Great write up. I would share this with friends and family but they would explode because their intelligence would be questioned, and "this is just written from a guy I never heard of"
We are living is very sad times. Thank you again for sharing this. It is good information for ME to share with friends that understand and like discussion
I have people like that too, ..... But I always send it anyway !!
Some say I have a combative personality. I don't though, I just don't concern myself with how the Truth is taken by others. Yes, I get called Asshole an awful lot, but that's okay, I know what that means too. lol
One of my favorite slogans of the past 45 years has been "If the truth hurts, .... Change your truths". Some get it, others can't figure out what it means. What can ya do ??
I can not do that, I get scolded and shunned. I am already "not part of my younger daughters family" because I suggested 18 months ago that they should not vaxx their kids. Whoa, the roof blew off
Lol! Many of us are "in the same boat"! I have just ONE relative left whom I communicate with! It's okay. You cannot compromise the truth just because they are oblivious.
I probably get off easy because all my family and friends know how I am already. Translation: The benefits of being That Asshole for many decades. lol
I had a phone conversation back in early 2021 with my next to youngest daughter who is turning thirty soon, about the vaccine. I told her she should not take it and working as a nurse just ensured we were going to have a rough talk. lol In the end she hung up on me and I didn't hear from her for almost a year. In the meantime I started sending her emails every day with covid info and vaxx info and adverse event info, it was awesome. Then one day she actually replied to one of me emails with "Is this really important right now when there are more important things like Roe getting overturned ?? What a way to segue without admitting defeat, ... okay, lets play. The emails went back and forth at a brisk pace and then she stopped responding. go figure. After, I simply added abortion info the the usual covid and vaxx info that I was already emailing her daily. Lets see her try that one again. lol
When it comes to being shunned or ignored, I generally see it as a blessing. I'm not anti-social, I just feel a lot more comfortable with fewer people around. It's better for me, and being a cranky old goat, it's likely better for them also. lol
Well, why bother? Because I did a shit ton of research on covid, masks and these so-called vaccines and I felt that it might turn out to be very critical if I did not say anything. So I did tell everyone I could, to be very wary and think twice, ..... then told them all the reasons why. If I didn't warn the people I care about, I wouldn't be able to live with myself if it turned out badly for them afterwards.
Lots of my family at this stage are....... 'we know, but we really don't want to know any more' , they listen but kind of aghast, so I just go easy on it now, some of them appear worried, maybe sheepish, about partaking. It's sad to look at, because I think they are right to be worried, and removing any empathy, fleetingly, they do look stupid from this perspective.
Reckon there's a large cohort of people that now know it didn't work ( majority must have hoped yeah ..Or why take it ?), and nuances aside, think is was reasonable to give it a shot, or that it was unlucky, in other words still hopelessly propagandised by pivots in the narrative.
2 years on it's still a marvel to witness it, fear clearly is a huge factor, but then maybe that's the condition which is always just under the surface, easy to exploit, who of us doesn't deal with it, oh wait....the psychos cope pretty well !
I quit talking to my sister about these shots - except to tell her she needn’t take any more since she has natural immunity (that was a little over a year ago). Hope she listened, I don’t want to know at this point.
we can all hope but .... it does make you wonder if they are really people you need in your life.
I used to tell my sister "You do not need to be best friends with all of your neighbors" long ago when she was disappointed that she could not attain that (hahaha) but the same applies to family.
Honestly, my siblings and I are going through daddy's (he died in June at age 99.5) paperwork, sorting out the long arduous trust accounts and doing the final taxes etc etc. Maybe if we are fortunate to complete this entire thing next year, I really do not have much interest in keeping relationships tight and loving with two nitwits, one a raging liberal and the other an angry raging liberal. They are not pleasant to be around.
So, it does help you to learn and realize what is important.
We’re still familial, I just don’t want the added worry of wondering if she’s taken any more poison. She had a bout of cancer and recurrence of shingles and I’ll always wonder if those were due to the poison shots.
I wonder what they decide you would feel and think if they would try to give you their perspective?
I never cease to be amazed at the strange and exotic person I've become in the minds of family members who have always preferred to define me by their own pre-judgments/prejudices, rather than any actual interchange , communication, or presence.
Now I see how we can be "in two ( or more) places at once!! While I'm being me here , doing what I do and saying what I say, there's another me saying and thinking and feeling and doing what they imagine; and for sure they "speak for me/as me". They know all the ways that I am wrong because those are all the ways they see things differently. They actually never ask how I see things. They already know everything about me, and somehow, I never in any way veer or change from their image of me. A strange inversion: Their image of me is solid and has substance; my actual beingness is illusionary and insubstantial.
