Thanks Dr Bridle … as only one of two people unjabbed in my entire family it has been an uphill battle trying to breakthrough the mass formation mentality. Articles like this give me much needed ammunition as I will never give up!
I have one sibling who (along with wife and young kids) is 'fully boosted and experiencing now side effects' --- who when I raise the fact that I have multiple friends with Pfizer heart damage says 'how come you know so many of these people' (accusing me of lying???)
I was recently made aware that he as injecting the kids so made a last ditch attempt to convince him to stop (they'd had the first shot at the time).... and was told 'I do not wish to speak of this - we are fine'
I have not said anything about 'this' since and will not say anything going forward otherwise the relationship will be ruined (I live in NZ - he's in Canada)
This anecdote explains the futility of trying to turn a CovIDIOT.
I have a close friend who is a high powered barrister - he firmly believes the Safe and Effective advertising tag line and is 4x shot.
From time to time this topic comes up in a DM conversation (he is overseas) - most recently he informed me that all hell was going to break out in unvaxxed North Korea. I suggested they'd be fine as the death counts in low vaxxed countries are minimal citing
To his credit he watched that video --- to his detriment he said 'but correlation is not causation'.... even when I said -- did you see the excess deaths for low vax countries ... nope - Safe and Effective (Dr Fauci says)..
Ok I says (I am not a trial lawyer so I have to really work hard to keep up to these guys)... what do you think could be causing these dramatic increases that magically follow the covid shots? These are the sort of numbers you'd see if a country was involved in a war .... and very clearly there is no world war happening (with the low vax countries remaining neutral).
So what might be causing all the deaths?
We hesitate here for the drum roll........
After a moment he types - Covid.
I wait ... I think he's stitching me up ... he can't be serious ... maybe he'll delete the comment ... I wait till I see the whites of his eyes.... He does rewind on me.....
Covid? Well then -- if that is the case then surely we need to halt these injections immediately because they are total failure.... How is it possible that so many people are dying when in many of these countries the vax rate is well over 90% and they are supposed to prevent hospitalization and death?
Silence. Then I get a few photos of him and some of the guys out mountain biking... change of topic.
A few days later I am speaking to another mate (also a lawyer) - he's totally against these injections and I mention this earlier discussion with and he says 'he really said Covid? Wow - he's a trial lawyer - he doesn't just blurt out nonsense - and that is just total nonsense'
Not to pick on my friend -- the reason I convey this story is to demonstrate that even a logic machine like that ... can be so totally captured by the mass psychosis ... that he'll spew out total rubbish parroting whatever the MSM has told him to think.
If he cannot accept facts and logic when that is his job to do so --- then what chance does anyone have of turning other CovIDIOTS.
It's close to absolute 0.
Also - by now most of them have been at least double jabbed... if the VAIDS hypothesis is correct - and the strengthening mutations --- it's too late to save these people.
And I do think the VAIDS theory is correct --- I live in Queenstown NZ and the amount of sickness that is raging through this place over the past 3 months is epic. Businesses are struggling to stay open because staff are sick - repeatedly.... and it's not just a minor sniffle - we know of one very fit young couple who are triple jabbed -- they had the Mother of all Flus recently - 104 temp and non-stop painful coughs... they had to go to the ED it was so bad.
QT is a very young town with loads of foreign workers under 30 -- these people are getting sick as dogs -- healthy young people.
I am told that it's a minimum 5 hour wait to get seen at the hospital ED -- if you are not seriously ill they tell you to go home.... of course they are short staffed - a nurse told me 20% of their staff had walked because they are still mandated - the 4th shot is in play -- and many are refusing because they are seeing way too many vax injuries in the ED.
Its the same in Canada but the side effects are being covered up deliberately. Recent example a 42 yo fit healthy doctor dropped dead. Had to be boosted as its mandated in health care. Written off as heart arrythmia. Very common in athletic types.
Yep. As a minister, who knows more than I want to, after writing countless exemption letters, and merging into this community more than I ever thought. I'm now preparing for my career to shift into memorials. What boggles my mind is that not one Ontario institution accepted my RE letters. We'll see what happens this september, may be a second crop of letters to write.
Noone should ever be put in the position of having to choose between an experimental shot and being able to support their family. It would be good if more ministers were to speak up about the lack of ethics amongst our other political ministers. We need the church to speak up and not just toe the party line. This is not directed at you personally. just expressing my frustration at the general silence from the churches as an entity.
I hear you. I concur - which is why when I was asked - I started writing. The amount of people who lack moral fibre is appalling. Letters for school (universities), work, in addition to restaurants/movies, attending sports events(ie gym or arena to tie their kids laces), travel, EI, ... I've covered numerous. The Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled that we can choose for ourself, and our faith is to be respected.
@Kallista, Wow, you sure buried (no pun intended) the lede there! Career shift into memorials? Smart (and sad that it popped up as a social necessity)! Crazy world.
