I was asked to serve as an expert witness in a tribunal hearing in which the issue of masking to prevent the spread of COVID-19 is being contested. For those who have not served as an expert witness, let me give you a brief overview of what this entails. Expert witnesses are retained by one of the two parties involved in any given case. Of utmost importance, an expert witness serves the court (or tribunal in this instance),
I know someone who has a facial difference and works retail.
Her first work day since Ontario lifted indoor mask mandates was one of the hardest ever.
She never willingly wore a mask but would put one on for required things such as work and going into stores. She wasn't looking forward to today because she knew she was going to be upset.
It was worse than she expected. Instead of being glad to no longer have to, she constantly feels judged. All the self-doubt from her facial difference she had moved on from in previous years came rearing back fiercely.
"I lost two years of my life for THIS" she says sobbing. She feels for all the children with conditions like her who were masked during this time who may now never want to unmask. She's concerned that because masks were made into a twisted symbol of obedience that it's going to have incredibly negative consequences moving forward. She isn't sure how she is going to regain the ability to be seen in public without fear of judgement.
---
I hate what this has done to people, I hate that lasting damage has been done by the carelessness (or more likely malevolence) though this literal scam-demic. I want the evil that was committed during these last two years to be burned into the public conciousness. I hate the people who in their indifference have maintained their own ignorance during this time.
This was a great comprehensive report; I hope it will be share with schoolboards and public in general; Even masking is no longer required, many people are stil wearing them, which gives them false security. Dr. Bridle, thank you for all you do! You kept me sane during last two years of hell. I am wondering if you have any data/opinion on Canadian vaccine?
Been following you since Last May ; keep up the good work. this was fascinating and, unfortunately most people won’t read. Are you going to be talking live to Steve Kirsch anytime soon? I’m on his weekly ( Thursday) call and would be great to hear the two of you.
I heard Mr Trudeau speaking at the EU this morning.
The taking of Canada
1,2,3
shawn
Mar 22
1
This morning CBC is reporting two of the federal parties are for lack of a better description merging. Those two parties being Liberals(Trudeau) and the NDP(Singh).
The merger of these two parties essentially gives the ruling party, Trudeau liberals unobstructed power. They now have a majority in the federal house. While the parties remain separate in name they have agreed to vote together on whatever issues the liberals want to push forward. The NDP have traded off their independence to achieve nationwide pharmacare and dental care for lower income people. While I support this program, in fact its 50 years late. I am very worried about the cost in regulatory benefit/loss.
Rubber hits the road.
The NDP have turned against the people of Canada again. The liberal party had a minority position in the federal house by vote. The NDP has in effect cast out all those votes. Moving the liberals to a majority position not by democratic vote but by proxy. This has happened before, but things are much different now.
The sales hook here, the pharma /dental program. No different than free ballons/ dogs and burgers “come take a test drive”
What is the real goal here now Trudeau/Freeland/Singh have the power to ramrod anything they want, what do they want. Is Mr Singh a graduate of The Schawb school. Who is Mr. Singh representing now.
Has Mr. Singh has failed his voters again.
Do we know what Prime Minister Trudeau / Deputy PM Freeland and his/her motivation really is, are they representing the Schwab school. Singh as leader of the NDP historically represents the working class. Generally the NDP carry 17% of the federal vote. Who is Mr. Singh representing now.
We may cuddle into our blankets late at night thinking my goodness we get dental and pharma isn’t it worth it all. No it is not we could have had those things at any time. Don’t delude yourself thinking this is a small distasteful thing to achieve a bigger better future.
In order to achieve this Mr Singh had to sell out the truckers(the people of Canada) by implementing the war measures act. He obviously is not loyal to the ideals of the working class the NDP. Don’t kid yourself friends we have eduction/heathcare/social justice(?) because historically Canadians have occupied the Hill, the workplace the street to demand a voice. Nothing was given to us. We earned every once/gram, jot and tittel. Mr. Singh has sold us out before he will do so again.
For those individuals that think the Schawb school is a blip consider this please. We have elected officials in both Canada and the USA. Those officials have a duty to be loyal to the country they represent. Does the Schwab school represent the ethos of Canada/USA. Does the Schwab school have an agenda. If it has an agenda fine make it public during the election cycle. If the agenda is valuable to Canadians/Americans a government will win election based on that agenda and longterm goals.
If we awoke one morning and realized our leaders were all of one religion one philosophy how would we react.