Wow!!
Thanks. That's an outrageous and comprehensively linked understanding you've opened the door to.
What I meant to say...perhaps not well as "dawn broke over marblehead".....is that in their construction of who they need me to be for their purposes....my true self is "a ghost"...insubstantial, has no substance in fact in their judgments; and the illusory me they create is the only one that they can attribute with any real substance.
Have I got this ...going on right? In thinking? It's not the end of it, I'm sure. Just begun
they don't want to....I was the A+ one; now, they have money and I don't so I'm dumb as a doorknob.
I didn't have to do anything at all. Passion, Aggression, and Ignorance. Ignorance is not wanting to know.
for some reason this morn as this was rolling around my mind, I recalled my daughter at three years saying: "Mom, I know there's no monster in the toilet; but I'm still scared of it. "
I've studied statistics and laugh at this as it has validity and the abuses are there for all to see.
What's missed sometimes though is the flip side, statistics ( and the history of the study ) can be interesting ( I said it ! ) , they open windows on data, unveiling truths about the natural world that are sometimes non-intuitive or uncanny, and can be elegant. In short though, and somewhat less romantically, they are just another tool.
Look at Norman Fenton's substack, as a statistical whizz, he has been able to refute/rebut a lot of the efficacy claims made by the poison pushers that had been completely missed by many.
If stats are going to be abused, as humans do with all tools, we'll still need the good ones to battle it out.
Brilliant. Thank you for your truth. I might say that Humans using tools for evil are always under the influence of dark energy/souls. Rejoice. These contracts made with the dark are unenforcable.
Dr. Byram W. Bridle logically pointed out the fakes in the paper. thank you.
When I looked at the paper, the author of this paper said that there was no conflict of interest, but this is still an untrustworthy statement. The author states that he receives support from AbbVie.
What is AbbVie?
AbbVie is a large pharmaceutical company with sales of $58 billion and approximately 50,000 employees.
For someone like me, an amateur who can't fully understand the fake logic of a paper, when I look at the source of the funds, I know that 80-90% of the paper is questionable if it comes from a pharmaceutical company.
If AbbVie intends to enter the vaccine market, it will help authors write papers that give vaccines even a slight advantage.
Apparently there are professionals who write fake papers at the request of pharmaceutical companies.
Especially when the field of expertise is different from that of the doctor, the average doctor, due to his/her busy schedule, will likely only read the conclusion of the paper and will not read the content logically, nor will he or she look at conflicts of interest.
They probably won't even look into the details of the company where the funds are coming from.
Dr. Bridle, you are a pearl above measure. THank you for taking the time to explain in detail the flaws in this paper (and open people's eyes to how scientific paper fraud is committed). I am keeping this. I hope one day to show my sister, who think all studies are good.
Outstanding! Well done sir. Thank you thank you thank you for teaching me like I was your first year student. This gives me so much ammo which to share with people. Everyone needs to post this across all of your social media platforms NOW!
Byron, your investor analogy is so wonderfully rich and meaningful. It seriously needs to be elaborated. I have metaphors coming to mind like "taking the jab is to shoot at a moving target", "the jab forces you to invest in a single stock", "you can get some quick returns, but miss out on long term dividends". We need people like you to validate the metaphor.
Love it. There is a video of Kary Mullis, find the interview it is a must see, in it he says, paraphrasing, "the public cannot tell the difference between a good scientist and a bad scientist, and this is the problem". He goes on to say that Fauci is an idiot, a very bad scientist.
Thanks for this critique of the paper. I have seen similar analyses of other papers all leading to the increasingly clear conclusion that all of the Covid-19 shots were and are unsafe, and ineffective at both prevention and disease reduction for all but the most severely at-risk demographic.
So one question that comes to mind is, what is the best public health strategy against new "variants"? It seems to me that people not jabbed by the Covid-19 products dont have to do anything special but eat healthy and get sunlight. What about the jabbed sheeple, the majority in our country and many others? Studies are showing they are more easily infected after more jabs, perhaps because antibody counts go down more quickly. Are they therefore forever locked into getting more frequent jabs?
Krishna e bera. Loved your comments and questions on this post.
From what I have read recently is 5 billion people worldwide have had at least one jab and most likely a second and in the developed countries some are working on their 3rd, 4th and 5th jabs. Excess mortality is skyrocketing in these countries. Being sick is the new normal.