I had no intention to become clergy - no where on my radar. When out for a walk in May of 2021, my friend suggested I would make a good wedding officiant. Voila a side hustle emerged. 4 months later I was busy writing exemption letters. Didn't see that one coming. Clearly Spirit wanted me ordained so I could help a few people keep their jobs or at least get Unemployment insurance, or into restaurants, on an airline.... As a life coach & EFT practitioner my strength is my empathy and insight into humanity, as I help people grow through their next milestone in life. Not everyone is comfortable public speaking, and public speaking becomes harder for some when they need to speak from the heart and/or while grieving. I would prefer to be coaching people, but memorials is just coaching people through the next challenge that surfaced in their life. Life entails suffering, and we do what we can do to reduce it and work our way through it. Memorials - I'd rather prepare in advance than be waylaid when the first one crosses my desk (potentially September). Yes we have a crazy world - and the canaries are dead all around us and as humans we are too stupid to pay attention. I heard about Pottenger about 10 years ago - watching covid just accelerates the dead canaries in the mind. http://kallista.ca/pottenger/
@David, And not just any rando MD but a Type A's Type A. Chief of Blablabla, and long-distance athlete of blabla...that he TOOK the biohazard surprised me. These guys aren't anywhere near as wily as the pharma guys, who know well enough to fake it.
Last year around this time my sister asked why I was so against the vax. I asked her if she really wanted to know, cuz it would take me a long time to go thru my list. She said “maybe another time”. That tells me she really didn’t care to know. However, I put together a 2 page, single space doc for her, complete w links and spelled it out. Her response? We all need to do what’s best for ourselves. That tells me she didn’t even read what I sent. I’m done trying to warn my family. I’ll miss them when they’re gone.
Jul 20, 2022·edited Jul 22, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
You and me both..sounds like we are in the same situation. Myself, along with my two adult children, are the only ones in my extended family who are jab free. I warned them back in January of 2021 about the injections, but to no avail. They all bought the narrative like sheep to slaughter.
Jul 20, 2022·edited Jul 20, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
You can find more ammunition in this new paper (Domazet-Loso, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141755/), which argues that it is plausible and even probable that the mRNA genetic code gets integrated into the human genome through known mechanisms such as reverse transcription. It is also argued that this could even passed on to children. Peter McCullough also gave a talk on this a few months ago.
Basically this means that this whole vaxx campaign was an enormous genetic experiment on humans with yet unknown outcomes which could persist for generations though. Unfortunately, most people did and still do not even consider this possibility, but I am pretty sure that this will gain more traction soon... Just ask your family what they think of being possibly genetically modified without their consent for a disease with a laughable IFR.
Other relevant papers on this DNA topic are: Alden et al. (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073; showing in vitro that reverse transcription occurs in hepatic cells.
You are not alone Susers. I am grateful to Dr. Bridle for publishing this information. If only those who really need to know this would open the minds and eyes to see and read this.
So not only the increased risk of stroke, heart inflammation, neuropathy and mysterious fatigue syndromes. This miracle substance helps you get covid and then reinfections too. Sure sounds like a trillion dollar idea to me.
I have so many people I know that are "fully Pfizer vaxxed" are coming down with Covid for the 3rd and 4th time. I've never been vaxxed, and only had Covid once. I've been around these people in close contact and have not been re-infected. So, my experiences line up with this data.
I haven't had the vax and came down with covid a few weeks ago for the second time. First time was last August, most likely delta - two weeks of all sorts of symptoms, plus another week to fully get the energy back. This second time the symptoms were much, much milder - basically one day of fever and shivers, followed by two days of feeling more tired than normal. Bad cold. Not sure if this was thanks to my previously acquired immunity, or a milder omicron variant... probably a bit of both.
Hi Nat. What you have experienced has proven to be quite common. Many people who got infected with earlier variants got re-infected with Omicron because it has changed enough to start partially evading early acquired immunity. However, this is typical of all the respiratory viruses we live with. Given enough time, they will change enough to be able to re-infect. However, due to the breadth of naturally acquired immunity, these reinfections are typically relatively mild and then our immune system is updated until the virus eventually changes enough again. Where this will be a problem is if people are kept overly isolated from the microbial world. In that case, there is risk of viruses changing so much that previously acquired natural immunity will be so outdated that people will be at risk of more severe infections. Your recent infection will likely keep you well protected for at least several more generations of variants. Unfortunately, I fear that the global use of inoculations that induce poor quality immune responses has been accelerating the mutation rate of SARS-CoV-2. That is usually what happens when a non-lethal selective pressure is applied to a biological entity that is prone to mutation.
Thank you, Dr. Bridle. You are one of several Canadian heroes who have emerged on the national stage. Two questions if you happen to have time to answer (and thanks!):
1. You say "In Canada, we shut-down our task force assigned to monitor acquisition of naturally acquired immunity early in the declared pandemic." - Can you write more about this in future? Was this under direction of WHO or influence of pharma? How did this decision get made?
2. When I shared this info with someone, I was asked "why did mortality go down after the first dose?" (I have lots of thoughts on this, but no science.)
Hi Paz. I have not seen any formal reason provided as to why the goal of monitoring acquisition of natural immunity was abandoned. It would have been one of the most useful pieces of public health data to maintain on website dashboards. Among many other benefits, it would have ensured accurate data about naturally acquired immunity could have been plugged into the infamous epidemiological models that ultimately had numbers for this parameter pulled out of a hat. I have not seen any reliable, transparently presented data that convince me that mortality went down as a result of the first dose. There are many alternative explanations, including but limited to things like: 1. Many of the highest-risk individuals succumbed, unfortunately, to COVID-19 in the early waves, leaving less susceptible people, which happened to correlate with when the first dose was being rolled out. 2. More concerningly, there is evidence that deaths that occurred after the first dose where artificially attributed to the unvaxxed. This is because a person was note deemed to have been vaxxed with a first dose until 14 days after receiving the first dose. Remarkably, public health data from Alberta clearly showed an alarming association with the first dose and acquisition of COVID-19. The vast majority of people who acquired COVID-19 after the first dose got the disease with the first 14 days. This temporal clustering of cases did not match the largely random timing of administration of first doses, which were rolled out over many months. It suggests the first dose was promoting acquisition of COVID-19. However, most of these cases and any related deaths were, by definition being attributed to the unvaxxed. No surprisingly, the Alberta government took this data off their website once scientists around the world cast a spotlight on it. I'll see if I can find some time to write a quick substack article about this latter issue.