All our leaders are scientologists/cathoilics all graduates of the same school system. Would we ask ourselves do our leaders represent by election the ethos of our countries people or by other means the ethos of a particular school. If the answer is the later then do we have a democracy or a defacto dictatorship organized at a distance.
Please circulate this post if you feel it has value to you and your childrens futures. We may not agree on all things but we all agree on democracy.
The default position regardless of scientific or political claims should always be CHOICE. When the option to “justify” is ever in play then FORCE will eventually rule the day. #ChoiceMask vs. #ForceMask? or #ChoiceVax vs. #ForceVax? Choice is freedom, Force is tyranny; it really is that simple.
I am so grateful to have this insight. Thanks for your work and effort, Dr. Bridle. If you could, I have a challenge with this line of Page 7. I understand fully a person's susceptible to the acquisition of viri via the conjunctiva, but this sentence implies a person transmitting the virus FROM the eye. Please clarify and explain if you can. ["As such the eyes could potentially serve as both a portal of entry and a source of person-to-person
Dr Bridle thank you for providing your report and the transcripts. You expressed concern about the accusation made against you regarding harms of masking. Could you address that further, please, as it appears that the cited matterial in your report has been redacted in such a away as to reinforce the accusation against you and others. There seems to be something a bit fishy about this redaction but I would appreciate your response to it. Thanks again for your hard work on the covidmania.
1) the practice of wearing facemasks has compromised safety and efficacy profile, 2) Both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to reduce human-to-human transmission and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, 3) Wearing facemasks has adverse physiological and psychological effects, 4) Long-term consequences of wearing facemasks on health are detrimental.
The context, overall, would be the use of face coverings, indisciminantly, in the general community. It was not focussed on masking symptomatic or C19 sick people in health care settings. It was not focussed on 'medical masks' used by people who are ill with C19 signs and symptoms. So it might have been a bit off-target, overall, but it did include aspects that directly relate to an office or chiropratic practice where the type of mask that Dr Wall would have been 'required' to wear, without exemption, would have been superior to that of the various types worn by his clients.
I would also point out that in our local regional hospital the first thing that the employees do to visitors is to keep them waiting in crowds, and then in line-ups, to pass through an odd staging whereby they are issued masks. So you will see folks wearing their own masks, then handling their mask by taking it off and stowing in pocket or purse, then donning the issued mask, and fiddling with it as they proceed into the bowels of the facility. Then, as they depart, they either continue to wear the issued mask or they discard, or stow, it so as to replace with their own previously worn mask from pocket or handbag. This is to say that the handling of these masks, or face coverings, is very much as you have described, Dr Bridle, in an actual health care facility, a regional hospital with monopoly on hospital services in the area and, as such, offers a daily comparison with a private chiropratic office which has no such monopoly and which screens out C19 sick people. The farce is quite evident for those who open their eyes and apply the very strict criteria of adherence to masking, masking, masking to what they see before their eyes in the heavily controlled environments at the centre of health care in a typical region in Ontario and, I expect, across the country.
My wife has recently had a meeting with the Ontario Nurses Association lawyers to assess her case, relative to all cases , in order to choose which case to pursue . Seems they will choose one or a handful amongst the many bases on their merit . I suspect , dr Brydle , we will see your expert testimony in the legal
Cases ahead . I know we are particularly tracking cases , and your expert witness involvement and thank you very much for having such courage . I weep at your heroism
It’s a long read . I am about half through and look forward to reading your cross examination .
The examination helps nail down where the strengths are in arguments .
I found the argument of only looking at salient covid studies and ignoring related studies , like influenza , at first glance compelling . I hope when your cross examined this gets addressed .
Personally , I found it gratifying to read these kind of public paper pushers get challenged amd observe how they present themselves as fools . If I were in theatre I might do a clown spoof of it really . I one point I thought they were going to bring out a Cretian golf ball to explain it
I know someone who has a facial difference and works retail.
Her first work day since Ontario lifted indoor mask mandates was one of the hardest ever.
She never willingly wore a mask but would put one on for required things such as work and going into stores. She wasn't looking forward to today because she knew she was going to be upset.
It was worse than she expected. Instead of being glad to no longer have to, she constantly feels judged. All the self-doubt from her facial difference she had moved on from in previous years came rearing back fiercely.