Hospitals are closing on rotating schedules, particularly in smaller outlying communities, airports are canceling flights due to sick personnel, ferries are canceling scheduled runs due to sickness among personnel.
Popular music bands are constantly canceling tour dates due to medical catastrophes, young people all over the globe are dropping dead like flies.
To me the most horrifying thing about this is the on going loss of life, directly attributed to these shots. And the medical cabal is still promoting these shots as our salvation. I honestly wonder if we will survive this onslaught on our worldwide populations.
The Ethical Skeptic has done a lot of analysis on this. Those jabbed >1 year ago are only slightly more likely to contract covid and getting closer to the unjabbed over time. The cancer signal remains catastrophic however.
In addition, given the knowledge of AEs caused, not to mention all the 'mystery' surrounding the deployment, ethically, people need to suck it up and stop taking any more regardless of where that leaves them. Why keep digging or leave doubt for others to succumb?
Albeit moot...as another poster mentions, maybe ( hopefully I guess ) nature is restoring the balance anyway, and it's also becoming the logical choice in light of the knowledge drip of what the shots actually contain, so perhaps they won't have to make such a stark decision.
9/13/23 - Univ of South Carolina Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testifies before South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee re: DNA contamination in Pfizer’s C-19 jabs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY
Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, USC College of Pharmacy:
Excellent learning material on how to read what we are reading. I am only curious what happened to peer-reviewers? Are they not aware of all this? By definition, they should be guarding the integrity of the field, journal and authors. If this happens, what’s the point of using the peer-review process?
PS. What about product placement (or rather “employer” placement) right at the top of the text? Clearly, their perseverance may be stronger than two years two months and counting. Some sort of Stockholm syndrome? Warning the world against them, named clearly in the way enabling identification? Does it help?
Dear Byram, I think you are a terrific person but really, you must spend some energy and reassess all the science you were presented with re: viruses, replication, contagion ect. The entire field of virology is a house of cards built on quick sand. It does not follow the scientific method. It depends entirely on circumstantial evidence.
The general public, however intelligent, are struck only by that which it takes little trouble to understand. They have been told that the interior of the body is something more or less like the contents of a vessel filled with wine, and that this interior is not injured – that we do not become ill, except when germs, originally created morbid, penetrate into it from without, and then become microbes.
The public do not know whether this is true; they do not even know what a microbe is, but they take it on the word of the master; they believe it because it is simple and easy to understand; they believe and they repeat that the microbe makes us ill without inquiring further, because they have not the leisure – nor, perhaps, the capacity – to probe to the depths that which they are asked to believe.”
The premise on which this study is founded ie. that anti-bodies are the only significant indicator of immunity is false. Cellular response along with humoral response (the two arms of the immune system) constitute a robust immune reaction to infection. Cellular response cannot be achieved with injection as it bypasses the mucosal membranes wherein cellular response is initiated.
When will the act of injection rather than the contents of a vial be questioned?
Great write up. I would share this with friends and family but they would explode because their intelligence would be questioned, and "this is just written from a guy I never heard of"
We are living is very sad times. Thank you again for sharing this. It is good information for ME to share with friends that understand and like discussion
Exactly. You just described my life.
not alone. trust me.
True with me: I told a brother-in-law, "There's dada now."
CLICK
I have people like that too, ..... But I always send it anyway !!
Some say I have a combative personality. I don't though, I just don't concern myself with how the Truth is taken by others. Yes, I get called Asshole an awful lot, but that's okay, I know what that means too. lol
One of my favorite slogans of the past 45 years has been "If the truth hurts, .... Change your truths". Some get it, others can't figure out what it means. What can ya do ??
I can not do that, I get scolded and shunned. I am already "not part of my younger daughters family" because I suggested 18 months ago that they should not vaxx their kids. Whoa, the roof blew off
Lol! Many of us are "in the same boat"! I have just ONE relative left whom I communicate with! It's okay. You cannot compromise the truth just because they are oblivious.