I have Dr. Bride's open letter. 9 pages that he wrote in September. I've been writing RE letters, so been in this conversation more than I wanted to be. But someone had to write the RE letters and most clerics won't. Email me and I'll send you the letter. Celebrant@kallista.ca
Ask your (and every) doctor the "Pro or Ho" question.
Is your doctor a medical professional or a paid whore for the pharma cartel? A simple question for your doctor to determine if they are a "Pro or Ho":
"Should healthy children under the age of 12 get the shots?".
If the answer isn't "NO" then you have a "Ho". There is no "yes" or "it depends". The IFR for healthy kids is so far to the right of the decimal that they have a statistically ZERO chance of dying from covid. It is of zero benefit for them to get the shots. It also is of zero benefit to anyone else because they will still get it and transmit it, injected or not.
Dr. Bridle. Thankyou for this post. Having refused to be vaccinated and age 72 years old, I am so glad I have made this decision. In my extended family of 20 people I am the only one who has chosen this path. At this point 12 of the 19 vaxxed family has had covid. I tried to talk some of them out of making this decision but it fell on deaf ears. I am beginning to think we may be experiencing a die off, almost like an extinction event. At the very least vaccinated people seem to be getting sick on a constant basis. While most work places and industries are up and running, the staff certainly isn't. The absentee rate in British Columbia Ferries was on average 5% prior covid. It's now at 11%. Hospitals are barely functioning due to the same problem. Am wondering what the current absentee rate is for our airlines and related industries.
Wow - absentee rate doubling and then some.... With my clients. I'm a minister (writing RE letters) and a life coach. I have clients that are burnt out (I don't know their vax status) as the lockdowns/working from home,... has been taking it's toll in addition to every day job/life stress. I have clients who are pure bloods, and are burnt out from having to deal with; fear of job loss, masking, the ostracization, the nazi colleagues who are insisting on masks, ... Masking weakens the body. The covid experience(lock downs, etc) has been taxing on everybody the last two years.
Honestly...thank you for writing these articles. It's been a tough stance to remain unjabbed (former ICU RN). Keep pumping out the Truth and REAL Science. People have to start connecting the dots FFS 🙄
Yeah, I’ve heard that one before, too many times to count, from a physicist friend who should know better, but doesn’t. I’ve decided they just don’t want to know. That is the only explanation that makes sense anymore. They took the shots, they’re prepared to take more shots and the cognitive dissonance would be too much to bear if they admitted they’d made a mistake. So it’s always, “Science takes longer to decide.” “Maybe in five years, we’ll know more.” “The science isn’t settled yet.” And my favorite so far, “We will probably never know!!” Lol. As they say, “denial ain’t just a river in Egypt.”
Finally, your doctor is right, "more study is necessary". If only she had realized that, and put it in to practice 24 months ago she could have served her patients so much better.
In answer to your set of question, I think there are several reasons. 1. The medical system is suffering a kind of obsessive compulsive disorder - banging its head against the wall continuously to relieve its headache, despite the fact that is clearly not working. 2. Elements of this established order are heavily invested in an experiment, hoping to the find the "universal vaccine" (that will allow them to conquer nature once and for all) or experiment generally without a particular outcome in mind. 3. Make money and create customers. Repeated does of something makes a lot more money than one-off vaccination.
Though it will be no surprise to readers, this does not bode well for any foreseeable end to this pandemic.
It should put an end to vaccinations, certainly in children. It won't!
And, if Geert Vanden Bossche is correct (he's been spot on thus far), the vaccinated are in for a very rough ride if the virus follows his predicted evolutionary pathway. More virulent, with disease moving into the lower respiratory system.
Jul 20, 2022·edited Jul 20, 2022Liked by Dr. Byram W. Bridle
Dr. Bridle- I have been using that same ON graph for months when arguing with CBCers, but they always say look at the ON Science Table data, which shows a completely different picture (unvaxxed greatly outnumbering vaxxed in hosp./ICU/deaths). Since Omicron hit that same graph you used above has been showing unvaxxed way below vaxxed in those areas. Why such large discrepencies in two Province of ON databases? I suspect it's because the OST uses data from when Delta was around, but as the study above shows, the shots were no more effective then. Thoughts?
Hi Patrick. The Ontario Science Table manipulates the data in ways that are not properly described in any materials and methods section of their documents. Their data is anything but transparent. However, some of their manipulations are well known. For example, when it comes to comparisons between the vaxxed and unvaxxed, they have had the audacity to pool data starting from as early as December 2020. This means that the data include timepoints when nobody in Canada was vaxxed and for huge swaths of the time, most were unvaxxed. All those deaths, hospitalizations, etc. that occurred when nobody was vaxxed or relatively few were vaxxed introduces a strong bias against the unvaxxed. In my professional opinion, data from the self-appointed Science Table is untrustworthy in the absence of full disclosure of their raw data and methods to manipulate them. For example, how many of their epidemiological models have they disclosed? Also, it has many members with numerous and serious conflicts of interest and their members represent a relatively limited scope of expertise (look at how many immunologists sit on this committee that is giving recommendations about vaccines [vaccinology is a sub-discipline of immunology]). The members also represent a limited set of demographics (look at how many are from U of Toronto versus other academic institutions from across the province).