"I lost two years of my life for THIS" she says sobbing. She feels for all the children with conditions like her who were masked during this time who may now never want to unmask. She's concerned that because masks were made into a twisted symbol of obedience that it's going to have incredibly negative consequences moving forward. She isn't sure how she is going to regain the ability to be seen in public without fear of judgement.
---
I hate what this has done to people, I hate that lasting damage has been done by the carelessness (or more likely malevolence) though this literal scam-demic. I want the evil that was committed during these last two years to be burned into the public conciousness. I hate the people who in their indifference have maintained their own ignorance during this time.
I haven't read it yet, but it look impressive and I'm confident that it will be valuable. It was disappointing to see only about 20% of the faces at the grocery store yesterday. It had me wondering if I mixed up the drop the mask date here in Ontario. Given that I'm usually the only one, 20% is a slow start. I pity the psychological turmoil that people must(will) go through to realize they've been duped. I share the Brownstone link where I can. https://brownstone.org/articles/more-than-150-comparative-studies-and-articles-on-mask-ineffectiveness-and-harms/?fbclid=IwAR3IZJLqYvoBZuDZHX4CA66d07Goeh2LzWRiDZf5sJtNwOlgL2iOWGZO5GE
This was a great comprehensive report; I hope it will be share with schoolboards and public in general; Even masking is no longer required, many people are stil wearing them, which gives them false security. Dr. Bridle, thank you for all you do! You kept me sane during last two years of hell. I am wondering if you have any data/opinion on Canadian vaccine?
Been following you since Last May ; keep up the good work. this was fascinating and, unfortunately most people won’t read. Are you going to be talking live to Steve Kirsch anytime soon? I’m on his weekly ( Thursday) call and would be great to hear the two of you.
I heard Mr Trudeau speaking at the EU this morning.
The taking of Canada
1,2,3
shawn
Mar 22
1
This morning CBC is reporting two of the federal parties are for lack of a better description merging. Those two parties being Liberals(Trudeau) and the NDP(Singh).
The merger of these two parties essentially gives the ruling party, Trudeau liberals unobstructed power. They now have a majority in the federal house. While the parties remain separate in name they have agreed to vote together on whatever issues the liberals want to push forward. The NDP have traded off their independence to achieve nationwide pharmacare and dental care for lower income people. While I support this program, in fact its 50 years late. I am very worried about the cost in regulatory benefit/loss.
Rubber hits the road.
The NDP have turned against the people of Canada again. The liberal party had a minority position in the federal house by vote. The NDP has in effect cast out all those votes. Moving the liberals to a majority position not by democratic vote but by proxy. This has happened before, but things are much different now.
The sales hook here, the pharma /dental program. No different than free ballons/ dogs and burgers “come take a test drive”
What is the real goal here now Trudeau/Freeland/Singh have the power to ramrod anything they want, what do they want. Is Mr Singh a graduate of The Schawb school. Who is Mr. Singh representing now.
Has Mr. Singh has failed his voters again.
Do we know what Prime Minister Trudeau / Deputy PM Freeland and his/her motivation really is, are they representing the Schwab school. Singh as leader of the NDP historically represents the working class. Generally the NDP carry 17% of the federal vote. Who is Mr. Singh representing now.
We may cuddle into our blankets late at night thinking my goodness we get dental and pharma isn’t it worth it all. No it is not we could have had those things at any time. Don’t delude yourself thinking this is a small distasteful thing to achieve a bigger better future.
In order to achieve this Mr Singh had to sell out the truckers(the people of Canada) by implementing the war measures act. He obviously is not loyal to the ideals of the working class the NDP. Don’t kid yourself friends we have eduction/heathcare/social justice(?) because historically Canadians have occupied the Hill, the workplace the street to demand a voice. Nothing was given to us. We earned every once/gram, jot and tittel. Mr. Singh has sold us out before he will do so again.
For those individuals that think the Schawb school is a blip consider this please. We have elected officials in both Canada and the USA. Those officials have a duty to be loyal to the country they represent. Does the Schwab school represent the ethos of Canada/USA. Does the Schwab school have an agenda. If it has an agenda fine make it public during the election cycle. If the agenda is valuable to Canadians/Americans a government will win election based on that agenda and longterm goals.
If we awoke one morning and realized our leaders were all of one religion one philosophy how would we react.