I probably get off easy because all my family and friends know how I am already. Translation: The benefits of being That Asshole for many decades. lol
I had a phone conversation back in early 2021 with my next to youngest daughter who is turning thirty soon, about the vaccine. I told her she should not take it and working as a nurse just ensured we were going to have a rough talk. lol In the end she hung up on me and I didn't hear from her for almost a year. In the meantime I started sending her emails every day with covid info and vaxx info and adverse event info, it was awesome. Then one day she actually replied to one of me emails with "Is this really important right now when there are more important things like Roe getting overturned ?? What a way to segue without admitting defeat, ... okay, lets play. The emails went back and forth at a brisk pace and then she stopped responding. go figure. After, I simply added abortion info the the usual covid and vaxx info that I was already emailing her daily. Lets see her try that one again. lol
When it comes to being shunned or ignored, I generally see it as a blessing. I'm not anti-social, I just feel a lot more comfortable with fewer people around. It's better for me, and being a cranky old goat, it's likely better for them also. lol
I understand.
for hubbs and me, just less headaches.
we do not want to upset the children anyway. Mainly, why bother??
Well, why bother? Because I did a shit ton of research on covid, masks and these so-called vaccines and I felt that it might turn out to be very critical if I did not say anything. So I did tell everyone I could, to be very wary and think twice, ..... then told them all the reasons why. If I didn't warn the people I care about, I wouldn't be able to live with myself if it turned out badly for them afterwards.
Precisely what i did too guido. Warn family and friends. Felt I needed too. After all I care and cared about them. Nobody listened. Deaf man’s ears.
Let's face it, most people's eyes would have glazed over early, don't want to know and / or are allergic to following nuanced argument.
So blatant when laid out like this. It's the scientific community that needs to sort itself out, that's a real climb given the current state of it.
This “glazing over” is exactly why I WON’T be sending it to my scientifically challenged, at least twice jabbed sister who got covid naturally anyway.
Lots of my family at this stage are....... 'we know, but we really don't want to know any more' , they listen but kind of aghast, so I just go easy on it now, some of them appear worried, maybe sheepish, about partaking. It's sad to look at, because I think they are right to be worried, and removing any empathy, fleetingly, they do look stupid from this perspective.
Reckon there's a large cohort of people that now know it didn't work ( majority must have hoped yeah ..Or why take it ?), and nuances aside, think is was reasonable to give it a shot, or that it was unlucky, in other words still hopelessly propagandised by pivots in the narrative.
2 years on it's still a marvel to witness it, fear clearly is a huge factor, but then maybe that's the condition which is always just under the surface, easy to exploit, who of us doesn't deal with it, oh wait....the psychos cope pretty well !
I quit talking to my sister about these shots - except to tell her she needn’t take any more since she has natural immunity (that was a little over a year ago). Hope she listened, I don’t want to know at this point.
Damn, if divide and conquer, sowing chaos, further atomising people and messing with family units, were any of the goals of it, looks like job done.
Hope you reunite with your sister, at some point.
we can all hope but .... it does make you wonder if they are really people you need in your life.
I used to tell my sister "You do not need to be best friends with all of your neighbors" long ago when she was disappointed that she could not attain that (hahaha) but the same applies to family.
Honestly, my siblings and I are going through daddy's (he died in June at age 99.5) paperwork, sorting out the long arduous trust accounts and doing the final taxes etc etc. Maybe if we are fortunate to complete this entire thing next year, I really do not have much interest in keeping relationships tight and loving with two nitwits, one a raging liberal and the other an angry raging liberal. They are not pleasant to be around.
So, it does help you to learn and realize what is important.
Sadly
We’re still familial, I just don’t want the added worry of wondering if she’s taken any more poison. She had a bout of cancer and recurrence of shingles and I’ll always wonder if those were due to the poison shots.
"Those " people.
I wonder what they decide you would feel and think if they would try to give you their perspective?
I never cease to be amazed at the strange and exotic person I've become in the minds of family members who have always preferred to define me by their own pre-judgments/prejudices, rather than any actual interchange , communication, or presence.
Now I see how we can be "in two ( or more) places at once!! While I'm being me here , doing what I do and saying what I say, there's another me saying and thinking and feeling and doing what they imagine; and for sure they "speak for me/as me". They know all the ways that I am wrong because those are all the ways they see things differently. They actually never ask how I see things. They already know everything about me, and somehow, I never in any way veer or change from their image of me. A strange inversion: Their image of me is solid and has substance; my actual beingness is illusionary and insubstantial.
Wow!!
Thanks. That's an outrageous and comprehensively linked understanding you've opened the door to.
Are you saying that because your 'beingness' is not beared witness to, that's it"s illusionary?
That kind of makes sense if your 'self' is all that discusses these matters.
Does here not count, or have I missed the point?