Dr. Peter Juni, former head of the Science Table, and I served as expert witnesses in a court case. I wrote about this experience. In the article I provided copies of my expert report and his (both are part of the public record). If anyone were to read both of them, I think it would become very clear who has been doing a better job of truly following the science rather than manipulating data in mysterious ways. Here is the previous article: https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-mandates
Dr. Bridle: But doesn't this bolster the "effective" part of the tired "safe & effective" mantra the Covid vax fanatics crow about ad nauseum? They will say that this is "proof" the vaccines were effective as deaths and hospitalizations would have much worse if the shots weren't released, and they will point to the pre-vax data to support it. I know there are/were data shananigans going on ...I just wish I was able to to prove it.
Hi Patrick. No, it doesn't bolster the 'effective' part of the narrative. Pfizer's own published report of their six-month update to their clinical trial clearly showed that the efficacy against the original Wuhan strain was very minimal (only a 0.84% absolute risk reduction), with no statistically significant reduction in hospitalizations or deaths. In fact, there were more deaths in the vaccinated arm of the study (although it was not statistically significantly higher). Also, the minor efficacy is largely offset by the adverse events that have been reported. These data are far more reliable than any real world data because they were acquired in the context of a clinical trial, which is typically much more stringent in the acquisition of data. Here is a video that I assisted with that describes what I just mentioned: https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html
A lot of the apparent 'effectiveness' of the shots compared to earlier timepoints was likely due to a lot of confounding factors including but not limited to the death of the most vulnerable prior to the rollout and progressively less virulent variants of the virus.
Thank you. I'm sure you recall the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" hysteria last year. If this was false, and it's looking like it was, this would be an unbelievable outrage. I gave up a 20-year teaching career with my employer to remain unjabbed ..I'm not an "anti vaxxer"....but this all felt contrived and Orwellian from the get-go.
Appreciate your posts and your integrity...I can imagine the pressure you must be facing to conform to the official narrative. Stand strong!
Isnt it the case that the OST used data that went back as far as April 2020 when noone had the shots? so their base is different from the data post Omicron.
Hi David. I had mentioned Dec. 2020 off the top of my head, but I think that you are correct that their data went even further back, thereby biasing all of the bad outcomes even further so they could be attributed to the unvaxxed. Many people don't realize how misleading the Science Table's data have been. In my opinion, it is a clear case of academic misconduct.
Yes I'm sure that's the case. But that gives the "safe & effective" mob more ammo...and I've always had a sneaking suspicion this "pandemic of the unvaccinated" was manufactured BS using skewed stats and CovidScience™.
- From 19 Sept. 2021 to 24 Oct. 2021, the 7-day moving average of case rates per 100K is slightly lower for "full_vac" than for "partial_vac", which in turn is much lower than for "unvac".
On the other hand, from 17 March 2022 through 7 May, the only two categories are "full-vac" and "boost_vac", and the positions are reversed: the boosted have a higher rate of cases per 100k. (There's no data between these two ranges.)
For age group "60-79yrs", the vaccine advantage is much greater in 2021; however, it has no data past 23 Oct. 2021.
For age group "80+", the data exists only for Sept. & Oct. 2021. The rates for both "partial_vac" and "full_vac" are very low; "unvac" is many times higher.
Age is a known risk factor; so doesn't the above chart of "ALL" ages suffer from selection bias or this confounding factor? I'm not a statistician, so I don't know the right words.
Secondly, Neither data set accounts for recovery from previous COVID infection, which as you say confers immunity. Isn't that a confounding factor?
And then there's survivor bias, which I'm guessing would be more significant in the older groups.
Great post, and great questions that need answers! I am so frustrated by the injustice, that I (as uninjected) can’t visit my Mom in long term care home (I have natural immunity) whereas my siblings (boosted & no natural immunity) can go. No one has said anything outright, but no doubt they think it selfish of me to cede my visitation rights by not getting the shots. I can’t believe 2.5 years into this, the nonsensical rules still run rampant.
Same here in Italy - my hubby cannot visit his 98 year old father, as he not been jabbed - he had covid in January and has natural immunity. But his 4 times jabbed brother can - it's so very wrong and inhumane.
Thanks Dr Bridle … as only one of two people unjabbed in my entire family it has been an uphill battle trying to breakthrough the mass formation mentality. Articles like this give me much needed ammunition as I will never give up!
I have one sibling who (along with wife and young kids) is 'fully boosted and experiencing now side effects' --- who when I raise the fact that I have multiple friends with Pfizer heart damage says 'how come you know so many of these people' (accusing me of lying???)
I was recently made aware that he as injecting the kids so made a last ditch attempt to convince him to stop (they'd had the first shot at the time).... and was told 'I do not wish to speak of this - we are fine'
I have not said anything about 'this' since and will not say anything going forward otherwise the relationship will be ruined (I live in NZ - he's in Canada)
This anecdote explains the futility of trying to turn a CovIDIOT.
I have a close friend who is a high powered barrister - he firmly believes the Safe and Effective advertising tag line and is 4x shot.
From time to time this topic comes up in a DM conversation (he is overseas) - most recently he informed me that all hell was going to break out in unvaxxed North Korea. I suggested they'd be fine as the death counts in low vaxxed countries are minimal citing
https://metatron.substack.com/p/covid-requiem-aeternam?s=r
To his credit he watched that video --- to his detriment he said 'but correlation is not causation'.... even when I said -- did you see the excess deaths for low vax countries ... nope - Safe and Effective (Dr Fauci says)..
