I would be there in a New York minute (an Ontario minute in this case I guess, haha) if I weren't stuck all the way over here in the police state of Quebec !
I've been following you since the day you spoke on a flat bed truck in 20 below zero Celsius weather in front of Parliament Hill.
Please never lose heart for the convictions you feel that keep you going.
Your followers love and appreciate all your efforts through the ensuing years ! Shocking to think, it's even been years !
Was not aware of the disgusting behaviour towards Jessica Rose, especially regarding being banned by her employer. They should be proud to have such a brilliant colleague but instead close ranks and act like sheep.
check out bakerinstitute.org to hear a live stream of Peter Toad Hotez tonight at Rice U. Don't eat before listening to this Judas goat or you might throw up. at eventide starting at 6pm EDT.
Thank you for your ongoing courage in the face of such adversity. You speak for those of us who don't have a platform that lends us the required credibility.
Thanks for posting about the World Health Council hearing on Oct. 9. I've recently read an article that spoke of these very disturbing findings and am interested in hearing more.
DR. BYRAM BRIDLE: Hello everybody. I'd really like to thank the organizers for having me here to speak today. So just to let you know I'm an Associate Professor of Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph [turns and spits] and—
[cheers]
Yeah, I can't say that I'm proud of my university at all anymore. I stand with Michael Palmer* on that. Now I'm a vaccinologist, I traditionally love vaccines and develop vaccine technologies, but I do not like these current covid-19 inoculations they're giving to people.
And you do have to understand that we have changed the definition of a vaccine** during this pandemic
to try and make these fit.
I'd like to highlight, a real vaccine is one that would take for travel, for example. So a lot of people are constantly asking the question, you know, we already mandate vaccines for schoolchildren, so what's wrong with this? Well, the vaccines that we traditionally mandated actually work. They confer what we call sterilizing or near-sterilizing immunity. They actually prevent somebody from allowing the virus to propagate in their body and pass it on to others.
So I like to use the example of vaccines for travel. If you go to a lot of exotic locations, often your physician will recommend that you receive a vaccine. For example, maybe you need to get vaccinated against hepatitis B. When you take these vaccines, the doctor doesn't say, stay away from other people, they certainly don't say stay away from the place you're intending to travel. No, in fact, people pay lots of money to travel to the danger zone where this pathogen is actually endemic because they're confident they're protected. Those are the real vaccines.
2:05
Now I want to point out something. I'll tell you honestly, right now I feel, I get certainly burnt out and emotionally numb. This is really hard as a scientist to see where we're going and the fact that we're not following the science.
So one of the things I just want to ask for a moment, is there anybody in the crowd here who really, strongly supports the vaccine mandates and thinks these vaccines are incredibly effective and incredibly safe? Is there anybody willing to put their hand up?
WOMAN'S VOICE: No!
DR. BYRAM BRIDLE: Out on the periphery of the crowd, anybody on the periphery sort of hanging back and you want to see what's going on and you're really for the vaccines? Because if you are, I would invite you up and I'll give you 5 to 10 minutes of my time and we can engage in a respectful scientific discussion about the vaccines.
[cheers, applause]
Is there anybody who will do that?
[cheers, applause]
I don't see any hands up. But what I want to point out is I'm going to offer that to thousands of people, thousands of naysayers and not one person will step up and discuss the science with myself or any of my colleagues such as Dr. Palmer and many, many others around the world. And for those who—
Is there somebody up there who will talk?
[cheers, applause]
Come on up, come on up.
[cheers, applause]
Yes, this is great, I appreciate it. As scientists we should be open to respectful discussions, and we should be willing to change our minds if we're proven wrong.
[cheers, applause]
MAN IN GREY CAP [approaching]: Dr. Bridle it's a privilege to meet you.
DR. BYRAM BRIDLE: OK.
3:48
MAN IN GREY CAP: Wondering what you can say about the Novavax vaccine, which is supposed to be a protein [inaudible] and not the mRNA genetic [inaudible]
VOICES FROM CROWD: [inaudible, presumably protesting that they cannot hear]
DR. BYRAM BRIDLE: So you had a question. OK I can address that. [taking the microphone again, addressing crowd] OK. I was hoping we we're going to have a, a debate. It was actually a question about the Novax vaccine. But that's great, I'll address that for people, I love to address people's questions.
So there are other vaccines technologies that are up and coming. What I will say is, in theory they should be safer than the current batch because they all are going to have better control over the dose of the spike protein and in theory they shouldn't be disseminated as throughout the body.
However I'm never going to support any of the up and coming vaccines unless they complete all of the studies that are required, for, that's been required for all traditional vaccines. OK?
[cheers, applause]
So there is not one that I stand by at this point time.
[applause]
Thanks for that question.