What I meant to say...perhaps not well as "dawn broke over marblehead".....is that in their construction of who they need me to be for their purposes....my true self is "a ghost"...insubstantial, has no substance in fact in their judgments; and the illusory me they create is the only one that they can attribute with any real substance.
Have I got this ...going on right? In thinking? It's not the end of it, I'm sure. Just begun
Think I got it, they don't see the real you, lot of that going around!
they don't want to....I was the A+ one; now, they have money and I don't so I'm dumb as a doorknob.
I didn't have to do anything at all. Passion, Aggression, and Ignorance. Ignorance is not wanting to know.
for some reason this morn as this was rolling around my mind, I recalled my daughter at three years saying: "Mom, I know there's no monster in the toilet; but I'm still scared of it. "
Yes I also have friends/family who cannot stand to look at the light. I bode my time and share where I can, when I can.
Yes, same here. 😞
Statistics. Ask a statistician what does the data say and it will reply,
"What do you want the data to say?".
Motivate that person with a great salary and tenure + basic immunity to criticism. What do you have then???
I've studied statistics and laugh at this as it has validity and the abuses are there for all to see.
What's missed sometimes though is the flip side, statistics ( and the history of the study ) can be interesting ( I said it ! ) , they open windows on data, unveiling truths about the natural world that are sometimes non-intuitive or uncanny, and can be elegant. In short though, and somewhat less romantically, they are just another tool.
Look at Norman Fenton's substack, as a statistical whizz, he has been able to refute/rebut a lot of the efficacy claims made by the poison pushers that had been completely missed by many.
If stats are going to be abused, as humans do with all tools, we'll still need the good ones to battle it out.
That a nerdy post if ever I wrote one!
Brilliant. Thank you for your truth. I might say that Humans using tools for evil are always under the influence of dark energy/souls. Rejoice. These contracts made with the dark are unenforcable.
Consummate liars?
Poached eggheads.
Dr. Byram W. Bridle logically pointed out the fakes in the paper. thank you.
When I looked at the paper, the author of this paper said that there was no conflict of interest, but this is still an untrustworthy statement. The author states that he receives support from AbbVie.
What is AbbVie?
AbbVie is a large pharmaceutical company with sales of $58 billion and approximately 50,000 employees.
For someone like me, an amateur who can't fully understand the fake logic of a paper, when I look at the source of the funds, I know that 80-90% of the paper is questionable if it comes from a pharmaceutical company.
If AbbVie intends to enter the vaccine market, it will help authors write papers that give vaccines even a slight advantage.
Apparently there are professionals who write fake papers at the request of pharmaceutical companies.
Especially when the field of expertise is different from that of the doctor, the average doctor, due to his/her busy schedule, will likely only read the conclusion of the paper and will not read the content logically, nor will he or she look at conflicts of interest.
They probably won't even look into the details of the company where the funds are coming from.
Could also act like a kind of interview process for the authors, here's how I could be of further service kind of thing, funds please !
Don't many now have to prostitute themselves to advance in academia?
You're right. We who receive medical care may have no choice but to study and be careful.
Dr. Bridle, you are a pearl above measure. THank you for taking the time to explain in detail the flaws in this paper (and open people's eyes to how scientific paper fraud is committed). I am keeping this. I hope one day to show my sister, who think all studies are good.
Outstanding! Well done sir. Thank you thank you thank you for teaching me like I was your first year student. This gives me so much ammo which to share with people. Everyone needs to post this across all of your social media platforms NOW!
Thank you for this superb and very illuminating analysis (plus take down)!
Byron, your investor analogy is so wonderfully rich and meaningful. It seriously needs to be elaborated. I have metaphors coming to mind like "taking the jab is to shoot at a moving target", "the jab forces you to invest in a single stock", "you can get some quick returns, but miss out on long term dividends". We need people like you to validate the metaphor.
Love it. There is a video of Kary Mullis, find the interview it is a must see, in it he says, paraphrasing, "the public cannot tell the difference between a good scientist and a bad scientist, and this is the problem". He goes on to say that Fauci is an idiot, a very bad scientist.
Thanks for this critique of the paper. I have seen similar analyses of other papers all leading to the increasingly clear conclusion that all of the Covid-19 shots were and are unsafe, and ineffective at both prevention and disease reduction for all but the most severely at-risk demographic.