Ok I says (I am not a trial lawyer so I have to really work hard to keep up to these guys)... what do you think could be causing these dramatic increases that magically follow the covid shots? These are the sort of numbers you'd see if a country was involved in a war .... and very clearly there is no world war happening (with the low vax countries remaining neutral).
So what might be causing all the deaths?
We hesitate here for the drum roll........
After a moment he types - Covid.
I wait ... I think he's stitching me up ... he can't be serious ... maybe he'll delete the comment ... I wait till I see the whites of his eyes.... He does rewind on me.....
Covid? Well then -- if that is the case then surely we need to halt these injections immediately because they are total failure.... How is it possible that so many people are dying when in many of these countries the vax rate is well over 90% and they are supposed to prevent hospitalization and death?
Silence. Then I get a few photos of him and some of the guys out mountain biking... change of topic.
A few days later I am speaking to another mate (also a lawyer) - he's totally against these injections and I mention this earlier discussion with and he says 'he really said Covid? Wow - he's a trial lawyer - he doesn't just blurt out nonsense - and that is just total nonsense'
Not to pick on my friend -- the reason I convey this story is to demonstrate that even a logic machine like that ... can be so totally captured by the mass psychosis ... that he'll spew out total rubbish parroting whatever the MSM has told him to think.
If he cannot accept facts and logic when that is his job to do so --- then what chance does anyone have of turning other CovIDIOTS.
It's close to absolute 0.
Also - by now most of them have been at least double jabbed... if the VAIDS hypothesis is correct - and the strengthening mutations --- it's too late to save these people.
And I do think the VAIDS theory is correct --- I live in Queenstown NZ and the amount of sickness that is raging through this place over the past 3 months is epic. Businesses are struggling to stay open because staff are sick - repeatedly.... and it's not just a minor sniffle - we know of one very fit young couple who are triple jabbed -- they had the Mother of all Flus recently - 104 temp and non-stop painful coughs... they had to go to the ED it was so bad.
QT is a very young town with loads of foreign workers under 30 -- these people are getting sick as dogs -- healthy young people.
I am told that it's a minimum 5 hour wait to get seen at the hospital ED -- if you are not seriously ill they tell you to go home.... of course they are short staffed - a nurse told me 20% of their staff had walked because they are still mandated - the 4th shot is in play -- and many are refusing because they are seeing way too many vax injuries in the ED.
This is a nation wide problem https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/129096215/urgent-care-medical-practice-closes-hours-early-overwhelmed-by-demand
And it's gonna get worse.
Ironically we were told that we needed to get vaxxed to prevent the hospitals from being overwhelmed....
We are past the point of no return on this ... I can't be bothered to get into any more confrontations with the CovIDIOTS.
The problem is - when too many of the crash and burn the supply chain will collapse.
And we'll starve.
Its the same in Canada but the side effects are being covered up deliberately. Recent example a 42 yo fit healthy doctor dropped dead. Had to be boosted as its mandated in health care. Written off as heart arrythmia. Very common in athletic types.
Yep. As a minister, who knows more than I want to, after writing countless exemption letters, and merging into this community more than I ever thought. I'm now preparing for my career to shift into memorials. What boggles my mind is that not one Ontario institution accepted my RE letters. We'll see what happens this september, may be a second crop of letters to write.
Noone should ever be put in the position of having to choose between an experimental shot and being able to support their family. It would be good if more ministers were to speak up about the lack of ethics amongst our other political ministers. We need the church to speak up and not just toe the party line. This is not directed at you personally. just expressing my frustration at the general silence from the churches as an entity.
I hear you. I concur - which is why when I was asked - I started writing. The amount of people who lack moral fibre is appalling. Letters for school (universities), work, in addition to restaurants/movies, attending sports events(ie gym or arena to tie their kids laces), travel, EI, ... I've covered numerous. The Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled that we can choose for ourself, and our faith is to be respected.
Agreed but that hasnt stopped Trudeau yet.
I still say that the churches need to speak up with one voice against the harms being done aganist Canadian society.
@Kallista, Wow, you sure buried (no pun intended) the lede there! Career shift into memorials? Smart (and sad that it popped up as a social necessity)! Crazy world.
I had no intention to become clergy - no where on my radar. When out for a walk in May of 2021, my friend suggested I would make a good wedding officiant. Voila a side hustle emerged. 4 months later I was busy writing exemption letters. Didn't see that one coming. Clearly Spirit wanted me ordained so I could help a few people keep their jobs or at least get Unemployment insurance, or into restaurants, on an airline.... As a life coach & EFT practitioner my strength is my empathy and insight into humanity, as I help people grow through their next milestone in life. Not everyone is comfortable public speaking, and public speaking becomes harder for some when they need to speak from the heart and/or while grieving. I would prefer to be coaching people, but memorials is just coaching people through the next challenge that surfaced in their life. Life entails suffering, and we do what we can do to reduce it and work our way through it. Memorials - I'd rather prepare in advance than be waylaid when the first one crosses my desk (potentially September). Yes we have a crazy world - and the canaries are dead all around us and as humans we are too stupid to pay attention. I heard about Pottenger about 10 years ago - watching covid just accelerates the dead canaries in the mind. http://kallista.ca/pottenger/
Thanks for a meaty reply. I hear you on all levels.
