Risk of Heart Complications is Higher After COVID-19 Injections

A Colleague's Elegant Presentation of the Real Science

I am a proud member of the Canadian COVID Care Alliance (CCCA), which is a group of hundreds of scientists, physicians, and other health care professionals from across Canada, with even more members of the public. It is a safe place where the science and politics underpinning COVID-19 can be discussed, questioned and debated in a respectful, well-organized fashion, and in the absence of judgement, accusations and censorship. I serve on their Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee, which makes sure that content from the CCCA meets very rigorous scientific standards.

One of my colleagues at the CCCA, Deanna, recently gave a brilliant presentation that addressed the question of whether acquisition of COVID-19 or receipt of a COVID-19 jab presents a greater risk of causing heart complications.

I have seen some of my academic colleagues go so far as to publicly state that COVID-19 represents a greater risk than the inoculations based on the assumption that reports in the Canadian Adverse Events Following Immunization Surveillance System (CAEFISS) accurately capture the full spectrum of the problem! This is utterly ridiculous. They don’t seem to understand that a critical weakness of systems that rely on passive safety monitoring is that they underestimate adverse events to a substantial but difficult-to-define degree. This may be exaggerated in the context of COVID-19, where anything that goes against the prevailing ‘narrative’ is deemed circumspect and individuals reporting such things risk being publicly vilified. In stark contrast, public health officials have generally been diligent and have invested vast resources into accurately tracking ‘cases’ of COVID-19. Further, there has been little done to disentangle the cause of heart problems in people that have had both COVID-19 and COVID-19 inoculations, with much of the blame automatically being placed on the former.

There are many other flaws in the science being used to promote the misinformed public conclusion that ‘COVID-19 causes more heart complications than the inoculations, so load up on the latter to avoid the former’. But I will stop here and simply refer you to a video presentation from Deanna, whose expertise and scientific integrity I can vouch for. The content was vetted by the Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee of the CCCA. It is a fabulous presentation of the real science. It pulls together a lot of data that have been ‘hidden in plain sight’ and highlights multiple fatal flaws in the ‘science’ being pushed by the misinformed ‘narrative’.

So, if you can carve out an hour of your time, sit back and see how experts of integrity follow the science…

RISK OF HEART COMPLICATIONS IS HIGHER AFTER COVID-19 INJECTIONS

I really wish that my colleagues following, supporting, and contributing to narrative-buoying misinformation would take the time to watch this from an objective point of view. After all, I review their disseminated information to try to understand their point of view. (I know, this is like Roger Whittaker’s song, “I dream… I but dream.”)

---