So one question that comes to mind is, what is the best public health strategy against new "variants"? It seems to me that people not jabbed by the Covid-19 products dont have to do anything special but eat healthy and get sunlight. What about the jabbed sheeple, the majority in our country and many others? Studies are showing they are more easily infected after more jabs, perhaps because antibody counts go down more quickly. Are they therefore forever locked into getting more frequent jabs?
Krishna e bera. Loved your comments and questions on this post.
From what I have read recently is 5 billion people worldwide have had at least one jab and most likely a second and in the developed countries some are working on their 3rd, 4th and 5th jabs. Excess mortality is skyrocketing in these countries. Being sick is the new normal.
Hospitals are closing on rotating schedules, particularly in smaller outlying communities, airports are canceling flights due to sick personnel, ferries are canceling scheduled runs due to sickness among personnel.
Popular music bands are constantly canceling tour dates due to medical catastrophes, young people all over the globe are dropping dead like flies.
To me the most horrifying thing about this is the on going loss of life, directly attributed to these shots. And the medical cabal is still promoting these shots as our salvation. I honestly wonder if we will survive this onslaught on our worldwide populations.
The Ethical Skeptic has done a lot of analysis on this. Those jabbed >1 year ago are only slightly more likely to contract covid and getting closer to the unjabbed over time. The cancer signal remains catastrophic however.
In addition, given the knowledge of AEs caused, not to mention all the 'mystery' surrounding the deployment, ethically, people need to suck it up and stop taking any more regardless of where that leaves them. Why keep digging or leave doubt for others to succumb?
Albeit moot...as another poster mentions, maybe ( hopefully I guess ) nature is restoring the balance anyway, and it's also becoming the logical choice in light of the knowledge drip of what the shots actually contain, so perhaps they won't have to make such a stark decision.
Thank you for the deep dive into interpreting a scientific paper. Interpreting the scientific literature is a job best left to the true experts!
9/13/23 - Univ of South Carolina Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testifies before South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee re: DNA contamination in Pfizer’s C-19 jabs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY
Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, USC College of Pharmacy:
https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/pharmacy/faculty-staff/buckhaults_phillip.php
.
I Think That It Is Great
That The Vaccinated Care So Much.
They Care So Much About Other People.
- Not For Those That Are Dying From The Shots.
No.
They Care So Much
As To Be Willing To Die
To Prove The UnVaccinated Were Right.
.
Excellent learning material on how to read what we are reading. I am only curious what happened to peer-reviewers? Are they not aware of all this? By definition, they should be guarding the integrity of the field, journal and authors. If this happens, what’s the point of using the peer-review process?
PS. What about product placement (or rather “employer” placement) right at the top of the text? Clearly, their perseverance may be stronger than two years two months and counting. Some sort of Stockholm syndrome? Warning the world against them, named clearly in the way enabling identification? Does it help?
mRNA vaccines are all extremely dangerous and completely worthless. Where’s my $500k
Dear Byram, I think you are a terrific person but really, you must spend some energy and reassess all the science you were presented with re: viruses, replication, contagion ect. The entire field of virology is a house of cards built on quick sand. It does not follow the scientific method. It depends entirely on circumstantial evidence.
This is a good place to start: https://drsambailey.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/A-FAREWELL-TO-VIROLOGY-Expert-Edition-English.pdf
Thank you for this link. I’m just getting into this theory, but breaking the 60 years of propaganda can be rigorous, to say the least.
The take-down by Dr. B of this paper is good, much-needed therapy after the constant gaslighting though, so I’ll savor it for a wee bit.
do you post this to every one of his sub stacks? Sylvie, really? Lay off! What are your qualifications to question Dr. Bridle?
No, just this one.
Quote by Antoine Bechamp
The general public, however intelligent, are struck only by that which it takes little trouble to understand. They have been told that the interior of the body is something more or less like the contents of a vessel filled with wine, and that this interior is not injured – that we do not become ill, except when germs, originally created morbid, penetrate into it from without, and then become microbes.
The public do not know whether this is true; they do not even know what a microbe is, but they take it on the word of the master; they believe it because it is simple and easy to understand; they believe and they repeat that the microbe makes us ill without inquiring further, because they have not the leisure – nor, perhaps, the capacity – to probe to the depths that which they are asked to believe.”
The premise on which this study is founded ie. that anti-bodies are the only significant indicator of immunity is false. Cellular response along with humoral response (the two arms of the immune system) constitute a robust immune reaction to infection. Cellular response cannot be achieved with injection as it bypasses the mucosal membranes wherein cellular response is initiated.
When will the act of injection rather than the contents of a vial be questioned?