@David, And not just any rando MD but a Type A's Type A. Chief of Blablabla, and long-distance athlete of blabla...that he TOOK the biohazard surprised me. These guys aren't anywhere near as wily as the pharma guys, who know well enough to fake it.
Last year around this time my sister asked why I was so against the vax. I asked her if she really wanted to know, cuz it would take me a long time to go thru my list. She said “maybe another time”. That tells me she really didn’t care to know. However, I put together a 2 page, single space doc for her, complete w links and spelled it out. Her response? We all need to do what’s best for ourselves. That tells me she didn’t even read what I sent. I’m done trying to warn my family. I’ll miss them when they’re gone.
@FastEddy, We'll win. Won't be pretty. Keep the FAITH.
Same Fast Eddy on Truth?
There is only one Fast Eddy ....
You and me both..sounds like we are in the same situation. Myself, along with my two adult children, are the only ones in my extended family who are jab free. I warned them back in January of 2021 about the injections, but to no avail. They all bought the narrative like sheep to slaughter.
You can find more ammunition in this new paper (Domazet-Loso, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141755/), which argues that it is plausible and even probable that the mRNA genetic code gets integrated into the human genome through known mechanisms such as reverse transcription. It is also argued that this could even passed on to children. Peter McCullough also gave a talk on this a few months ago.
Basically this means that this whole vaxx campaign was an enormous genetic experiment on humans with yet unknown outcomes which could persist for generations though. Unfortunately, most people did and still do not even consider this possibility, but I am pretty sure that this will gain more traction soon... Just ask your family what they think of being possibly genetically modified without their consent for a disease with a laughable IFR.
Other relevant papers on this DNA topic are: Alden et al. (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073; showing in vitro that reverse transcription occurs in hepatic cells.
You are not alone Susers. I am grateful to Dr. Bridle for publishing this information. If only those who really need to know this would open the minds and eyes to see and read this.
So not only the increased risk of stroke, heart inflammation, neuropathy and mysterious fatigue syndromes. This miracle substance helps you get covid and then reinfections too. Sure sounds like a trillion dollar idea to me.
I have so many people I know that are "fully Pfizer vaxxed" are coming down with Covid for the 3rd and 4th time. I've never been vaxxed, and only had Covid once. I've been around these people in close contact and have not been re-infected. So, my experiences line up with this data.
I haven't had the vax and came down with covid a few weeks ago for the second time. First time was last August, most likely delta - two weeks of all sorts of symptoms, plus another week to fully get the energy back. This second time the symptoms were much, much milder - basically one day of fever and shivers, followed by two days of feeling more tired than normal. Bad cold. Not sure if this was thanks to my previously acquired immunity, or a milder omicron variant... probably a bit of both.
Hi Nat. What you have experienced has proven to be quite common. Many people who got infected with earlier variants got re-infected with Omicron because it has changed enough to start partially evading early acquired immunity. However, this is typical of all the respiratory viruses we live with. Given enough time, they will change enough to be able to re-infect. However, due to the breadth of naturally acquired immunity, these reinfections are typically relatively mild and then our immune system is updated until the virus eventually changes enough again. Where this will be a problem is if people are kept overly isolated from the microbial world. In that case, there is risk of viruses changing so much that previously acquired natural immunity will be so outdated that people will be at risk of more severe infections. Your recent infection will likely keep you well protected for at least several more generations of variants. Unfortunately, I fear that the global use of inoculations that induce poor quality immune responses has been accelerating the mutation rate of SARS-CoV-2. That is usually what happens when a non-lethal selective pressure is applied to a biological entity that is prone to mutation.
Thank you, Dr. Bridle. You are one of several Canadian heroes who have emerged on the national stage. Two questions if you happen to have time to answer (and thanks!):
1. You say "In Canada, we shut-down our task force assigned to monitor acquisition of naturally acquired immunity early in the declared pandemic." - Can you write more about this in future? Was this under direction of WHO or influence of pharma? How did this decision get made?
2. When I shared this info with someone, I was asked "why did mortality go down after the first dose?" (I have lots of thoughts on this, but no science.)
Hi Paz. I have not seen any formal reason provided as to why the goal of monitoring acquisition of natural immunity was abandoned. It would have been one of the most useful pieces of public health data to maintain on website dashboards. Among many other benefits, it would have ensured accurate data about naturally acquired immunity could have been plugged into the infamous epidemiological models that ultimately had numbers for this parameter pulled out of a hat. I have not seen any reliable, transparently presented data that convince me that mortality went down as a result of the first dose. There are many alternative explanations, including but limited to things like: 1. Many of the highest-risk individuals succumbed, unfortunately, to COVID-19 in the early waves, leaving less susceptible people, which happened to correlate with when the first dose was being rolled out. 2. More concerningly, there is evidence that deaths that occurred after the first dose where artificially attributed to the unvaxxed. This is because a person was note deemed to have been vaxxed with a first dose until 14 days after receiving the first dose. Remarkably, public health data from Alberta clearly showed an alarming association with the first dose and acquisition of COVID-19. The vast majority of people who acquired COVID-19 after the first dose got the disease with the first 14 days. This temporal clustering of cases did not match the largely random timing of administration of first doses, which were rolled out over many months. It suggests the first dose was promoting acquisition of COVID-19. However, most of these cases and any related deaths were, by definition being attributed to the unvaxxed. No surprisingly, the Alberta government took this data off their website once scientists around the world cast a spotlight on it. I'll see if I can find some time to write a quick substack article about this latter issue.