And so what I do want to point out is, nobody is willing to discuss the science, alright? I was part of a group, we gave an invitation to our premier, like I said, it's been thousands of people, and to those who are the naysayers have to start asking, why are there a bunch of us who have stepped into the ring and nobody else? None of your champions are willing to step in the arena with us? Why? Right? As scientists, we're willing to debate the science. We keep getting attacked by people who hide behind their screens. And they're not willing to come and talk to us. They say we don't know what we're talking about. They say that we're feeding misinformation to you the public. And if that's the case, why aren't they having scientific discussions with us? As scientists, we're open to admitting when we're proven wrong. And if we're so wrong, why aren't they proving it? They would shut us up, they would silence us.
[applause]
5:36
So I'm getting very frustrated by this. And for those of you who don't know about these fact checkers. I've been fact checked to the wazoo and I have addressed every single fact checker question I'm aware of in various media appearances. Every single one. Just recently, Reuters— and they never tell you who's doing the fact checking, and I'll tell you, oftentimes the fact checkers are trainees, like post-doctoral fellows from other countries that are fact checking us. It's incredible. We never know who's fact checking. But anyway somebody took about a 90 second video clip of a talk that I gave at a rally like this, and they want to do the fact checks, they misquoted me, and I asked them to go back to the video, they misquoted me to make it seem more inflammatory the things that I had said. But nevertheless they wanted to know what my references were. So I sent them, a very detailed email with all of the scientific references. They published nothing. That's what happens.
What they do is they wait, they usually give you one day to respond which is not realistic for a busy professional, and especially one that has over 17,000 unread emails. But that's what they do, and when you don't respond, they, they publish their fact check and tell the public that you weren't willing to respond. And then when you respond, with all the science, and they have nothing to come up with, they simply don't publish it. So I don't even bother dealing with the fact checkers anymore. OK?
The 9th is Thanksgiving here in Ohhhh Canada ... hopefully it will be recorded and available later ... the others are more accessible ... I guess the war is no longer subtle and the sheeple are still as unaware and uninterested in the truth as they forge on with their endless quest for MORE ... a rude awakening doesn't even begin to describe the coming hellsccape! ONBOARDING will have a whole new meaning.
Congratulations on having the courage to continue revealing the truth
Dear Dr. Bridle,
I would be there in a New York minute (an Ontario minute in this case I guess, haha) if I weren't stuck all the way over here in the police state of Quebec !
I've been following you since the day you spoke on a flat bed truck in 20 below zero Celsius weather in front of Parliament Hill.
Please never lose heart for the convictions you feel that keep you going.
Your followers love and appreciate all your efforts through the ensuing years ! Shocking to think, it's even been years !
Your dignity and perseverance, so admired.
Was not aware of the disgusting behaviour towards Jessica Rose, especially regarding being banned by her employer. They should be proud to have such a brilliant colleague but instead close ranks and act like sheep.
check out bakerinstitute.org to hear a live stream of Peter Toad Hotez tonight at Rice U. Don't eat before listening to this Judas goat or you might throw up. at eventide starting at 6pm EDT.
Thank you for continuing to fight for the truth & our freedoms!
Excellent piece of writing Mr Bridle. I feel ashamed as Swede to have such fellow citizens.
You really stand up for the human race! Full marks!
Thank you for your ongoing courage in the face of such adversity. You speak for those of us who don't have a platform that lends us the required credibility.
Yep, me too in my own small world... But, we are strong. Never forget that. You have proved it. Thank you.
Thanks for posting about the World Health Council hearing on Oct. 9. I've recently read an article that spoke of these very disturbing findings and am interested in hearing more.
Hi this is awesome!! Will this event be viewable as a rerun after the fact?
With my profound thanks for your standing for health and truth -- loud and clear and early on.
Viral immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle speaks at Waterloo region for medical freedom rally 10/24/21
[Waterloo Region for Freedom Rally, Waterloo Town Square, Canada]
Free Speech Media, October 24, 2021
https://rumble.com/vo6chr-viral-immunologist-dr.-byram-bridle-speaks-at-waterloo-region-for-medical-f.html
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE:
Dr. Byram Bridle blogs at https://viralimmunologist.substack.com.
TRANSCRIPT - EXCERPT
0:30
DR. BYRAM BRIDLE: Hello everybody. I'd really like to thank the organizers for having me here to speak today. So just to let you know I'm an Associate Professor of Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph [turns and spits] and—
[cheers]
Yeah, I can't say that I'm proud of my university at all anymore. I stand with Michael Palmer* on that. Now I'm a vaccinologist, I traditionally love vaccines and develop vaccine technologies, but I do not like these current covid-19 inoculations they're giving to people.
And you do have to understand that we have changed the definition of a vaccine** during this pandemic
to try and make these fit.
I'd like to highlight, a real vaccine is one that would take for travel, for example. So a lot of people are constantly asking the question, you know, we already mandate vaccines for schoolchildren, so what's wrong with this? Well, the vaccines that we traditionally mandated actually work. They confer what we call sterilizing or near-sterilizing immunity. They actually prevent somebody from allowing the virus to propagate in their body and pass it on to others.
