouraged for all those 6 months and older. I don't know what the current uptake of the inoculation for the young ones are.
Agree with everything you said. Great comment. Thank you Dr. Bridle
I have been wondering the same thing.
Very good question MAA ✅
Those who still believe the narrative need to be forgiven. These people cannot fathom the profundity of corruption and institutional capture that could lead to the cascading failure of ethical and moral governance and oversight. For those of us who have been attune and aware of this corrosive corruption, incrementally augmented day after day and degree by degree, we have accepted the reality of the miasmatic regime. It is awful to witness. But we must look at it. And the miasmatic state wants you demoralized. It needs you to become demoralized. Don’t let it. Our joy, happiness, and knowledge of their unethical subterfuge are an answer and an antidote. Smile. It will only get worse, and the more we smile, the more they are unmasked.
Our success and exposure scares them shitless 😎👍
Great comment. 👍🏼😊
"Why were non-proprietary data redacted? This caused alarming data to be hidden from the public." - I think you provided the logical answer to your question. If the public was aware of the actual risks associated with these products most would not have taken them. Most in the pharma industry were well aware of what they were up to: https://twitter.com/aginnt/status/1499567294770565121/
Thank you for your continuing efforts to educate the public. Sadly, what we are up against is in a large part due to willful ignorance on the part of the general public. This is a great analysis of the dynamics in play in Canada today:
https://filiperafaeli.substack.com/p/the-day-i-understood-the-good-german?s=r
There have been so many contradictions and backtracking on the issues that anyone still believing the lies Trudeau, Singh, and the other 200 idiot MP's are saying must have their heads, ahem, buried deep in the sand.
Willful ignorance is exactly one of the biggest problems with society. Well said
The judge who ordered the data dump needs to see this.
Thank you Dr Bridle for the comparison. By now there’s plenty of proof, crimes have been committed! I hope the day is coming soon, that the world will know your name.
Time to lock them all UP.
.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fefa293e4-4420-457b-a5f8-c203fd055fa9_714x947.jpeg
.
Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of
Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of
American Citizens
Count 2: 18 USC § 2339– Conspiring to
Commit Acts of Terrorism
Count 3. 15 U.S.C. §1-3 – conspiring to
criminal commercial activity
Count 4. 18 USC § 175 – Funding and Creating
a Biological Weapon
Count 5. 15 U.S.C. §8 – market manipulation
and allocation
Count 6. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 – lying to Congress
Count 7. 15 U.S.C. § 19 – interlocking
directorates
Count 8. 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious
conspiracy
.
Jim Jones
https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/61910a2d98732d54b73ef8fc/1651431428415-KHKVSHSPP9TNW62C05WD/Screen+Shot+2022-05-01+at+2.55.32+PM.png?format=750w
Nostradamus, jail?
Alligators, starving hogs
These aren't criminals. Far worse
Sabateurs in time of UNDECLARED WAR ON CIVILIANS... they get a brief time to explain themselves, then leader of good guys calls for summary execution.
Geneva Convention doesn't give them a lot of rights!
"‘If the American People ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the street and lynch us’ - H.W. Bush June 1992 to Sarah McClendon (White House Press Corps)"
We've finally found out who they are and what they've done!!!
How the HELL did they expect to get away with this? We’re not going to let them get away with it.
Global Predators, we’re coming for you, we have the stamina to hound you down, and we damn well will!!!
Dude, people are so pissed Substack has a more high brow crowd.
Go to bitchute.com once in awhile... visceral
WHO interview. Real freaken journalist
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QVord9uH3NUY/
That's Rebels News' style. Those are the only guys you can call journalists in Canadastan these days and this guy is from Australia.
Google review on WEF... I try
https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/@30.321416,-97.7018625,2z/data=!4m5!14m4!1m3!1m2!1s105113304647241861511!2s0x89c258fbaee23871:0xa5beb7c22cd0125e?hl=
Google's fake fact checkers may not have read the review yet - or they didn't understand it.
The devil made them do it?
Luciferase? Lucifer? What?
Never O.K. To redact scientific observations that can provide baselines for further scientific observations, adjustments, improvements. Organ involvement, autoimmune responses are hurting people.
Excellent work Mr. Bridle. It is front line crusaders like you who will bring the truth to light.
The lack of headshots in the pictures is disturbing because didn't the manufacturer know that the LNP's cross the blood-brain barrier? So this seems to be another potential example of data cover up.
Heck yeah.
Interesting that you brought that up. This was my instant thought as well.
My son in law has suffered headaches since his jabs and refuses to believe they are from the shots. Well, he has had brain MRI which shows concerning views. He has also been Dx with some sort of optic nerve damage.
Read esp. comments by Jim Caldwell. https://darbyshaw.substack.com/p/eye-injuries-alone-should-have-halted?s=r
thank you for this link.
I think I recall seeing head shots when the biodistribution data from Pfizer was first out. A neuroscientist showed the pics. And though it was easy to see in the ovaries and adrenals, there were mildly lit up places in the brain that the skull bones obscured somewhat. I can’t remember the scientist’s name who posted those original pics from the FOIA request by Japanese researchers. Needless to say, the evidence from the huge numbers of neurological injuries we are seeing with these biologic injectables in human subjects, speaks volumes…
Is there a level of redaction which is effectively constructive contempt of court? If allowed to get away with it any organisation will push the boundaries until all they will be releasing are blank sheets of paper. This would be a mockery of scrutiny and legal process.
What does a naughty child do when you catch him with his hands in the cookie jar?
First he drops everything and puts his hands behind his back to hide them. Then he makes any excuse to justify why he had the jar in his possession the first place. "I was just looking daddy"
This is instinctive and immature behavior which could be recognized by anyone whether they're a parent or not.
These bastards however are highly paid pharmaceutical executives with almost as highly paid PR teams and lawyers. You have to laugh at what money buys these days. Apparently its just a more expensive version of the same goofy blank stare a 4 year old would give.
Mice are not humans. The study can show a pattern but we could distribute the material quite differently too due to our biological differences.
Luciferase is not spike protein, how do we know spike protein is not produced in far higher quantities and for longer durations?
Put two and two together. This is not good. It does not look good. Doesn't sound good. It looks and sounds like corruption. If it waddles like a duck and it quacks...
And the court probably knows this, but is not holding Pfizer in contempt?
Exceptionally gifted writer and Dr; Excellent articles, ty
Thank you
I would further add that data from animal research/testing can never be reliably extrapolated to humans and it is used not for sound scientific purposes but for legal protection down the road, if needed.