I have Dr. Bride's open letter. 9 pages that he wrote in September. I've been writing RE letters, so been in this conversation more than I wanted to be. But someone had to write the RE letters and most clerics won't. Email me and I'll send you the letter. Celebrant@kallista.ca
I just emailed you. God bless you for doing what you can to help people.
Thank you for this kind offer. I have that open letter saved as a PDF. Do you mean I'll find answers to my questions there? What are "RE" letters?
Yes - re-read it. Whether it is Guelph U or other spots - they didn't want the competent on the panels/committees. RE = Religious Exemption
Thanks!
Ask your (and every) doctor the "Pro or Ho" question.
Is your doctor a medical professional or a paid whore for the pharma cartel? A simple question for your doctor to determine if they are a "Pro or Ho":
"Should healthy children under the age of 12 get the shots?".
If the answer isn't "NO" then you have a "Ho". There is no "yes" or "it depends". The IFR for healthy kids is so far to the right of the decimal that they have a statistically ZERO chance of dying from covid. It is of zero benefit for them to get the shots. It also is of zero benefit to anyone else because they will still get it and transmit it, injected or not.
ASK YOUR DOCTOR.
HO for SHO
Dr. Bridle. Thankyou for this post. Having refused to be vaccinated and age 72 years old, I am so glad I have made this decision. In my extended family of 20 people I am the only one who has chosen this path. At this point 12 of the 19 vaxxed family has had covid. I tried to talk some of them out of making this decision but it fell on deaf ears. I am beginning to think we may be experiencing a die off, almost like an extinction event. At the very least vaccinated people seem to be getting sick on a constant basis. While most work places and industries are up and running, the staff certainly isn't. The absentee rate in British Columbia Ferries was on average 5% prior covid. It's now at 11%. Hospitals are barely functioning due to the same problem. Am wondering what the current absentee rate is for our airlines and related industries.
Wow - absentee rate doubling and then some.... With my clients. I'm a minister (writing RE letters) and a life coach. I have clients that are burnt out (I don't know their vax status) as the lockdowns/working from home,... has been taking it's toll in addition to every day job/life stress. I have clients who are pure bloods, and are burnt out from having to deal with; fear of job loss, masking, the ostracization, the nazi colleagues who are insisting on masks, ... Masking weakens the body. The covid experience(lock downs, etc) has been taxing on everybody the last two years.
Honestly...thank you for writing these articles. It's been a tough stance to remain unjabbed (former ICU RN). Keep pumping out the Truth and REAL Science. People have to start connecting the dots FFS 🙄
Another piece to send to my doctor, who is getting tired of arguing with me. :-)
Ask him the "Pro or Ho" question!!! I think my doc is trying to shove me off onto a newb at the clinic LOL.
She just keeps telling me the stuff I am sending her is not true. When I sent her the recent
Doshi/Kaplan study, she clung to the "more study is necessary" argument. :-)
Yeah, I’ve heard that one before, too many times to count, from a physicist friend who should know better, but doesn’t. I’ve decided they just don’t want to know. That is the only explanation that makes sense anymore. They took the shots, they’re prepared to take more shots and the cognitive dissonance would be too much to bear if they admitted they’d made a mistake. So it’s always, “Science takes longer to decide.” “Maybe in five years, we’ll know more.” “The science isn’t settled yet.” And my favorite so far, “We will probably never know!!” Lol. As they say, “denial ain’t just a river in Egypt.”
Their ego is at stake. "When one's psychological safety is at stake, their not interested in the truth" (rephrased from Geneen Roth)
Finally, your doctor is right, "more study is necessary". If only she had realized that, and put it in to practice 24 months ago she could have served her patients so much better.
In answer to your set of question, I think there are several reasons. 1. The medical system is suffering a kind of obsessive compulsive disorder - banging its head against the wall continuously to relieve its headache, despite the fact that is clearly not working. 2. Elements of this established order are heavily invested in an experiment, hoping to the find the "universal vaccine" (that will allow them to conquer nature once and for all) or experiment generally without a particular outcome in mind. 3. Make money and create customers. Repeated does of something makes a lot more money than one-off vaccination.
Dr. Bridle,
Thank you for keeping us up to date with the science. So grateful for your work! Another Hero for humanity!
Though it will be no surprise to readers, this does not bode well for any foreseeable end to this pandemic.
It should put an end to vaccinations, certainly in children. It won't!
And, if Geert Vanden Bossche is correct (he's been spot on thus far), the vaccinated are in for a very rough ride if the virus follows his predicted evolutionary pathway. More virulent, with disease moving into the lower respiratory system.
There are some difficult times ahead.
Dr. Bridle- I have been using that same ON graph for months when arguing with CBCers, but they always say look at the ON Science Table data, which shows a completely different picture (unvaxxed greatly outnumbering vaxxed in hosp./ICU/deaths). Since Omicron hit that same graph you used above has been showing unvaxxed way below vaxxed in those areas. Why such large discrepencies in two Province of ON databases? I suspect it's because the OST uses data from when Delta was around, but as the study above shows, the shots were no more effective then. Thoughts?