So I like to use the example of vaccines for travel. If you go to a lot of exotic locations, often your physician will recommend that you receive a vaccine. For example, maybe you need to get vaccinated against hepatitis B. When you take these vaccines, the doctor doesn't say, stay away from other people, they certainly don't say stay away from the place you're intending to travel. No, in fact, people pay lots of money to travel to the danger zone where this pathogen is actually endemic because they're confident they're protected. Those are the real vaccines.
2:05
Now I want to point out something. I'll tell you honestly, right now I feel, I get certainly burnt out and emotionally numb. This is really hard as a scientist to see where we're going and the fact that we're not following the science.
So one of the things I just want to ask for a moment, is there anybody in the crowd here who really, strongly supports the vaccine mandates and thinks these vaccines are incredibly effective and incredibly safe? Is there anybody willing to put their hand up?
WOMAN'S VOICE: No!
DR. BYRAM BRIDLE: Out on the periphery of the crowd, anybody on the periphery sort of hanging back and you want to see what's going on and you're really for the vaccines? Because if you are, I would invite you up and I'll give you 5 to 10 minutes of my time and we can engage in a respectful scientific discussion about the vaccines.
[cheers, applause]
Is there anybody who will do that?
[cheers, applause]
I don't see any hands up. But what I want to point out is I'm going to offer that to thousands of people, thousands of naysayers and not one person will step up and discuss the science with myself or any of my colleagues such as Dr. Palmer and many, many others around the world. And for those who—
Is there somebody up there who will talk?
[cheers, applause]
Come on up, come on up.
[cheers, applause]
Yes, this is great, I appreciate it. As scientists we should be open to respectful discussions, and we should be willing to change our minds if we're proven wrong.
[cheers, applause]
MAN IN GREY CAP [approaching]: Dr. Bridle it's a privilege to meet you.
DR. BYRAM BRIDLE: OK.
3:48
MAN IN GREY CAP: Wondering what you can say about the Novavax vaccine, which is supposed to be a protein [inaudible] and not the mRNA genetic [inaudible]
VOICES FROM CROWD: [inaudible, presumably protesting that they cannot hear]
DR. BYRAM BRIDLE: So you had a question. OK I can address that. [taking the microphone again, addressing crowd] OK. I was hoping we we're going to have a, a debate. It was actually a question about the Novax vaccine. But that's great, I'll address that for people, I love to address people's questions.
So there are other vaccines technologies that are up and coming. What I will say is, in theory they should be safer than the current batch because they all are going to have better control over the dose of the spike protein and in theory they shouldn't be disseminated as throughout the body.
However I'm never going to support any of the up and coming vaccines unless they complete all of the studies that are required, for, that's been required for all traditional vaccines. OK?
[cheers, applause]
So there is not one that I stand by at this point time.
[applause]
Thanks for that question.
And so what I do want to point out is, nobody is willing to discuss the science, alright? I was part of a group, we gave an invitation to our premier, like I said, it's been thousands of people, and to those who are the naysayers have to start asking, why are there a bunch of us who have stepped into the ring and nobody else? None of your champions are willing to step in the arena with us? Why? Right? As scientists, we're willing to debate the science. We keep getting attacked by people who hide behind their screens. And they're not willing to come and talk to us. They say we don't know what we're talking about. They say that we're feeding misinformation to you the public. And if that's the case, why aren't they having scientific discussions with us? As scientists, we're open to admitting when we're proven wrong. And if we're so wrong, why aren't they proving it? They would shut us up, they would silence us.
[applause]
5:36
So I'm getting very frustrated by this. And for those of you who don't know about these fact checkers. I've been fact checked to the wazoo and I have addressed every single fact checker question I'm aware of in various media appearances. Every single one. Just recently, Reuters— and they never tell you who's doing the fact checking, and I'll tell you, oftentimes the fact checkers are trainees, like post-doctoral fellows from other countries that are fact checking us. It's incredible. We never know who's fact checking. But anyway somebody took about a 90 second video clip of a talk that I gave at a rally like this, and they want to do the fact checks, they misquoted me, and I asked them to go back to the video, they misquoted me to make it seem more inflammatory the things that I had said. But nevertheless they wanted to know what my references were. So I sent them, a very detailed email with all of the scientific references. They published nothing. That's what happens.
What they do is they wait, they usually give you one day to respond which is not realistic for a busy professional, and especially one that has over 17,000 unread emails. But that's what they do, and when you don't respond, they, they publish their fact check and tell the public that you weren't willing to respond. And then when you respond, with all the science, and they have nothing to come up with, they simply don't publish it. So I don't even bother dealing with the fact checkers anymore. OK?
...continued...
The 9th is Thanksgiving here in Ohhhh Canada ... hopefully it will be recorded and available later ... the others are more accessible ... I guess the war is no longer subtle and the sheeple are still as unaware and uninterested in the truth as they forge on with their endless quest for MORE ... a rude awakening doesn't even begin to describe the coming hellsccape! ONBOARDING will have a whole new meaning.
Hello Dr Britle, How can I reach you to ask a specific question?