All our leaders are scientologists/cathoilics all graduates of the same school system. Would we ask ourselves do our leaders represent by election the ethos of our countries people or by other means the ethos of a particular school. If the answer is the later then do we have a democracy or a defacto dictatorship organized at a distance.
Please circulate this post if you feel it has value to you and your childrens futures. We may not agree on all things but we all agree on democracy.
Shawn663
Thank you for all you do!
First time I 'met' you was during an online conference in August, 2020. I asked questions in chat and you were so kind to answer.
Thank you for posting Reports from Hearing. Will read them closely!
Your report B is wonderful.
The default position regardless of scientific or political claims should always be CHOICE. When the option to “justify” is ever in play then FORCE will eventually rule the day. #ChoiceMask vs. #ForceMask? or #ChoiceVax vs. #ForceVax? Choice is freedom, Force is tyranny; it really is that simple.
I am so grateful to have this insight. Thanks for your work and effort, Dr. Bridle. If you could, I have a challenge with this line of Page 7. I understand fully a person's susceptible to the acquisition of viri via the conjunctiva, but this sentence implies a person transmitting the virus FROM the eye. Please clarify and explain if you can. ["As such the eyes could potentially serve as both a portal of entry and a source of person-to-person
transmission." notation 7, page 7]
Dr Bridle thank you for providing your report and the transcripts. You expressed concern about the accusation made against you regarding harms of masking. Could you address that further, please, as it appears that the cited matterial in your report has been redacted in such a away as to reinforce the accusation against you and others. There seems to be something a bit fishy about this redaction but I would appreciate your response to it. Thanks again for your hard work on the covidmania.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114149/
The hypothesis in the citated work was summed-up as follows.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
1) the practice of wearing facemasks has compromised safety and efficacy profile, 2) Both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to reduce human-to-human transmission and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, 3) Wearing facemasks has adverse physiological and psychological effects, 4) Long-term consequences of wearing facemasks on health are detrimental.
The context, overall, would be the use of face coverings, indisciminantly, in the general community. It was not focussed on masking symptomatic or C19 sick people in health care settings. It was not focussed on 'medical masks' used by people who are ill with C19 signs and symptoms. So it might have been a bit off-target, overall, but it did include aspects that directly relate to an office or chiropratic practice where the type of mask that Dr Wall would have been 'required' to wear, without exemption, would have been superior to that of the various types worn by his clients.
I would also point out that in our local regional hospital the first thing that the employees do to visitors is to keep them waiting in crowds, and then in line-ups, to pass through an odd staging whereby they are issued masks. So you will see folks wearing their own masks, then handling their mask by taking it off and stowing in pocket or purse, then donning the issued mask, and fiddling with it as they proceed into the bowels of the facility. Then, as they depart, they either continue to wear the issued mask or they discard, or stow, it so as to replace with their own previously worn mask from pocket or handbag. This is to say that the handling of these masks, or face coverings, is very much as you have described, Dr Bridle, in an actual health care facility, a regional hospital with monopoly on hospital services in the area and, as such, offers a daily comparison with a private chiropratic office which has no such monopoly and which screens out C19 sick people. The farce is quite evident for those who open their eyes and apply the very strict criteria of adherence to masking, masking, masking to what they see before their eyes in the heavily controlled environments at the centre of health care in a typical region in Ontario and, I expect, across the country.
My wife has recently had a meeting with the Ontario Nurses Association lawyers to assess her case, relative to all cases , in order to choose which case to pursue . Seems they will choose one or a handful amongst the many bases on their merit . I suspect , dr Brydle , we will see your expert testimony in the legal
Cases ahead . I know we are particularly tracking cases , and your expert witness involvement and thank you very much for having such courage . I weep at your heroism
It’s a long read . I am about half through and look forward to reading your cross examination .
The examination helps nail down where the strengths are in arguments .
I found the argument of only looking at salient covid studies and ignoring related studies , like influenza , at first glance compelling . I hope when your cross examined this gets addressed .
Personally , I found it gratifying to read these kind of public paper pushers get challenged amd observe how they present themselves as fools . If I were in theatre I might do a clown spoof of it really . I one point I thought they were going to bring out a Cretian golf ball to explain it
I have skimmed through 93 pages of the transcript thus far. Some fascinating facts, thank you.
Of particular interest to me is any words on masks. IF, and only if, you recall could you direct me to where I can find the discussion on masks?
Thank you!
i would like to read these articles but am unable to open them. do i need to be a paid subscriber to do this?