Hi Patrick. The Ontario Science Table manipulates the data in ways that are not properly described in any materials and methods section of their documents. Their data is anything but transparent. However, some of their manipulations are well known. For example, when it comes to comparisons between the vaxxed and unvaxxed, they have had the audacity to pool data starting from as early as December 2020. This means that the data include timepoints when nobody in Canada was vaxxed and for huge swaths of the time, most were unvaxxed. All those deaths, hospitalizations, etc. that occurred when nobody was vaxxed or relatively few were vaxxed introduces a strong bias against the unvaxxed. In my professional opinion, data from the self-appointed Science Table is untrustworthy in the absence of full disclosure of their raw data and methods to manipulate them. For example, how many of their epidemiological models have they disclosed? Also, it has many members with numerous and serious conflicts of interest and their members represent a relatively limited scope of expertise (look at how many immunologists sit on this committee that is giving recommendations about vaccines [vaccinology is a sub-discipline of immunology]). The members also represent a limited set of demographics (look at how many are from U of Toronto versus other academic institutions from across the province).
Dr. Peter Juni, former head of the Science Table, and I served as expert witnesses in a court case. I wrote about this experience. In the article I provided copies of my expert report and his (both are part of the public record). If anyone were to read both of them, I think it would become very clear who has been doing a better job of truly following the science rather than manipulating data in mysterious ways. Here is the previous article: https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-mandates
Dr. Bridle: But doesn't this bolster the "effective" part of the tired "safe & effective" mantra the Covid vax fanatics crow about ad nauseum? They will say that this is "proof" the vaccines were effective as deaths and hospitalizations would have much worse if the shots weren't released, and they will point to the pre-vax data to support it. I know there are/were data shananigans going on ...I just wish I was able to to prove it.
Hi Patrick. No, it doesn't bolster the 'effective' part of the narrative. Pfizer's own published report of their six-month update to their clinical trial clearly showed that the efficacy against the original Wuhan strain was very minimal (only a 0.84% absolute risk reduction), with no statistically significant reduction in hospitalizations or deaths. In fact, there were more deaths in the vaccinated arm of the study (although it was not statistically significantly higher). Also, the minor efficacy is largely offset by the adverse events that have been reported. These data are far more reliable than any real world data because they were acquired in the context of a clinical trial, which is typically much more stringent in the acquisition of data. Here is a video that I assisted with that describes what I just mentioned: https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html
A lot of the apparent 'effectiveness' of the shots compared to earlier timepoints was likely due to a lot of confounding factors including but not limited to the death of the most vulnerable prior to the rollout and progressively less virulent variants of the virus.
Thank you. I'm sure you recall the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" hysteria last year. If this was false, and it's looking like it was, this would be an unbelievable outrage. I gave up a 20-year teaching career with my employer to remain unjabbed ..I'm not an "anti vaxxer"....but this all felt contrived and Orwellian from the get-go.
Appreciate your posts and your integrity...I can imagine the pressure you must be facing to conform to the official narrative. Stand strong!
Isnt it the case that the OST used data that went back as far as April 2020 when noone had the shots? so their base is different from the data post Omicron.
Hi David. I had mentioned Dec. 2020 off the top of my head, but I think that you are correct that their data went even further back, thereby biasing all of the bad outcomes even further so they could be attributed to the unvaxxed. Many people don't realize how misleading the Science Table's data have been. In my opinion, it is a clear case of academic misconduct.
Yes I'm sure that's the case. But that gives the "safe & effective" mob more ammo...and I've always had a sneaking suspicion this "pandemic of the unvaccinated" was manufactured BS using skewed stats and CovidScience™.
First thought: Bridle's graph above of "COVID-19 Cases by Vaccination Status" is for "ALL" age groups, and for mid-March 2022 to mid-April 2022.
If you go to
https://data.ontario.ca/en/dataset/covid-19-vaccine-data-in-ontario/resource/c08620e0-a055-4d35-8cec-875a459642c3
and filter on age group, e.g. "40-59yrs":
- From 19 Sept. 2021 to 24 Oct. 2021, the 7-day moving average of case rates per 100K is slightly lower for "full_vac" than for "partial_vac", which in turn is much lower than for "unvac".
On the other hand, from 17 March 2022 through 7 May, the only two categories are "full-vac" and "boost_vac", and the positions are reversed: the boosted have a higher rate of cases per 100k. (There's no data between these two ranges.)
For age group "60-79yrs", the vaccine advantage is much greater in 2021; however, it has no data past 23 Oct. 2021.
For age group "80+", the data exists only for Sept. & Oct. 2021. The rates for both "partial_vac" and "full_vac" are very low; "unvac" is many times higher.
Age is a known risk factor; so doesn't the above chart of "ALL" ages suffer from selection bias or this confounding factor? I'm not a statistician, so I don't know the right words.
Secondly, Neither data set accounts for recovery from previous COVID infection, which as you say confers immunity. Isn't that a confounding factor?
And then there's survivor bias, which I'm guessing would be more significant in the older groups.
Wonder how this one slipped past the censors ;))
Are they losing their nerve or slowly defecting back to sanity?
They really have no fear of any repercussions. Which means....
This some of my friends and relatives might read. Thanks.
#VIAIDS, #ADE, antigenic imprinting.
Great post, and great questions that need answers! I am so frustrated by the injustice, that I (as uninjected) can’t visit my Mom in long term care home (I have natural immunity) whereas my siblings (boosted & no natural immunity) can go. No one has said anything outright, but no doubt they think it selfish of me to cede my visitation rights by not getting the shots. I can’t believe 2.5 years into this, the nonsensical rules still run rampant.
Same here in Italy - my hubby cannot visit his 98 year old father, as he not been jabbed - he had covid in January and has natural immunity. But his 4 times jabbed brother can - it's so very wrong and inhumane.
Yes 😢